There aren’t any answers.
The only things we can do are break international law by denying them asylum, or physically stopping the boats from setting off.
There is absolutely nothing else.
The fact is the Afghan army, who the West spent millions training and equipping, ran off and abandoned their duties. And now they’ve abandoned their women and children to who knows what fate, and want to come here.
These are men from countries where women are sub human. I cannot stress that enough.
On any other MN thread, the safety of women and girls comes before the feelings of men. But not here - not Afghan women and girls, not British women and girls. All expected to put up with feeling unsafe to give the men what they want.
Once again, women and girls are seen as an acceptable price to pay to affirm men. It’s just acceptable on MN this time as the men in question are not white.
Why doesn’t anyone address my safety concerns about the channel migrants in terms of the safety of women and girls?
I meant British women. And 90% of the boat migrants are male.
I would happily take and financially support virtually any number of women and child refugees. But not men. There are very few downsides to being a man in this world. This should be the only one.
None of this reads as rational or nuanced to me.