I think maybe i should have said chosen to follow jesus, sorry my fault for not clarifying! ITss not denied by most historians that jesus existed, and its for people to decide whether or not he is the son of god. On the basis of the evidence i have read (the bible), i am satisfied he is.
Sorry, I genuinely don't understand. Are you saying that someone could "choose to follow Jesus" without actually believing? What would that look like? I still don't see how it is a choice? Unless the choice is for a non-believer to ignore what they actually think and just go through the motions as if they believe? To try and bury their actual view of the truth under layers of affirmation about faith? For a non-believer, the "evidence" provided by the bible is not at all convincing because it's totally circular - how can the bible be evidence of its own truth?
I am actually quite envious of those who have a faith, and of the comfort and community which they derive from that, (though I rather pity those who buy into the misogynistic, homophobic versions of faith), but I do not accept that there is free will in such matters - you cannot make a choice to believe in something that you consider to be nonsense. You either believe it or you don't.
So if your God is real (and I do not believe that he is), I would ask you to consider the possibility that faith is a gift, not a choice. And if that is the case, I would ask you why a loving God would not give that gift - which is apparently necessary for our eternal salvation - to all of his children? Why only the favoured few?