Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Director of Lived Experience role at NHS on £115K

239 replies

ImJustMadAboutSaffron · 16/12/2022 15:27

www.healthjobsuk.com/job/UK/Staffordshire/Stafford/Midlands_Partnership_NHS_Foundation_Trust/Director/Director-v4828381

What the absolute hell? Words fail me.

OP posts:
NewStartIn50s · 16/12/2022 17:03

We all have a 'lived experience' but what 'lived experience' are they looking for..... Trans/black/gay/?/white/homeless/doctor role/patient role/ what exactly for that waffling descriptor and huge salary

lipstickwoman · 16/12/2022 17:03

@pursuedbyablackdog for Health Minister 👍🏻👍🏻

NewToWoo · 16/12/2022 17:05

ImJustMadAboutSaffron · 16/12/2022 15:31

It's high time the NHS axed the tiers of Trust positions and unnecessary, non medical advisors and administrators. There's a hierarchy of NHS fat cats milking the NHS and they need to be cleared out.

Yes. I'd rather have 2-3 qualified nurses than someone devoted to blarney.

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about this subject:

Allthegoodnamesarechosen · 16/12/2022 17:05

AlisonDonut · 16/12/2022 15:39

I don't understand still what this means, someone who is alive would surely fit the bill?

I think it’s about men who don’t think they are.

PermanentTemporary · 16/12/2022 17:08

What - you don't think that people who actually experience serious illness and get treated by the NHS should have a significant voice at the Board?

I think we probably need more of this, not less.

PlaitBilledDuckyPuss · 16/12/2022 17:10

It might be a valid role but is it really worth nearly 4 x the average salary of a nurse?

Tired2tired · 16/12/2022 17:11

" Ensure brave spaces for people who use our services to feel they can have feedback to the
organisation."

Director of Lived Experience role at NHS on £115K
lipstickwoman · 16/12/2022 17:12

You can pay people big salaries to have good ideas but it will be utterly pointless unless there's an adequate workforce to implement their good ideas.

FurryDandelionSeekingMissile · 16/12/2022 17:16

NewStartIn50s · 16/12/2022 17:03

We all have a 'lived experience' but what 'lived experience' are they looking for..... Trans/black/gay/?/white/homeless/doctor role/patient role/ what exactly for that waffling descriptor and huge salary

People need to pay attention to the context.

It's a trust that provides a lot of mental health related services. "Lived experience" is a term already in VERY wide use in that sector to refer to the experiences and voices of people who know what it's like to be seriously mentally ill (and to get treated like shit a lot of the time by services), and more specifically, to describe roles in the service for who have those experiences and use them as part of their job working in the sector.

If an organisation advertises for a role using a particular phrase that might be ambiguous to the general public but means something specific to people who work in that type of organisation, then that's probably what they're using it to mean.

As the Trust provides other services outside mental health, perhaps the director will be expected to incorporate the perspective of people with lived experience of the other types of problem they deal with, too — it's not that clear (which isn't great, no — the ad could be better-written).

FurryDandelionSeekingMissile · 16/12/2022 17:25

Allthegoodnamesarechosen · 16/12/2022 17:05

I think it’s about men who don’t think they are.

For fuck's sake. I had to see this all over GC Twitter yesterday/day before yesterday, now it's here too.

You're playing into the TRA agenda of trying to make it look like gender critical feminists are just bigoted kneejerking Daily Mail readers in disguise, if you jump on anything that looks vaguely like it's trying to improve things for minorities and complain it's probably about giving special things to trans people.

This is about trying to start involving people in their own care. The kind of people who have been coerced and abused and had their feelings and opinions disregarded by the people who were supposed to help them for hundreds of years.

Lostinabba · 16/12/2022 17:25

@pursuedbyablackdog great post. @lipstickwoman are you my MIL she's a retired Senior nurse and she echoes everything you say!

MadameMackenzie · 16/12/2022 17:32

ColonelOfTruth · 16/12/2022 15:29

Why do words fail you? It’s fantastic that the NHS values a role of this kind.

Hahahahahaha! As if. Opinions like this, are why the NHS are on their knees

HashBrownandBeans · 16/12/2022 17:33

Mamansparkles · 16/12/2022 16:25

The idea of having someone at board level who has extensive 'lived experience' as a patient and can explain what the NHS is like from a patient perspective (ie a shitshow) so they can make changes to make the system work for patients is really good. I don't quite see how it commands that kind of salary though!

I was just coming here to say this! If you can make sense of the bullshit it’s actually a very valuable role, it will facilitate change across the sector long term, but that salary?!? No chance!

SweetSakura · 16/12/2022 17:34

We've just had a restructure at work and they got rid of all the roles that were just meaningless fluff. And the same amount of work, if not more, is getting done

SweetSakura · 16/12/2022 17:36

I'd rather they just paid for more nurses. My "lived experience" is that what actually matters is enough well paid well treated medical staff

PearlclutchersInc · 16/12/2022 17:39

MrsDanversGlidesAgain · 16/12/2022 15:43

For someone who needs to be or have, and I quote

Compassion and empathy

A desire to reduce power dynamics

Courageous

Awareness of the complex issues of working across organisations and disciplines

A desire to build and sustain a lived experience workforce

Ability to work with high degree of autonomy and use own initiative

Ability to work flexibly and adapt quickly to changes/managing competing priorities

Drive to achieve high quality of work with significant attention to detail

Ability to critically analyse and manage own work

Exercise tact and diplomacy

They're not leaving themselves a lot of time as applications close at the end of Jan. The last five are a given for pretty much any office job.

Wonder what their budget is...... and what the local internal politics are.....it'll make all the difference to the success of the role.

