@ISaySteadyOn
I don't get it either. I am on the side of letting everybody lead their life as they see fit with regards to reasonable law. I want everyone to have access to libraries, gyms, museums, theatres, and yes, pubs. How is that selfish?
Not selfish to me.
Ultimately to a large extent, if you want a quiet, reclusive life you can go and have it. Employment is the most awkward factor, but socially no one has ever actually forced social interractions on others. There has always been the word "no".
If you were of the persuasion of wanting to stay in, get deliveries, quarantine/ santitise them, deregister the kids from school and homeschool them, WFH and have no social interractions, go ahead knock yourself out. It's my opinion that such an extreme is not a healthy way for the vast majority to live, but hey it's an opinion, and I value the rights that we have in this country to publically express them, unlike the much reverred China (having been to Hong Kong, China and Tibet, it concerns me greatly that Hong Kong is being assimilated into the same oppresion like the rest of China)
Just don't let your fear dictate that everyone else must succumb to your opinion.
(Obviously a general "you" and not applicable to any ADs)
While half of MN probably has me down as an anti-mask crackpot (OK, I hate the things on a multitude of levels). I think there are places where their supposed benefits are not sufficient to outweigh the consequences e.g. not in school classrooms, but public transport is more reasonable) I might even think that somebody wearing one in the middle of nowhere is not very well informed about the benefits of masks and general risks of spread. But I will not bay to have someone stripped of the right to wear one just because I have a difference of opinion.
I feel for the workers now being forced to go through the discomfort of wearing them for prolonged periods. Very different to having the option avaliable.