Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AMA

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

I'm a trans man and local trans activist, AMA

999 replies

Sideris · 05/01/2020 07:10

Hi there, folks.

As the title says, I'm here to respond to questions in good nature.

For a bit of background information, I'm 30 years old, a trans activist out of necessity (being the first 'out' trans person in numerous spaces, which didn't have any rules or regulations before, but have since been commended for ease of process by some new trans members or trans members who have been referred by me), have been 'passing' for about three years, now.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
forkfun · 06/01/2020 13:16

"They say it is due to what is written on their birth certificate, that they caused to change, seemingly confusing cause and effect."

Quite. Surely by that logic a newborn girl who accidentally had 'male' ticked on their birth certificate was male. There is an absolute denial of biological reality from the OP.

I think everyone should have the right to dress and live how they want. Change your name. Change your pronouns. Change your body. But denying that if you were born as a female human (gametes, chromosomes, the lot) is bizarre.

Winesalot · 06/01/2020 13:24

Pulpfiction

I was wondering about the effect on mood that testosterone has, as I have been researching this for menopausal issues. The OP says her mh improved when she started testosterone. How much does this play a part In improving mental health in general, including feeling stronger in body as well as mind.

I’d love to know?

SentimentalKiller · 06/01/2020 13:28

I'm sure I read somewhere that testosterone is a mood enhancer. Until it wrecks the body

HerRoyalFattyness · 06/01/2020 13:32

Testosterone can actually help produce serotonin, so yes, testosterone boosts mood.

Cwenthryth · 06/01/2020 13:41

Is there any evidence that testosterone actually has an effect on mental disorders or is it having some sort of placebo effect
Testosterone (& oestrogen, progesterone & other sex hormones) can absolutely have significant impacts on mental health, look at how women can be impacted by menopause, types of depression or psychosis influenced by menstruation, or plain old PMS. Testosterone is a mood enhancer (via serotonin). I’m out and about at the mo but have read medical articles on this and have them stashed somewhere (own MH issues hence the interest).

It’s really no surprise that anyone ‘feels better’ with increased testosterone levels.

Cwenthryth · 06/01/2020 13:47

Meant to add the mental health issues that can come from anabolic steroid use in there as well.

Cwenthryth · 06/01/2020 13:48

Or misuse/abuse, rather.

SDTGisAnEvilWolefGenius · 06/01/2020 13:48

” If there is an uptick of offenses at Target, that sounds like Target should work on improving the safety of their company”

Now this I can agree with 100%, @Sideris - and they should do it by going BACK to changing rooms segregated by sex!

Allowing self-ID WILL make it immeasurably easier for Male predators to gain access to women’s sex segregated spaces, and WILL lead to more offences against women and girls - but that clearly does not matter at all to @Sideris. Women and girls suffering harm and trauma is an acceptable price to pay for trans rights, in the trans activist handbook.

NumbersStation · 06/01/2020 13:51

@Michelleoftheresistance

Isn’t it amazing how the entitled can justify anything?

So trans people cannot rape and the ‘recipient’ is merely getting unwanted sex?

Unwanted sex is when you have a choice for example sleep or sex and you choose sleep.

Sex when you do not have a choice to participate is rape.

Heard it all now. Angry

Pulpfiction1 · 06/01/2020 14:00

I knew that when men get older and their testosterone levels drop it can effect mental health.

But I was unsure of whether increasing testosterone on a physically healthly women could have a positive effect on mental health. Especially seeing as it can cause mood swings and aggression.

I'm really interested to know if women can be treated for mental health problems with testosterone or whether op is a guinipig of sorts.

breakfastpizza · 06/01/2020 14:01
  • Misogynistic dismissal of safety concerns for women and girls.
  • Science denier.
  • 'Feelings' over facts.
  • Erasure of gay and lesbian definitions.

Guess you're not so different from your parents after all, huh?

GinUnicorn · 06/01/2020 14:08

I think the issue is in order to make one small group comfortable women are being asked to essentially budge up and sacrifice our comfort and in some cases safety.

