But 2.5 miles deep in the ocean it needs to be "fail never".
This thread which @SheilaFentiman posted is really interesting. I commented on it above because it identifies the many safety failings in the Titan and compares it with the sub James Cameron used to go to the bottom of the Marina Trench.
https://twitter.com/LadyDoctorSays/status/1671700989429297152?s=20
The Marina Trench sub has 4 backup methods to drop weights to get to the surface. The Titan had only one system to rise.
It has 5 methods by which it could be tracked/located when it surfaced. The Titan had none.
The Marina Trench vehicle had 12 thrusters to move around on the ocean floor. The Titan only had 4 - two vertical, two horizontal. As she points out if one of the vertical thrusters fails, it can only then spin round and round on a central axis using one vertical thruster.
Comms should be a never fail and if it does you need several alternate methods. Titan had one comms system which repeatedly failed.
Most deep sea vehicles are round because of the pressure. The Marina Trench sub had a spherical cock pit at the bottom that held one man. The Titan had an elongated middle section - in order to take passengers - which connects to two spherical end pieces. This was a known risk of failure - both at the join and because there was a chunky part holding people that wasn't spherical. Most of the deep sea pressured chambers are spe
It's shocking.
How Oceangate and Stockton Rush can have made a big fuss about they were safety concisious is mind boggling. They must be self deluded.