Mujtaba (Mij) Rahman AT Mij_Europe
President Emmanuel Macron said today in the ruins of Irpin, a Kyiv suburb devastated by Russia, that France stood “unambiguously” on the side of Ukraine which had been subjected to “Russian barbarism.” 1/
“Today it is essential that Ukraine can resist and that Ukraine can win,” Macron said. “We stand without ambiguity at the side of the men and women of Ukraine.” 2/
This marks a radical (and welcome) shift in Macron’s tone & rhetoric but not – French officials say – a change of approach. Macron has always been wholly committed to Ukraine, but also believes that peace negotiations must be possible at some point on terms acceptable to Kyiv 3/
But Macron’s words on a long-awaited visit to Ukraine do represent a recognition that some of the President’s recent remarks on the war have been too abstract and neutral. He has said on several occasions that Russia should not be “humiliated” without explaining what he meant 4/
So Paris sees visit as an opp to correct impression Macron is “soft on Russia.” And AT PedderSophie reports a French diplo source saying: “We are in favour of a total victory with the restoring of the territorial integrity of all territory conquered by Russia, including Crimea.” 5/
This goes further than a statement made by Macron during a visit to Bucharest yesterday, where he said.. 6/
“At some point, when we have helped Ukraine to resist - and I hope win the war - and when above all the fighting can stop, we will have to negotiate and the Ukrainian president and his colleagues will have to negotiate with Russia.” 7/
The two statements appear to be at odds with one another. If the whole of Ukrainian territory is to be restored, there appears to be little room for negotiation. However,“being in favour” of something is not the same as believing that you can achieve it 8/
Macron is toughening France public rhetoric in face of criticism: but he remains convinced that, at some point, talks will Russia will be possible on terms Kyiv can accept.
The alternative argument – that war must go on until Russia is somehow crushed – is he believes dangerous ENDS
I'm not sure who has said about crushing Russia... but still.