Why campaign for people with penis’s to take away our comfort and safety? Surely a better solution would be campaign for the additional feature of unisex so men and women biological or not could choose those facilities if they wanted to. Our choice is being removed at the moment and that doesn’t seem right.

Sideris · 06/01/2020 15:03

Page 8

People with a cervix is usually preferred

Preferred by whom?

People with cervixes who aren't women, some women without cervixes.

I think you're confused, I'm a man trying very hard to stay away from women's spaces

Ok. How about “do you agree there are obvious dangers in allowing penis owners access to women’s spaces?

The danger is not the person having a penis. The danger is a possible predator. To insist the penis is the problem, not the behaviour, is insisting the danger is innate in the body and unchangeable. Safety should always be key but safety should be raised and encouraged to begin with.

^I felt I was a boy
I'm greatly mentally more comfortable now that I'm seen as a man
Feelings have no gender^

Are you able to see the contradiction in what you have written?

The difference is innate feelings, which describe who you are, and cognitive feelings. I assumed the latter was hinted at, which I might've needed to ask on about.

Why are your feelings about not wanting to be referred to as a woman more important than my feelings about not wanting to be referred to as a person with a cervix?

If you have a cervix and you need treatment for it, it may be wise to address the cervix as such. Then you are a woman with a cervix. I'm not insisting you need to refer to yourself as a person with a cervix, I'm not insisting others need to refer to women with cervixes as 'people with cervixes', it's that the health care for people with cervixes who aren't women would drastically increase if hospitals and specialists stopped refusing treatment (which blocks even the most willing person) or automatically insisted on treating patients as women (which blocks people who are already hampered by the invasiveness of the treatment).

Would you want to be in a men's prison?

I would prefer it over women's prison.

I genuinely can’t believe that governments all over the western world are changing fundamental laws left right and centre over this bullshit. I’ve never seen someone who is trans been able to explain what they feel that makes them the opposite gender but here we are.

I genuinely can't believe that governments hadn't changed it sooner given that it is a tremendous health concern. Trans people being granted direly needed health care literally saves our lives.

I had a simple question (which involved severe pain in the surgery site) after my hysterectomy and had to wait three days before I could finally receive an answer from the surgeon who operated on me because the main department refused to answer someone listed as male in their system, and redirected me to the gender specialist, the hospital I was operated in refused to answer me because it was a surgeon from a different hospital, my GP wouldn't help because it involved specialist care and my specialist practice redirected me to the gynecologist department as they do not have one on practice and can't legally, or in-depth for that matter, offer advice.

Call me entirely selfish but I do not believe that it's right that I was stopped, and many of us are stopped, from asking a routine post-surgical question simply because I am trans.

I have a cervix and I do not prefer being referred to as a person with a cervix. I am a woman. If my cervix was removed would I then just be referred to as person?

I'm the last guy to insist that a cervix is what makes someone a woman, so I don't understand the need for this question. Without your cervix, you are a woman, or a woman without a cervix if medical need calls for the specification.

What was the part of being seen by others as female that made you suffer so? What was the discomfort that made you feel that it was wrong for you to be seen as a female person?

That it felt like an enormous lie perpetuated by everyone around me and that I was required to uphold to avoid ridicule or violence.

I am afraid I do not understand why gender expectations are not related to being trans, though. The term is transgender - so you transition from one gender to another. What is gender then? It is not biological sex, it is societal and cultural expectations of how each biological sex should be (I just checked a dictionary to be sure). So transgender is from one set of social and cultural expectations to another; otherwise it would still be transsexual, as it used to be? I have just checked and google tells me it is from one gender identity or expression to another. So gender expression - how is that understood if not as societal expectations of gender otherwise it would just be how one is, no need to transition.

Gender is a sense of self. If gender was exclusively societal and cultural expectations of how one should be, any gender nonconforming person would immediately be trans, or, in the case of gender nonconforming trans people, would immediately no longer be trans. Gender conformity (meeting the expectations óf a gender) and gender itself are two different things.

