Delatron I think most of us are concerned about child abuse, domestic violence, attainment gaps, children getting drawn into county lines and other drug related behaviours, an increase in crime, damage to mental health, the impending recession, increased levels of poverty, increased levels of homelessness and goodness knows what else.
Yep, the lockdown was too late, not strong enough and is a mess caused by the incompetent, self-interested govt in power.
But here we are and we can't revisit the past. We need to learn as much as possible and avoid making the same mistakes again. If the 23 March lock down was 'too late and half-hearted' why is it, just two months later when the UK has the highest number of deaths, the highest level of newly identified cases of CV19 in Europe, such a great idea to consider permitting hundreds of thousands of children, parents and school staff to congregate for hours of the day inside and then go and mix with others on public transport, in shops and workplaces?
If we need to stop talking about when schools are 'safe', are you suggesting that we just stop bothering with any risk assessments? We don't particularly factor safety into schooling, workplaces going forward? Or is it just the risk of contracting or spreading CV19 that we shouldn't bother about anymore.
There are thousands of children in the UK who need to shield - what do you suggest they do? Ditto the tens of thousands of teachers? Should schools still open if there aren't enough staff to cover classes, or enough classrooms to comply with the guidance about separated 'bubbles'?
So easy to say that 'schools must open'. So hard to even suggest in the abstract how this can happen at the moment.