I am quite sneezy at the moment, as it happens, but I don’t think that was the word you were aiming for.
Don’t embarrass yourself by announcing what my ‘subtext’ is.
I quite enjoyed your subsequent rant. It bore no relation to reality but at least it was funny. I see that you are one of those posters who loses an argument and resorts to making things up. Like the one who claimed that posters who thought that SW’s methods were a bit odd were “sneering at and shaming people trying to lose weight”.
No, I haven’t called anybody stupid. I challenged an ill-conceived argument that several people tried to make in different ways.
No, I didn’t say that anyone paying to go to a slimming club is stupid.
No, I haven’t mentioned ‘processed crap’ once.
No, I don’t ‘just want to prove them wrong’. I asked a question which nobody has answered properly. The question was, why label a food as ‘free’ when members are supposed to restrict the amount they eat. I concluded that it’s a marketing ploy.
It's the equivalent of me claiming that calorie counting causes eating disorders, and alcoholics might think it's ok to drink their calories because calories in/calories out etc.
Eh? You’ve invented a load of spurious old nonsense and announced that that is what I think? That’s rather a stretch. You must be desperate to defend your beloved SW, eh?