'How many people on this thread have suffered a sexual offense from a transgender woman?
Instead of hypothising perhaps it's better to be realistic and honest?'
Hold on just a sec.
Your identity is how you feel. I can't see into other people's heads. How would I have any idea of anyone's gender ID whether they assault me or not.
Similarly. According to stonewall definitions I am trans. I have experienced a raft of shit in my life from people I assumed were male (but who can say as you can't see inside someone's head).
So actually all the incidents from men (?) should be seen as crimes against a trans person? And by people who I could not say what gender they were (their sex is irrelevant).
It could have been a lot of trans on trans crime? I mean who can say. I didn't ask them their gender id at the time and they didn't ask mine. An oversight?
Those 29 people with male names arrested for sexual abusing one girl over a7 year period.
Who knows that their internal gender id is. Has anyone asked? Or the girl? The BBC has decided to use sex based meanings of man and girl here I assume. Or maybe I'm wrong.
It could be 29 women who did that. If only they'd asked.
The child could be any identity. Or sex.
But could those 29 people be women?
I think I'm so angry today due to reading that. Fucking hell.
And if that girl does put it behind her, get qualifications etc. And applies for a job at ops work. All good! She will be declined a job due to the fact that she had suffered grotesquely at the hands of men for YEARS and their mental health checking is apparently so intrusive. That even if she gets through all the interviews and into the more expensive vetting. They will REFUSE her a job because as a child she was violated by a very large group of men for years and therefore her mental health is automatically poor and employment is denied.
That's how it works right OP?