Transitioning is not a need to be trans. I was still trans before I transitioned, I know plenty of trans people who are still trans who don't want to transition, some who feel forced to socially try to adjust themselves in order to receive some respect for their identity. I did have the need to physically transition myself, however.

A letter every 3 years is classed as 'harassment' hmm

Perhaps I should clarify that I'm originally Dutch and never in my life received a letter for a cervical screening, despite having had one until a few months back, because first I was too young and then I was off the automatic mailing list.

As Mummyoflittledragon asked, what's your view on non trans people, just natal men, accessing previously women only spaces, abusing the sort of things you have fought for with your activism?

As you say, many trans people have used facilities by their chosen gender for many years, through the torelance and kindness of those who the sexed space is actually for. Now anyone can access these spaces: a man can come in the changing room in an open space next to me, not a trans woman to be clear, a bloke who is always a bloke, other than when claiming to be female to perve. Can you see how this causes a danger to women?

Obviously I do not support men abusing these rules, the same way I don't support men pretending to be janitors, men pretending to need to work on electricity, men pretending to need to open a locker, men otherwise lying to be granted access, men becoming PE teachers, men becoming prison wards in women's prisons to abuse or rape women. Anyone could already access these spaces. Women's spaces didn't have an unbreachable force field before hand and to insist no woman was ever abused or raped by a man in a woman's space beforehand would be lying. It's not like a rapist cares what the law says. Banning a specific set of women doesn't increase safety.

*Why do you get to change laws to impose the ideology that gender is an innate reality when so so so many people are saying that this is not their experience and when that ideology so clearly harms women.
How can feminisms work if all a woman has to do is simply identify out of their oppression?

Do you think that's true? That a trans man no longer experiences sexism and a trans woman no longer has male privilege simply by identifying themselves as the opposite sex?*

There is nothing 'simple' about any of this. It's impossible for anyone to identify out of oppression. Anyone who insists 'trans men are simply trying to identify out of oppression' is either gullible or intentionally acting out of bad faith. We're fully aware of reality. We may receive less harassment on a day to day basis if we're perceived as natal men, it's exchanged for the next obstacle to deal with. It's not a better deal.

I do struggle to understand slightly though. If you accept that biological sex cannot literally change, and you also indicate that you believe traditional gender roles are irrelevant to gender and are happy doing some traditional feminine things and describe yourself as sometimes being feminine, why bother?

Why not just be the individual person you are, and embrace the fact that your biological sex and your personality and personal identity aren’t tied together, therefore you can and should be whoever you like?

Being a feminine man doesn't make me a woman, doesn't mean I shouldn't continue a path that proves to be better for me. I'm already an individual person and that includes the medical path I've taken. I've tried accepting myself as a woman for decades and it did not work, not with therapy, not with guidance, not with help books, not with the help of friends, not with anything.

1) You mentioned about changing rooms at work. What would you say to a man who felt uncomfortable with trans men in the space?

That's his problem, not mine. I'm not anywhere to ease his comfort and I'm not going to work on his comfort.

2) what do you think about people who request a specific sex of medical professional for certain things?

Personally I think it's ridiculous. It's the care they provide that's important. Next'll be demands for medical professionals of specific sexualities because otherwise it's 'gross'.

3) what would you think of (for example) a pharmacy who wouldn't give out contraceptives because of their religious views?

I don't think they should be allowed to. If your religion bans you from doing your work properly, you shouldn't pursue it or ensure someone's available who can offer contraceptives.

As you are against gender stereotypes OP, can you explain what you mean by being seen “as a man” or living “as a man”? If stereotypes are bullshit then how is there any real way to be seen or live “as a man” that is different from “as a woman”?

I am against gender stereotypes. I'm also aware we use them for how we see others. I'm in some ways forced to adhere to them on a daily basis to be respected, but I'd prefer a society where a woman can walk freely with a beard and a man can walk around with a full chest and still be respected based on personal identification. That is a future I don't see happening soon, unfortunately. Nor does my desire for that change that I had significant dysphoria about my chest (would've been easier than wearing a binder, though, but I'd still have gotten my double mastectomy).

