@AlexaShutUp
Does it ever make you doubtful?
I suspect that the OP is not quite secure enough in her faith to be able to own up to any doubts or misgivings. She seems to subscribe to a very simplistic version of Christianity. In one way, I guess I can understand the attraction of that, but it doesn't stand up to much scrutiny.
I have much more respect for people like @boymum9, who are at least honest enough with themselves to admit that some things don't make sense. Choosing to accept a certain level of cognitive dissonance because you derive peace and comfort from being part of a religion is fair enough. Doing mental gymnastics to convince yourself that it all makes sense when it clearly doesn't just suggests that you are in denial.
I agree. I have far more respect for those of any faith who acknowledge the elements of cognitive dissonance and handwaving, and who are honest about the fact that, for them, the benefits outweigh these.
Someone I met who had become a christian recently said to me, you don't have anything to lose believing in a god who turns out not to be real, but you have everything to lose if you choose not to believe and god is real.
OP, this was famously said by Pascal, the 17thc French philosopher/mathematician, but it's often misunderstood as an attempt to convince atheists to embrace belief, whereas in fact he was demonstrating that you can't use logical arguments to prove or disprove the existence of a god.
Voltaire also points out that Pascal was himself a Jansenist, who believed that only a tiny proportion, even of believers, were destined to for salvation, and that this was predestined before they were born. So you could believe to the utmost of your being, love God, do good works, and live a life of justice and charity, and still, after your death, discover that you were not 'saved' by a God who turns out to exist, but not to be interested in some of his creation.
Other commentators have pointed out that in order to win Pascal's 'bet', you would need confirmation that God intends to honour his side of the bargain. Otherwise you're in the same position as someone who says 'Bet you £200 that the Spurs* will win 2-0', but when Spurs do win 2-0 his friend points out that he never accepted the bet and hence has no obligation to pay up. 
*Not suggesting God is a Spurs supporter. Insert your own team of preference.