Interesting - I've only met a couple of Cane Corsos up close, and I didn't think they gave the same aggressive vibe as the XL bullies I have met/encountered in public. My understanding is that only bull breeds and other already banned breeds were truly bred for fighting, so have that hair line trigger temperament, as well as 'tearing' injury type jaw? Things like Canes more for guarding property etc, not actively breaking free to fight or chase after smaller creatures (other dogs, children etc) I am genuinely interested/asking, not pretending to know all the ins and outs of different big dog breeds....Personally I love dogs, and have had different breeds in family, including staffies, but I wouldn't have ANY big dog bred for guarding or fighting, or bull breed in general around children. Yes, any dog can bite (my at the time 1 year old got too close to family Cav KC when she was under a table eating without us realising she was there and got bitten. A very different outcome that would have been if the dog in question had a bully bite force and tenacity!)
Essentially, I know some people will always want big/guard dogs but there should be more regulation on breeding in general to ensure wellbeing of the dogs and puppies, and licenses would be a good place to encourage responsible ownership. If there are statistical trends and breed indicators for a breed being dangerous to people and other dogs then yes, I am happy that they are banned to stop further breeding...and existing pets should be muzzled in public, kept on strong short lead, pass an independent temperament assessment and safely contained with appropriate doors and gate systems at home. Individual choices for owning ANY big dogs that can easily cause death and injury to innocent bystanders, most often children, should not trump the rights of the rest of us to walk around our local areas and parks with our children and dogs and feel safe.