@ColinSupporter
“I don’t think libraries are an essential service (we could install some computer terminals in other buildings if necessary)
Do you not know what a library is?“
Yes. But the only convincing argument I hear for why they are needed is so people can access the internet, computers etc to access state provided services, job hunt etc. I don’t see the point of them for the provision of actual paper books - I don’t see a need for actual paper books at all really except maybe for little children.
I don’t see the point of them for the provision of actual paper books - I don’t see a need for actual paper books at all really except maybe for little children.
Good grief.
I can only imagine that either you place no great store on reading or you live in some kind of high-tech bubble where you only ever read something that's available on a kindle.
While I now have the privilege of not needing to worry about money too much there were certainly times when I was younger that I definitely didn't have the money to spare to pay for books. During those times, my local library was a real lifeline to me, I was able to get access to a wide range of books without it costing me anything.
From your statement, it seems that you want reading to be confined to only those members of society that can afford to pay for a kindle and the ebooks to go on it?
By the way, ebooks are often more expensive than actual books.
Just one example, is the re-release of Terry Pratchett's first novel from 50 years ago.
On Amazon, the paperback price is £3.49 but the kindle version is £4.99
Or the first novel by Richard Osman, "The Thursday Murder Club" which is currently the bestselling book in the UK according to the Sunday Times Bestsellers List (although only number three according to WHSmith)
The hardback price on Amazon is £7.49 but the kindle price is £9.99
Seriously? An ebook is more expensive than the hardback version?