What people are missing is it is not about if she’s also an abuser, the fundamental proven fact is he is. She is a victim of domestic violence, now if she is also guilty of domestic abuse, then let’s see it proven. Not something based on her abusers word.
And that doesn’t include hitting him back one time when he was hitting her. No one in the right mind says if a domestic abuse violence victim hits back one time she’s an abuser and it means her own abuser is justified. No one.
I just don’t get this, we see women appalled at the thought of domestic violence, but it seems it’s only appalling if the bloke beating his wife isn’t rich, famous, or someone you like. If he is someone rich famous or someone you like, and even worse if he has a younger attractive wife, then he can crack on and beat her as far as some are concerned
I wonder if the judge who made this decision is also getting trolled.