Oh absoluetely, I think they have a lot to say on a lot of subjects.
But war is the most extreme of all things, and whilst you can do an important role which isn't on the front line as part of war, you still need people to defend you and others who can't defend themselves.
My Aunt and Uncle, often by deliberate choice, have lived a very sheltered life. My cousins have a very strange and distorted view of the world as a result. Its wholesome and in many respects disconnected to the stresses of many of the things we have in our modern lives. I am a similar age to my cousins, and I was always very acutely aware of how hard they found it to relate to anyone of a similar age who wasn't part of their immediate community. I, on the other hand, had cultural and social reference points that I could/can share with most people of a certain age.
Is it better?
I don't know.
I think in many ways I view them as having almost 'opted out' of many things, including seeing the imperfections of the world. I think there is value in seeing this and understanding that not everyone has the luxury of being able to make the choices they have, because they are just trying to survive. Few actively choose to fight for their country, purely for patrotism - more often its because its a way to escape a life where there are few opportunities and options available to them.
I think I have always found it some what separatist and a rejection of the world in a sort of almost aloof way. Not intentionally so, but thats what it becomes in practice.
I think its a noble set of values but I also think it misses the really crucial key questions too. I guess we all have our own blind spots though.