OP posts:
Drizzzle · 06/01/2020 15:21

Sideris I would assume that the hospital wouldn't speak to you (when you had a question after your surgery) because on their system you were registered as being a man, and men can't have hysterectomies so they might have thought that there was something wrong with their records (?)

Soontobe60 · 06/01/2020 15:21

OP, having read the last two posts you made before bedtime, I can see things from your POV more clearly. I found your answers to be more clear than your previous ones, which seemed to skirt round the questions being asked.
It's great that you've found a way to address your past mental health issues, it's just so sad that society has fixed expectations on what determines gender, which can make women feel subjugated and disempowered, whilst making men feel unable to be gentle, emotional, nurturing.
I'd like to think that the vast majority of people are happy to let others live their lives in a way that makes them feel happy, as long as that way of life causes no harm to others. And I accept that people who have transitioned from one gender to another are no more likely to cause harm than those who have not transitioned. My only real concern is that now a man can 'pretend' to be a woman in order to access women only spaces in order to harm women. Safeguarding seems to be being ignored. As a woman, being made to feel that this possibility can't be challenged as it would be seen as being transphobic is not right.
How do we get past this?

furrytoebean · 06/01/2020 15:22

I had a simple question (which involved severe pain in the surgery site) after my hysterectomy and had to wait three days before I could finally receive an answer from the surgeon who operated on me because the main department refused to answer someone listed as male in their system,

Surely this is why we shouldn't change people's sex on medical systems then and have a separate box that says trans man.
Rather than saying males can have cervix's why can't we say females have cervix and trans men are a subset of female.

By muddying the definition of male and female it makes it impossible to create safeguarding or efficient systems for either.

Sideris · 06/01/2020 15:28

Page 9

Sideris after your last post I actually feel quite sorry for you - and I’m being genuine. It’s full of contractions in with that post and posts you posted earlier. I think your still a very confused person and I hope you find peace.

I'm not confused in the slightest.

Very young children do not have their hormones changed
I wish this was true.

They do not. If someone told you that, they are willfully lying.

People with a cervix is usually preferred
If misgendering is a hate crime, why can't calling women "people with cervixes" also be? I would be VERY offended if someone called me that.

People with cervixes includes women, people with cervixes doesn't mean women.

What do you think of trans people and trans allies using intersex conditions to further their own agenda? Intersex people have repeatedly asked that their conditions are not conflated with transgenderism, yet it keeps happening. Do you have any comment on this?

Intersex people are not a hivemind, intersex people include trans people as well as gender critical people, intersex people's oppression and transphobic oppression have a significant overlap that surfaces time and time again. Intersex conditions are not 'being used'. The inclusion of intersex people is detrimental when you want to make laws about how much testosterone an athlete in women's sport is allowed to have, as the attempts to ban trans women often result in more intersex women being banned than trans women themselves.

When you campaign to forcibly remove the word by which half the population describe themselves - women - that is erasing our identity.

No one is trying to erase the word women. No one is saying you shouldn't be allowed to call yourself women. We're saying the distinction is important when not all women were assigned female at birth.

What is the vast majority of women would prefer to be called 'women' rather than people with cervixes?

We are not trying to have you call yourself 'people with cervixes'. 'People with cervixes' is important in medical sense because it does not automatically exclude people who aren't women who have cervixes.

What are your thoughts on people who identify as one of the now unlimited options outside of male or female? How did you know you were a male and not gender neutral etc?

Nonbinary people are great and I should try harder to include them in my daily vocabulary. I identified from nonbinary to male because I realized it fit me better, after removing prejudice regarding my own body that I never felt towards others (my lacking desire for bottom surgery while I never considered men without a penis or without plans for one any less male).

Do you think that some trans have become too militant and instead of supporting women have almost gone against them? IMO there just seems to be a lot of hate out there against women and is increasing.
I’m also v against gender neutral toilets as this makes women highly vulnerable.

