Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Lucy letby - New threads (Part 3)

244 replies

WhiteFire · 01/09/2023 18:17

The last thread has closed. I have kept the thread title in line with the previous one for continuity.

I have just started listening to the Daily Mail podcasts which gives a good overview.

https://podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/the-trial-of-lucy-letby/id1653090985

I've downloaded an app called Radio net so I can download them and then listen off line.

The evidence against her is compelling, the defence is pretty much "it wasn't me"

OP posts:
ZadocPDederick · 01/09/2023 22:18

LuluJili · 01/09/2023 21:49

No. It was a high profile case. Which has been world wide news as it should be.

It's been discussed more extensively than
most cases. In the mainstream media and on wider social media like YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, TikTok and Mumsnet.

This isn't anyone saying 'ooh this is so horrible or raises so many questions that we should brush it under the carpet' and ignore it.

No-one has! It's been worldwide news. Every news channel, tabloid or non-tabloid newspaper have not just reported on the facts of the case but also hosted their 'ex-NHS manager who wasn't involved gives their view, psychologist who has never met her or anyone that has gives their view, serial killer expert that also never met her says this".

And thousands of MN posts of people saying 'well obviously she's guilty" and others saying no she's innocent. And some saying well I've had doubts and saying why and others answering those doubts. And some people saying well an adult woman who goes on holiday with her parents is obviously a weirdo. And her parents must be weirdos because they put a congratulations on passing your nursing course notice in the paper..

And all this other endless, pointless judgmental theorising and armchair pseudo-pstchology about her, her life, her parents etc and theories about the Police investigation was crap, or the prosecution was crap, or the defence was crap. Or the judge was. Or the jury

But what is there new to say?

There's literally nothing new to say that hasn't been discussed infinitum in the press, and on social media. And on Mumsnet.

This is a real case. Real people. Perpetrator and victim's.

When there's nothing new to say, social media users need to take responsibility for themselves and look at the information already available and not want to carry on a ghoulish, creepy conversation that is just giving them a bit of a thrill, erroneously thinking they're just trying to get to the truth or need to talk about it because of x, y or z

You don't.

It's time to stop talking about it and keeping it in the news.

And yet we're still discussing other high profile cases like Hindley and Brady, Ian Huntley, the Wests, Shipman, Sally Clark, Stefan Kiszko, Peter Sutcliffe - in some cases, almost 60 years after the original events.

Face it, this is not going to disappear from the news, particularly with the inquiry to come, to say nothing of potential civil claims and a possible appeal. The fact that you've expended so many paragraphs on it kind of demonstrates all of that, too.

Hawkins0009 · 01/09/2023 22:34

ZadocPDederick · 01/09/2023 22:18

And yet we're still discussing other high profile cases like Hindley and Brady, Ian Huntley, the Wests, Shipman, Sally Clark, Stefan Kiszko, Peter Sutcliffe - in some cases, almost 60 years after the original events.

Face it, this is not going to disappear from the news, particularly with the inquiry to come, to say nothing of potential civil claims and a possible appeal. The fact that you've expended so many paragraphs on it kind of demonstrates all of that, too.

That's an apt point too.

lifeturnsonadime · 01/09/2023 22:47

ZadocPDederick · 01/09/2023 22:18

And yet we're still discussing other high profile cases like Hindley and Brady, Ian Huntley, the Wests, Shipman, Sally Clark, Stefan Kiszko, Peter Sutcliffe - in some cases, almost 60 years after the original events.

Face it, this is not going to disappear from the news, particularly with the inquiry to come, to say nothing of potential civil claims and a possible appeal. The fact that you've expended so many paragraphs on it kind of demonstrates all of that, too.

I feel certain that civil cases will follow.

There is culpability on the part of the health trust from the period that they were alerted to the possibility that LL was connected with every case of death or harm and when she was actually removed from her role.

I am certain that the families will have been advised legally on this and that a class action will follow. It may happen behind closed doors though.

SisterJo · 02/09/2023 00:33

Class actions aren’t a thing in England and Wales. I’m certain the parents will be seeing solicitors already though.

Araminta34 · 02/09/2023 05:17

Hawkins0009 · 01/09/2023 21:55

Ah I see, haven't realised

I had a quick look at some of them, they're all short, and with nothing more to add than has already been widely reported. Just people trying to cash in on the whole tragedy.

TheLadyInWestminsterAbbey · 02/09/2023 08:15

Thanks for the new thread OP.
Like others I have only started listening to the podcasts since the verdict. I didn't read many of the newspaper reports during the trial as there was so much sensationalist reporting and it was going on so long. As the podcasts point out they are giving much more detail than has been reported in the news and are very accurate as they could ONLY report/discuss what the jury had heard due to contempt of court laws. Plus there are very interesting discussions with people like the court artist or seasoned court reporters about their work.
I like being able to have a civilised discussion about some of these extra details.

lifeturnsonadime · 02/09/2023 08:36

SisterJo · 02/09/2023 00:33

Class actions aren’t a thing in England and Wales. I’m certain the parents will be seeing solicitors already though.

Not quite true, collective/ class actions can be brought in PI type claims.

They are dealt with, sometimes, under Group Litigation Orders (GLO)

itsgettingweird · 02/09/2023 11:18

TheLadyInWestminsterAbbey · 02/09/2023 08:15

Thanks for the new thread OP.
Like others I have only started listening to the podcasts since the verdict. I didn't read many of the newspaper reports during the trial as there was so much sensationalist reporting and it was going on so long. As the podcasts point out they are giving much more detail than has been reported in the news and are very accurate as they could ONLY report/discuss what the jury had heard due to contempt of court laws. Plus there are very interesting discussions with people like the court artist or seasoned court reporters about their work.
I like being able to have a civilised discussion about some of these extra details.

