Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Chat

Join the discussion and chat with other Mumsnetters about everyday life, relationships and parenting.

Vardy has lost

128 replies

Viviennemary · 29/07/2022 12:05

Yes. Good decision. I thought she might win. What a fiasco and waste of money

OP posts:
OneFrenchEgg · 29/07/2022 20:35

Rooney was the defendant so won't get any damages. Vardy will have to pay her legal costs, although that will still leave Rooney substantially out of pocket.

Oh I hadn't followed it very closely, had assumed there was some sort of counter claim involved.

Sunnysideup · 29/07/2022 21:07

Cuck00soup · 29/07/2022 19:42

the vardies are multi multi millionaires. Why the fuck was she selling stories for paltryamounts of money about people who trusted her to the sun

Because she wanted to be top Wag.

Why she wanted to be top wag mind, is beyond me.

I don’t think it’s that simple, she did yes, but you can see on her text exchanges when giving one bit of info she texts “I want paying for that” . So she was to some extent Doing it for money as well. But it’s like a couple of hundred quid. It’s nothing.

it’s clear she was jealous of Colleen and that drove part of her behaviour, and she had no love for any of them she was selling any info she could get, on anyone she could get it on, and she wanted to be top wag as well. Like the master manipulator.

the whole thing points to a very grabby jealous unhappy narcissistic egotistical dishonest manipulative greedy woman. It’s really awful behaviour to all their social circle and his colleagues.

CallmeAngelina · 29/07/2022 21:28

I think it's quite telling that Jamie Vardy was barely seen in court at all, supporting his wife. He turned up for one day I think, possibly because he had to give evidence??? (Correct me if I'm wrong on that).
Wayne, on the other hand, was there virtually every day. He didn't look thrilled about it, to be honest, but he turned up nonetheless. Perhaps Colleen was collecting her dues from him...

buggybugs · 29/07/2022 21:30

If lawyers refused to represent very stupid people, they'd all be out of a job. Rebecca Vardy is dangerously thick. Dangerous, because she doesn't realise how thick she actually is.

MuffinMcLayLikeABundleOfHay · 29/07/2022 21:30

Want that something to do with Wayne Rooney's team had finished their season but Jamie Vardy was still working.

MuffinMcLayLikeABundleOfHay · 29/07/2022 21:31

*wasn't that

CallmeAngelina · 29/07/2022 21:35

@MuffinMcLayLikeABundleOfHay If that was the case, then it was very unfortunate for Rebekah. Bad optics. It looked like he was distancing himself from her theatrics.

prh47bridge · 29/07/2022 21:38

CallmeAngelina · 29/07/2022 21:28

I think it's quite telling that Jamie Vardy was barely seen in court at all, supporting his wife. He turned up for one day I think, possibly because he had to give evidence??? (Correct me if I'm wrong on that).
Wayne, on the other hand, was there virtually every day. He didn't look thrilled about it, to be honest, but he turned up nonetheless. Perhaps Colleen was collecting her dues from him...

Ok, I'll correct you! Smile

Jamie Vardy did not give evidence. He did, however, turn up on the day Wayne Rooney gave evidence.

HastaLaBisto · 29/07/2022 21:41

Wayne Rooney has morphed into a human Toby jug.

ladygindiva · 29/07/2022 21:50

NashvilleQueen · 29/07/2022 19:48

There's some bullshit thinking on this thread.

Firstly the exposure of RV by CR was in 2019. She wasn't to know we would have a cost of living crisis, a war in Ukraine and a pandemic in a few years time. She did nothing wrong by exposing RV who had betrayed her trust and I don't blame her for a moment. I would imagine it's hard work knowing who you can and can't trust in those circles. RV sold stories for money. Like being married to Jamie Vardy didn't generate enough for an income for her. And to The Sun who every scouser hates with a passion. No wonder CR was furious. So all this 'haven't they got better things to be worrying about' is a bit unfair.

The defamation trial was brought by RV against CR. It's clear that CR was right in her deduction that RV was responsible so she had to defend herself when RV wouldn't settle. It was pointed out by the judge that the cost of the proceedings was disproportionate to any award for RV even if she won but still she persisted. I'm sure CR had better stuff to be dealing with than attending the High Court in the full glare of the media.

This is all on RV. You may not like WAGS. You may not like CR. But she's done absolutely nothing wrong here and her statement today was modest and reasonable.

Fully agree with this

BaconAndCheeseOatcake · 29/07/2022 22:13

CallmeAngelina · 29/07/2022 21:28

I think it's quite telling that Jamie Vardy was barely seen in court at all, supporting his wife. He turned up for one day I think, possibly because he had to give evidence??? (Correct me if I'm wrong on that).
Wayne, on the other hand, was there virtually every day. He didn't look thrilled about it, to be honest, but he turned up nonetheless. Perhaps Colleen was collecting her dues from him...

That's just to do with one still working and the other not though, isn't it?

Sunnysideup · 29/07/2022 22:38

I also found the judges comments very surprising. She pretty much harpooned vardy and called her out as a liar and She clearly stated that vardy and her agent were in cahoots and behind the leaks. She didn’t mess around or sugar coat it.

vardy won’t appeal, that’s just talk, she was never going to come out and say shit the judge got it right I’m guilty as fuck and she’s proven herself a dishonest woman, who lies at whim.

the issue she also now has is she will be fully ostracised by his colleagues and the other wags, and he will to some extent also, as folks won’t believe he didn’t know. It will damage bis relationships with his team mates, no one will trust him either or want to socialise with them.

colleen on the other hand, actually comes out of it looking smart and dignified, and with a set of balls on her.

