The point I was making is that forcing someone to wear clothing characteristic of a gender they do not identify with is demeaning. I'm sure you would agree that forcing a person identifying as a man (regardless of body sex) to wear a dress and heels would not be appropriate. Ditto expecting someone female identified to wear trousers.
Actually I don't fully agree with you.
Firstly, the point that I, and I believe the person you were originally replying to, was making is that women wear trousers and gender-neutral outfits all the time. Furthermore we modify what we wear to avoid trouble (I.e. male violence) all the time. I don't think the person you were replying to meant you should wear men's clothing. I think they were suggesting that you could lower the risk that you perceive if you wore less obviously femised clothes. They can still be from female clothing manufacturers and female lines, still 100% female clothing.
Again, women wear trousers. Women's trousers. All the time. You can wear what you want, but let's have a bit more nuance then "trousers are for men". They most certainly are not, and actually it's pretty darn offensive to all women since the 1940s to say that they are. We wore them to take on "men's jobs" in WWI and WWII, decided that we liked them and working in jobs that weren't strictly defined by our sex, and fought heavily to be able to wear what we want and work in whatever jobs we want to.
I don't think forcing men to wear a dress and heels is any more appropriate than forcing women to wear a dress and heels, no. Heels are AWFUL for your feet and back, dresses are impractical and we want our dangerous pockets back while we are at it! Pencil skirts, high heels, fitted jackets and fitted dresses or skirts all restrict movement in ways that menswear generally doesn't. Restricted embodiment - it might show off the female figure (reducing us to sex objects again, yuck), but it is physically disempowering, which is also mentally disempowering. Women's clothing has been political for decades, and it's still a problem, still disempowering us right from newborn babies. So no, I don't think men OR women should be forced to wear this shit. I think everybody should have the freedom to choose to wear menswear or womenswear as they wish, and I think it should be normalised completely. The way that's going to happen is for men to wear skirts and heels if they wish, by the way - like this chap: https://metro.co.uk/2020/10/19/straight-married-dad-has-been-wearing-skirts-and-heels-to-work-for-years-to-challenge-gender-norms-13446579/ . More like him please!
Also to note that in certain situations trousers, boiler suits, stout boots etc are an absolute must for both sexes for safety reasons - and that there are many situations where anybody wearing a skirt has a high risk of public indecency. Do you think it is inappropriate to insist that women who want to go horseriding should wear trousers? Do you think that it is inappropriate to insist that women who want to take an exercise class should wear either trousers or shorts? Same question but for female electricians, plumbers, builders and gas engineers?