I didn't tell you what you were thinking @SeaEagleFeather. I used the term "implication" specifically.
By suggesting my thinking was fixed you implied I needed to be more open minded. You were critical about the fact I was 'grinding my axe' again a reasonable inference from this is that you did not agree with the points I was making.
The tone of your post suggested you did not agree with me and that I was being inflexible in not looking at another point of view.
My opinions are "entrenched" and can't be moved - that sounds like criticism. You claim I'm "not interested in any other comments".
I don't claim to know what you are thinking but looking at what you have posted I have drawn these conclusions. That's kind of how MN works.
Considering the subject matter is the KSA which indulges in public crucifixions and regularly beheads children you are entirely correct my opinions are very "entrenched".
The corollary to that is that your opinions are not entrenched (unlike mine) and you think we should consider what the KSA has to offer as a viable option.
In terms of what is and is not disturbing you find my comments disturbing I find public executions disturbing. I know which one most people would be more bothered about.