@Happinessisawarmcervix
It’s sad to read how many of these arseholes get away with it because group leaders/tutors/chairs won’t address the behaviour.
It's enraging, isn't it? Espeically if they don't do it because they're worried about bad feedback. What about the feedback from the rest of the class?!
Two spring to mind for me.
When pregnant with my first, I went to a two hour breastfeeding class at the hospital in the middle of the day. I went alone, one woman was there with her mum, one there alone, one there with her husband. Let's call that last pair Mr and Mrs Crank.
We only got through half the material in two hours because Mr and Mrs Crank were having their second and EVERYTHING the tutor mentioned was brought back to how Mrs Crank had struggled to breastfeed her first and had spent A YEAR HAND PUMPING so he could be fed exclusively on breastmilk anyway. She didn't even buy an electric pump and treated us all to detailed renditions of how many minutes she had to pump each day, squeezing the SINGLE HAND PUMP on each breast at work while typing with the other hand. Tutor mentions benefits of breastfeeding? Mrs Crank expounds at length on how that's why she went to such great efforts with her first. Tutor mentions breastfeeding support groups available? Oh, well, there weren't any of those two years ago when Mrs Crank had her first and was struggling so much.
The other there-alone mum left on the dot - maybe even early? The with-her-mum mum and I left after an extra twenty minutes. Goodness only knows when Mr and Mrs Crank left. I was appalled that the tutor let it go on. Wish I'd spoken up, but there never seemed to be a moment, and (surprisingly!) the two hours went by so fast I hadn't realised it was going to end up overruning so much/not covering so much material. I filled in the feedback questionnaire pretty fulsomely, though... If you're a tutor and it's your job (rather than a vague hobby group volunteer leader) then part of what you're being paid for is to shut cranks up.
The second was a recreational philosophy discussion group. I was expecting robust but pleasant and open debate. What we got was Roy (not his real name, but someone mentioned an overabundance of Roys upthread!) turning EVERY SINGLE topic into a belligerent explanation of why religious people were idiots and God couldn't possibly exist. I wasn't even especially religious at the time, and of course one would expect different sides on every debate topic, but I mean EVERY SINGLE topic. Can we be sure reality exists? Well, we can be sure God doesn't and religious people are idiots. What is a just war? Well, not a religious one because religious people are idiots and God doesn't exist.
I think I went twice then never ever again. And they wondered why they didn't get many new people staying! "Oh, that's just Roy..." Yeah, that's just Roy, being a knob to everyone.
I've since resolved to, at the very least, tell people WHY I leave groups if it is down to a Mr and Mrs Crank or a Roy. Usually afterwards by polite email: "I had a lovely time at penguin knitting/Womble hunting/underwater basket weaving group, but I didn't really feel it was for me. Roy is obviously a longstanding member and I didn't really feel I got on with him, so I think I might look around for a group that's more suited to me." Not rude, so I won't be dismissed as the crank, but lets them know that Roy is the reason I left.