I would think a lot of people will be watching with interest.

amicissimma · 16/12/2022 17:40

I currently have a relative in hospital, very frail.

Laxatives given. In view of frailty instructed to ring the bell to be taken to the toilet when need arises. Bell left out of reach.

Ward rings to the sound of unanswered bells from those who can reach them.

This is a snapshot of lived experience from last week.

Will these problems be solved by having someone sitting inputting data in an office on a a six figure salary? Or how about a bit of common sense and compassion and the extra nurses that that salary could cover?

Ineedachangerightnow · 16/12/2022 17:44

It seems like a nonsense role but reading the posts on here I can see it's needed.

For those saying it could pay for X number of clinical staff and the NHS should do away with senior management who do you think should do the strategy and policy work?

PlaitBilledDuckyPuss · 16/12/2022 17:48

Any fool could bullshit their way through that job spec. I'm tempted to apply myself!

amicissimma · 16/12/2022 17:48

"who do you think should do the strategy and policy work?"

Maybe fewer strategies and policies and more compassion and common sense from the people 'at the chalk face', using the salaries that would have paid for endless new strategies and policies to pay for enough staff to have time to apply their compassion and common sense.

SueVineer · 16/12/2022 17:49

ImJustMadAboutSaffron · 16/12/2022 15:31

It's high time the NHS axed the tiers of Trust positions and unnecessary, non medical advisors and administrators. There's a hierarchy of NHS fat cats milking the NHS and they need to be cleared out.

Yes this.

comical2023 · 16/12/2022 17:49

Actually it’s a hugely important role. It’s about building services which are developed by people who have actually got experience of what they’re doing. They want to build mental health services based on what people who have experienced mental health (for example) challenges to actually make services work rather than what they think might work. People who understand in practice what’s needed not just full of theory

londonmummy1966 · 16/12/2022 17:49

Couldn't they have 2 non-execs at board level and then a couple more therapists or nurses for the money? If the role is to have the voices of patients heard at a senior level wouldn't that achieve the same end and get some more staff on the ground

IntentionalError · 16/12/2022 17:52

lipstickwoman · 16/12/2022 15:31

More baloney. This is exactly why the nhs is on its knees. It doesn't need more funding. It needs a bloody overhaul

Am disgusted.

Absolutely correct. The NHS is NOT underfunded. It is badly run, dysfunctional, broken & failing. There is an obvious need for fundamental structural reforms, but no politicians of any party are brave enough to admit this, never mind actually doing anything about it. Wes Streeting is hinting at saying the unsayable, but we will see if this translates into actual reform.

We should be looking at the mixed public / private healthcare systems with universal insurance provision & competing providers in countries like Israel & Germany and learning from them.

JennyForeigner · 16/12/2022 17:52

pursuedbyablackdog · 16/12/2022 17:01

SnoringSnorlax how many back office staff are on £115K though?
I am a clinician. If they want the answers to their questions how about asking the patients and clinicians?
Here's the thing I work in therapies. Evidence based practice tells us the best outcomes for patients are high intensity therapy programs. The gold standard in my field would be 4/5 days a week (with rehab tasks carried out by the patient both after clinician led therapy and on non therapy days) for 4/6 weeks. How much of this am I able to provide? 1 or at the most 2 sessions of therapy followed by discharge. Totally ineffective! Do I rant talk to my manager about this? Of course I do, and the answer? "Sorry pursued but as you know there just isn't the funding and our waiting lists are constantly breaching guidelines, you'll just have to find away to worker harder and smarter".
Do you realise £115k would pay for 3 band 6 therapists? Do you know if I could work effectively I could make a real difference for my patients? But here's the thing those who decide where funding goes really aren't interested in 'well-being' data, because it's difficult to quantify.
Someone up thread said if this person going into post can effect change then it's money well spent, my response is 'yes, but how do they effect change with no further money for staffing?'
Reality is this; £115k post holder, goes into post all enthusiastic, says yes we need more nurses, more drs, more therapists, more pharmacist/ dieticans/ ophthalmologists/ more discharge coordinators etc, only to be told "provide the evidence". So now our postholder devises a form for all clinicians to fill out, accept the clinicians are really busy seeing pts and put the form to one side, which quickly goes to the bottom of the pile of the to do list. Now the postholder is getting thoroughly peeved, as they can't move forward with their brand new changes so they send a snappy email to the clinicians, who grudgingly fill out the form thinking fucksake we do this constantly and it never makes a change, now I'm running late for my next pt oh this again. Form finally gets completed and returns.
The post holder looks at the returns but realises the data is qualitative not quantitive. "Ah well" says the post holder "I'll take it to the meeting". At the meeting the post holder says in earnest "look evidence of what we need now can we have these extra staff" and the VIP chief exec. Laugh and point out that qualitative data is not evidence based and therefore no, you can't have more staff, you need to redesign your measures...
And so on and so forth. Eventually the £115k post holder gives up, realises it's a load of codswallop, but quite likes the salary and breakfast meetings so, continues to sit in a job making no changes whatsoever. Chief exec are happy as don't need to ask for more money, and actually can now show the strategic health authority that they can save money by getting rid of £115k job. The strategic health authority are happy, because they now have another pot of money to advertise for a job they want to give their mate Norman, whose had a bit of rough time, and Norman is happy because he's about to get a new job in a comfy heated office with new carpeting!
Meanwhile £115k post holder who has been doing the post for five years, and can see the job is failing can request early retirement, with a nice tidy retirement sum, and is happy.
Meanwhile those of at the coalface feel more and more frustrated that nothing changes and our patients continue to suffer.

applauds