Davros · 29/07/2022 23:15

I remember seeing a documentary CR made years ago about hospices because she had a sister who died in one (I think). I thought very highly of her then and I've got no reason since to think otherwise. Apart from her husband playing for Man sodding Utd!

LetHimHaveIt · 29/07/2022 23:18

I sincerely doubt any of Vardy's Leicester colleagues have been labouring under any delusions, as far as their opinion of Rebekah is concerned: she's long been seen as a self-serving and manipulative piece of work. JV is very much in the twilight of his career, anyway. Hasn't played for England in ages, while Leicester's spell in the sun is essentially over. The dynamic of their relationship is very odd, but I still think he'll be livid about all this.

frazzledasarock · 30/07/2022 10:28

I think the judge worded the judgement such that any attempts by RV to appeal are scuppered immediately, because the judge has made it crystal clear that RV & her agent have lied and deliberately destroyed incriminating evidence.

the judge has left no room for her judgement to be misinterpreted by an appeal panel.

it was incredibly foolish on RV’s part to take it to trial.

CloseYourEyesAndSee · 30/07/2022 11:29

Florenz · 29/07/2022 15:08

The WAGS are so tedious. I wish they would go away. I wish footballers would stop marrying and going out with such vapid women.

most of them are also vapid stupid men so 🤷🏼‍♀️

Sunnysideup · 30/07/2022 12:16

frazzledasarock · 30/07/2022 10:28

I think the judge worded the judgement such that any attempts by RV to appeal are scuppered immediately, because the judge has made it crystal clear that RV & her agent have lied and deliberately destroyed incriminating evidence.

the judge has left no room for her judgement to be misinterpreted by an appeal panel.

it was incredibly foolish on RV’s part to take it to trial.

I don’t think you can just appeal becayse you don’t like the verdict, there needs to be grounds, and it doesn’t seem there is.I think they’d hVe to prove the judge screwed up in sone way and she didn’t. There will be no appeal.

prh47bridge · 31/07/2022 11:13

Sunnysideup · 30/07/2022 12:16

I don’t think you can just appeal becayse you don’t like the verdict, there needs to be grounds, and it doesn’t seem there is.I think they’d hVe to prove the judge screwed up in sone way and she didn’t. There will be no appeal.

Correct. Vardy is saying that she won't appeal, but if she did, she would have to show that the judge had made an error in law (which she clearly hasn't), or the judge didn't follow the right process (e.g. she allowed evidence which should have been excluded), or the decision was perverse (i.e. entirely unsupported by the weight of the evidence).

The starting point is that the trial is not a dress rehearsal. It is the first and last night of the show. The Court of Appeal will overturn a judge's findings of fact unless they are clearly at odds with the evidence. In particular, the judge's findings that Vardy is an unreliable witness and that significant parts of her evidence were not credible (polite way of saying she was lying through her teeth) stands, along with her finding that Rooney was an honest and reliable witness.

Even if there was new evidence, it would have to be compelling and something that could not have been discovered before the trial for the Court of Appeal to admit it.

As is normal, the judge has set out her reasoning in arriving at her judgement clearly. My view is that Vardy is right not to appeal. Any attempt would be doomed to failure.

Quia · 31/07/2022 11:43

GiantKitten · 29/07/2022 19:18

The judgment does say that CR should have approached RV directly once she knew it was her account that was seeing and leaking the fake stories; even though RV would very likely have denied it, she should have been given the chance to own up and prevent CR going public with it.
So that will probably somewhat reduce the amount of costs CR gets.
It will still cost RV well into 7 figures…

Not sure that will affect costs. Rooney offered a "drop hands" settlement. Assuming her lawyers used the appropriate procedure - and they're bound to have - the usual outcome is that if the other side insists on continuing and doesn't achieve anything better, then it must bear all the costs from the date they refused or the offer expired. So conduct before then won't affect anything.

ImAvingOops · 31/07/2022 12:01

If vardy did try to appeal, would the same legal team have to represent her or are they allowed to wash their hands of it her

prh47bridge · 31/07/2022 15:58

ImAvingOops · 31/07/2022 12:01

If vardy did try to appeal, would the same legal team have to represent her or are they allowed to wash their hands of it her

She can drop them. They cannot drop her.

Pedallleur · 31/07/2022 16:14

How long has this case been going? Prob 2 yrs or more so before the cost of living crisis. But that's it for Vardy. As a brand prob untouchable. Her reputation if she had one is damaged and someone has to pay poss £1 million plus. Even in her world it's a big chunk of money to achieve a 75 page report calling you a liar.

Hopefullysoon2022 · 31/07/2022 17:22

Imagine being Vardys friend.
You could never trust her.

Wasn't she caught taking pictures of Sarah Harding handbag.

Wonder if Jamies shelf life expired now or will she stick with him.

SheldonesqueTheBstard · 31/07/2022 17:27

They have their star turn if they want to resurrect Celebrity Big Brother…

It would put a few quid in the coffers.

prh47bridge · 31/07/2022 17:43

Pedallleur · 31/07/2022 16:14

How long has this case been going? Prob 2 yrs or more so before the cost of living crisis. But that's it for Vardy. As a brand prob untouchable. Her reputation if she had one is damaged and someone has to pay poss £1 million plus. Even in her world it's a big chunk of money to achieve a 75 page report calling you a liar.

Vardy started legal action in June 2020. So yes, the case took just over 2 years.