I agree.

Every big case is still discussed year on.

If we didn't keep the communication channels open re facts of these cases it makes it harder to prevent them occurring again.

BIossomtoes · 02/09/2023 11:36

Apparently at least two of the families have engaged solicitors. Those with children with life changing conditions were always going to seek compensation to cover the enormous ongoing costs involved.

xsquared · 02/09/2023 12:30

BIossomtoes · 02/09/2023 11:36

Apparently at least two of the families have engaged solicitors. Those with children with life changing conditions were always going to seek compensation to cover the enormous ongoing costs involved.

And so they should. Their lives have been completely obliterated due to LL's actions and management's inaction.

BIossomtoes · 02/09/2023 13:59

Of course they should. That goes without saying.

ZadocPDederick · 02/09/2023 16:59

I'm listening to the podcasts for the first time, though only on episode 7. One fairly striking point is various nurse colleagues of LL sympathising with her for the awful time she was having because she was always there when babies died. I wonder whether any of them were having suspicions at an earlier stage?

Also, does anyone know why some of the medical staff are anonymised but not all?

itsgettingweird · 02/09/2023 17:15

ZadocPDederick · 02/09/2023 16:59

I'm listening to the podcasts for the first time, though only on episode 7. One fairly striking point is various nurse colleagues of LL sympathising with her for the awful time she was having because she was always there when babies died. I wonder whether any of them were having suspicions at an earlier stage?

Also, does anyone know why some of the medical staff are anonymised but not all?

And I found it interesting that she seemed to also want to highlight she was always there too.

needtofatoff · 02/09/2023 18:33

Its important to discuss cases like this. I think there are probably lots more psycopaths out there hiding in plain sight. Discussion means that we are more aware and therefore safer. Sad but true.

itsgettingweird · 02/09/2023 20:01

Just re listening to her being interviewed by prosecution. (I'm batch cooking!)

What really stood out for me was the questioning around the "go commando" comment.

She laughed in the texts.

But said she couldn't say if she knew what commando meant.

It's just such an odd response. You either know or don't.

Janieforever · 02/09/2023 21:09

itsgettingweird · 02/09/2023 20:01

Just re listening to her being interviewed by prosecution. (I'm batch cooking!)

What really stood out for me was the questioning around the "go commando" comment.

She laughed in the texts.

But said she couldn't say if she knew what commando meant.

It's just such an odd response. You either know or don't.

Yes it was an obvious and pointless lie. It’s clear she knows what it means.

Janieforever · 02/09/2023 21:10

ZadocPDederick · 02/09/2023 16:59

I'm listening to the podcasts for the first time, though only on episode 7. One fairly striking point is various nurse colleagues of LL sympathising with her for the awful time she was having because she was always there when babies died. I wonder whether any of them were having suspicions at an earlier stage?

Also, does anyone know why some of the medical staff are anonymised but not all?

You can apply to the court for anonymity before the trial., the flirty boyfriend come doctor did.

ZadocPDederick · 02/09/2023 22:59

Janieforever · 02/09/2023 21:10

You can apply to the court for anonymity before the trial., the flirty boyfriend come doctor did.

Yes, I realise something like that must have happened, but as I understand it you don't get anonymity just because you ask - there has to be a reason. Something to do with the basic principle of open justice. So I'm wondering why some medics are anonymous but not all.

Tambatamba · 02/09/2023 23:08

@LuluJili stop dictating what people can and can't talk about on a discussion forum! Jeez how arrogant...

Tambatamba · 02/09/2023 23:10

The podcasts are very useful and incredibly enlightening. I can't understand how people can listen to those podcasts and think that LL is innocent.

The Covid deniers are finding a new thing to find an alternative, skewed narrative about 🙄

Tambatamba · 02/09/2023 23:12

needtofatoff · 02/09/2023 18:33

Its important to discuss cases like this. I think there are probably lots more psycopaths out there hiding in plain sight. Discussion means that we are more aware and therefore safer. Sad but true.

100% this. And also, isn't there a statistic that nearly half of female serial killers work in a care / medical setting?

itsgettingweird · 03/09/2023 06:03

Yes it was an obvious and pointless lie. It’s clear she knows what it means.

Yes - pointless is a good description. It was just a 30 second exchange but for me it was so interesting and seemed a real insight into how she controlled narrative.

There was nothing wrong with the text and wasn't incriminating as such. The only explanation I can think was it would hint at her wanting more with Dr A or that more happened which she's obviously denied. And the link that someone suggested her motive was to get him to the ward to work with her.

Janieforever · 03/09/2023 08:02

itsgettingweird · 03/09/2023 06:03

Yes it was an obvious and pointless lie. It’s clear she knows what it means.

Yes - pointless is a good description. It was just a 30 second exchange but for me it was so interesting and seemed a real insight into how she controlled narrative.

There was nothing wrong with the text and wasn't incriminating as such. The only explanation I can think was it would hint at her wanting more with Dr A or that more happened which she's obviously denied. And the link that someone suggested her motive was to get him to the ward to work with her.

I agree, if she’d simply answered the question it would have been no big deal.

but I think everyone realises. Well nearly everyone, she isn’t normal and her behaviour is unfathomable. She lies by default. It’s her going in position. She sat and lied continuously on that stand, so this was just another example.

BathingBeauty · 03/09/2023 08:12

It suggested something sexual and she was desperate to pretend it was a purely platonic relationship.
I suspect Dr A was stringing her along for his ego, something similar happened to a friend of mine. No affair but seemed to use my friend purely as an ego boost.

Swipe left for the next trending thread