No, I don't. I think some trans people are significantly hurt and feel threatened by the continuous attempts to shove us back into a closet and out of broad daylight as if we're people who shouldn't exist. Any hate isn't and never has been aimed at women, it's the unfair, inhumane treatment we receive.

It is fantastic that you’re supported but do you also understand that many don’t really give someone changing gender a great deal of importance? Whilst one respects personal choice obviously

If it was less of a great deal of importance, I could just get on with my life and we could carry on living our lives with dignity and respect. Unfortunately, those are both constantly hampered.

That’s interesting, OP. Many of us here reject the construct of gender, but accept that sex is just a biological fact of being a species that uses meiosis to reproduce.

Male and female aren't biological facts. Biological facts are the presence of a uterus, the presence of testicles, the function of a kidney, the surface of a brain. We assigned male and female to them and assigned that they should be, insisted stereotypes for them, created oppression for one and dominance for the other, perform surgery on new borns to make them fit the physical stereotypes if they don't fit.

OP posts:
YouJustDoYou · 06/01/2020 15:28

That's his problem, not mine. I'm not anywhere to ease his comfort and I'm not going to work on his comfort

So by that logic you are perfectly fine with someone saying the same about trans people ("it's their problem not mine. I don't want them in my safe space. I'm not anywhere to ease a transperson's comfort and I'm not going to work on their comfort").

Because to say otherwise would, obviously, make you a MASSIVE hypocrite.

YouJustDoYou · 06/01/2020 15:30

Male and female aren't biological facts

NHS says otherwise.

furrytoebean · 06/01/2020 15:31

I'm just waiting for the first woman to lose a case against an employee because 'men can get pregnant too' so how can a woman be discriminated against.

Just protecting 'people who can get pregnant' wouldn't work because women are looked over for promotions not because they can or will give birth but because they are in the sex category who can so might.
I was once told to take my wedding ring off before an interview by someone in recruitment told me this company is less likely to hire married women in their 30's in case they get pregnant. (Obviously this is illegal but very difficult to prove).
I have no plans on getting pregnant and yet it still affects me.

Changing the language matters because it affects who is protected by what law.

SophoclesTheFox · 06/01/2020 15:33

Male and female aren't biological facts

NHS says otherwise

the continued existence of the human race says otherwise!

HerRoyalFattyness · 06/01/2020 15:33

Surely this is why we shouldn't change people's sex on medical systems then and have a separate box that says trans man.
Rather than saying males can have cervix's why can't we say females have cervix and trans men are a subset of female.

I agree with this.
Of course it is awful that you didn't receive the answer to your question and the care you needed in a timely manner @Sideris, but at the same time if you had been listed as a transman on your records instead of just a man, it would have made it easier for the people to answer your question, as seeing man would have confused them, as men can't have hysterectomies.

Your last post is a little clearer than others, but you still seem very confused.

If trans is a feeling, then what if someone feels a greater affinity to black culture to white? Can they be transracial?
I am overweight. I hate being overweight and the looks of disgust I get from society. Does that mean I can feel slender? And be transslender?

And you have already said that feelings don't trump rights, so why do your feelings trump the rights of other men? If they aren't comfortable with you being in the changing room with them, they have rights which should protect them. And the same for women. We should not have to share a changing room with someone with a penis.

Sex segregation is there for a reason.
No one is saying that trans people are going to suddenly start attacking us.
What we are saying is that allowing self ID is making it easier for predators to attack.

And yes, they will always look for a way around it, but why make it easy for them?

furrytoebean · 06/01/2020 15:36

Sorry for the garbling in my las message I was doing two things at once. I obviously meant against and employer and my formatting was all weird.

tellmewhenthespaceshiplandscoz · 06/01/2020 15:38

If male and female aren't biological facts I'm struggling to think of anything that is, frankly.

I know, let's just make it all up as we go along shall we? Confused

HerRoyalFattyness · 06/01/2020 15:40

Male and female aren't biological facts

If this is the case can we have trans animals?

How do you explain the basic differences between make and female if it isn't sex? What is it that makes us different?