@Malie But, accordingly to your beliefs, God let these misogynistic beliefs develop in the Bedouin ( and other) societies. Trying to tweak it a bit ( whilst still firmly locating women as property of men as the Ten Commandments do) , then tweaking it a bit more 2000 years later hardly makes God a proponent of woman’s rights. He could, after all, have intervened at the start of human society to be clear about women’s equality. Instead of letting untold women and girls suffer.unimaginably for millennia.
And of course, these improvements were only told to one society, even if God saw his ‘improvements’ as a good thing, he sure wasn’t keen to accelerate them around the world.
You are right that I cannot locate in my mind the specific passage against rape you refer too. However all the passages in the OT I have read in relation to men raping women, are firmly viewing women as the property of Fathers and Husbands. The rape is therefore a violation/ damage. of the male’s property, not of the mind and body of the women in question. Rape is not a women’s rights issue to the author of those texts. Indeed, despite the ‘two thousand years of Christian civiliisation’ your refer to, marital rape was legal in nearly all of these ( following the belief of Christian society that the body of the woman is the property of the husband, as reflected in those OT texts). Marital rape was finally made illegal thanks to the feminism based on a secular system of ideas, and the campaigning of those secular feminists. It is not thanks to Christianity than women have the rights they do now, but thanks to secular feminism.
And you have been clear that you think those who disagree with you have not read or studied the Bible, but I have studied the old and New Testament at A/Level and spent three years studying the Old Testament and systematic theology at degree level, as well as continuing to read and learn informally after that.