So unless she was murdered in hospital, in front of several witnesses including the medics fighting to save her, and despite already being technically dead, I can't understand for the life of me how this theory has come about.
You really don’t think somebody could have slipped her a pill or added something to a legitimate medication? No need for a gun or anything dramatic. If the RF had gone to all the trouble of engineering the crash, it would be very easy to kill somebody – and not be suspected when that person’s life was already seriously in jeopardy. Also, HCPs are people just like anybody else and some people are willing to do terrible things. I don’t know any of the team present that day and I’m not in the least accusing them of anything, but it wouldn’t be beyond the realms of possibility in such a scenario for somebody to be corruptible. Not even that, necessarily, if they had insisted that her ‘personal doctor’ needed a minute alone with her.
I don't see why finding the passport of a person who was on a plane, who would undoubtedly have had their passport with them, near the crash site is so extraordinary? All sorts of things do survive an event like that.
Was a pretty much intact paper passport not found in the wreckage of incinerated metal? Is that really likely? Even if it were, it’s an extremely convenient Scooby Doo-type ‘clue’ for a criminal to have kindly left behind.
There’s a theory that JFK was shot by one of the people protecting him by accident. I can’t remember the documentary but it was very convincing!
As with the Titanic and the powerful opponents of the establishing of the Federal Reserve who died on it, JFK had angered a lot of bankers by issuing Executive Order 11110, which had the potential to do a huge amount of damage to their whole system and multi-billion profits.
When a thread contains Holocaust denial (I’m not quoting the post, because that kind of rubbish shouldn’t be repeated - ever), it rather proves how dangerous conspiracy theories are.
Sorry, but that is completely false logic. Plenty of threads of all kinds have people saying crazy/ridiculous/deeply offensive things on them – and that’s exactly what the MNHQ delete function is for. Do you really think it dangerous for people to question official accounts on everything - including even something like the shadow cabinet challenging the motives and honesty of the governing party - just because one person decides to hijack a discussion and make outrageous and offensive claims?
Jill Dando was killed by the Serb government in response to our previous bombing of a Serb TV station in which one of their presenters died. I’m sure of it. It makes more sense than that some random executed a rapid, accurate shooting and vanished
I believe it very likely that Barry George was framed from the start. Jill herself was harmless and, I think, very well-intentioned, but she had friends and colleagues who may have been involved in seriously dark things. I heard a suggestion that she was about to raise concerns, which would have indirectly shone light on these people and their goings-on. Why do you think so many people knew what Savile was up to, but never dared to go public about it – including one particular person who has made it her life’s legacy to campaign for the protection of children? Maybe one or two people did do exactly that and met ‘unfortunate’ circumstances very shortly after. There were also theories that Mike Smith and Rik Mayall’s deaths could have been connected with their raising issues that powerful people didn’t want raised.
Can I say, as I say to incoming first year undergraduates every year, that ‘doing your research’ and ‘random Googling’ are not synonyms?
That is very true – BUT, equally, there does exist a certain snobbery around information discovered and shared online. Some people will still dismissively say “Oh, is that something you read on the internet ?!” regardless of the credibility of the source on the world’s main platform for sharing knowledge and information. You hear people scoff at those worried about their health who have “consulted Dr Google, have you?” – even though the information they have researched may have all come from the NHS website and similar.