I can't help feeling that in the last decade, other issues to economic ones have found a space and attracted support. The old style socialist/ capitalist construct doesn't seem to be relevant.
We've had Brexit: resistance to being told what to do about laws by an outsider organisation. We've had ecological issues, majorly: these can be taken on to suit agendas. We have had wokism; we've had anti-being told what to do by central government - that is the anti-mask/ anti-vaccine protesters, obviously, and also devolutionists who want greater powers for Scots and Welsh and local councils and not to be told what to do.
It almost seems as though the Universal Credit and tax credits, and even NHS may be working ok, and doing a sound job to level up and top up people's incomes, because I'm just not hearing outraged voices about a dire NHS, or low wages. If making ends meet were an issues in Hartlepool, wouldn't people vote Labour? I would ( and do) if hard- up because the social equality agenda makes Labour a better bet: even if you're not sure what the policies will be, you can assume.
The young seem to be poorer compared with years ago, and struggle to get the jobs they want and to get on the housing ladder. But everybody else - are they?
I'm even wondering whether the rise in social media means people don't do so much physically: eat out, dance out, date out, and so don't spend money on clothes and entertainment and don't need to. I actually don't understand the Hatlepool-Tory phenomenon.
I feel we are into a populist era where strong character make impact and attract votes, so Kier Starmer is not looking like a leader, at all, to me. He looks unsure, apologetic; his body language doesn't match his rhetoric .
I think a policy on cheaper housing, really well-constructed and planned to be large-scale would unite woke and traditional working class, in seeking it, anyway.