Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

30 days only

Lindsay Clancy case: was it evil, or severe mental illness?

935 replies

KellyK2026 · 04/09/2026 16:50

Lindsay Clancy, what do we all think? Pure evil or mentally ill?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
mulberrymilk · Yesterday 15:50

Aluna · Yesterday 15:41

Brief summary of some of her medication and reactions:

Zoloft, sertraline is an SSRI which can trigger manic episodes, was the first. She didn’t sleep for 48 hours on it experienced racing thoughts and increased anxiety. Nonetheless the dose was increased from 25mg to 50mg.

She was then given a cocktail of medications for insomnia and heart palpitations.

She was later given Prozac - another SSRI ie in the same class ie one that can trigger mania in bipolar. Given her poor reaction to Zoloft this was a strange choice.

LC then reported intensifying insomnia which should have been a red flag for drug intolerance or bipolar

She was given more sleep and anti anxiety medication.

She then experienced disassociation perceiving the world around her as “unstable”, “distorted” and “distant”. She reported feeling “disconnected” from her own body, unable to drive unable to be left alone.

This should’ve flagged a reassessment of the whole diagnosis and drug treatment.

At this point, she sees, not a psychiatrist, but another nurse practitioner who gave her Seroquel a bipolar med.

Her condition then took a dramatic turn for the worse – she experienced suicidal ideation, began experiencing what she described as “intrusive thoughts “ the voices said “I will not be the same I want to die”

She described herself to her husband and parents as feeling “emotionless “and “like a zombie”.

She lost 15 lbs, had no appetite and experienced panic attacks and confusion and experience a lack of attention over the days.

She was so scared by this she called the suicide hotline but they failed to hospitalise her as she didn’t have a particular suicide plan.

Rang another hotline but again they didn’t because she didn’t have a plan.

Her husband then followed up with her nurse practitioner. He said LC was now “10,000 times worse since she started this medication“. He asked if they could get LC off the medication and start from scratch.

But instead of stopping the medication, the nurse increased the dose.

PC then contacted the nurse again to say LC had had her worst week yet - he said she had had loud repeated auditory hallucinations all day, couldn’t get out of bed.

She later reported to PC snd her mother that she had thoughts of killing herself and harming the kids. She had delusions that people could hear her thoughts, that she would be locked up and have her children taken away.

She was then hospitalised and the Seroquel was stopped.

But she was then given another AD Amitriptyline and the dose increased the day before the killings.

On the day itself she reported waking up with suicidal thoughts, had suicidal hallucinations all day which later in the day begins to focus on harming the children.

I am aware that SSRIs are contraindicated for bipolar without a concurrent mood stabiliser. Or that is what I know from the past, perhaps thinking has changed.

But as she was prescribed Zoloft in September 2022, and took it for one week and then discontinued it, I very much doubt it would cause a problem 4 months down the line.

She was prescribed a very low dose of Prozac in November and had apparently taken it prior with a good response. It seems she didn't continue to take it.

In December she was re-prescribed Prozac along with a mood stabiliser (Lamactil), which is precisely what is recommended to avert any triggering of a tendency to bipolar. But again, I am not up on current thinking around this.

None of the drugs she was using after this would be likely to trigger bipolar or be contraindicated for bipolar, from what I can see.

EasternStandard · Yesterday 15:52

Aluna · Yesterday 15:48

How did you expect women to react?

I don’t personally indulge misogynist telescopic philanthropy which focuses in the children to the exclusion of LC. She experienced the most appalling suffering. And did basically die of her injuries, it’s just that the hospital managed to revive her.

This case is being heard to determine whether she ends up in prison or psychiatric hospital. And clearly I favour the latter. She has a full life sentence anyway.

What a bizarre way to say the dc who experienced fear and pain shouldn’t be considered.

Nomura · Yesterday 16:00

And did basically die of her injuries, it’s just that the hospital managed to revive her.

I'm surprised there isn't a queue at this hospital where the dead are being raised to life! Seriously, exaggeration does not help or strengthen your point, keep to the facts.

OpenScroller · Yesterday 16:02

At the end of the day, there's no actual proof she was in psychosis at the time of planning and carrying out the murders of her children.

We can't see into people's minds. Everyone who saw her leading up to the murders said they had no concerns about irrationality or other behaviours which are commonly seen in the presentation of psychosis.

Usually mothers with delusions like this have a specific belief - that they needed to protect their children by killing them, or they were 'demons' etc.

She hasn't come up with any of that. Just that a man's voice told her to do it, NOT that it was 'God' commanding her etc. A random man.

She does not present as someone who feels like her life is over because she murdered her children. She has been planning what she wants to do in future.

She's just a psychopath who got bored, frustrated and resentful after having her 3rd kid (assumably by choice) and didn't want to deal with them anymore, couldn't leave because she was a narcissistic control freak who wouldn't let anyone else raise them and they'd be miserable without her, so she decided to kill them and injure herself to get sympathy.

I don't think she intended her injuries to be as serious as they were. She was apparently sitting on the window ledge with her legs in front of her to reduce her fall. Probably inadvertently turned as she pushed herself off and landed on her back. You can't rehearse throwing yourself out of a window, can you?

KellyK2026 · Yesterday 16:03

Nomura · Yesterday 16:00

And did basically die of her injuries, it’s just that the hospital managed to revive her.

I'm surprised there isn't a queue at this hospital where the dead are being raised to life! Seriously, exaggeration does not help or strengthen your point, keep to the facts.

Not that I’d put it like that, but LC did go into cardiac arrest and the doctors managed to resuscitate her.

OP posts:
Aluna · Yesterday 16:04

mulberrymilk · Yesterday 15:50

I am aware that SSRIs are contraindicated for bipolar without a concurrent mood stabiliser. Or that is what I know from the past, perhaps thinking has changed.

But as she was prescribed Zoloft in September 2022, and took it for one week and then discontinued it, I very much doubt it would cause a problem 4 months down the line.

She was prescribed a very low dose of Prozac in November and had apparently taken it prior with a good response. It seems she didn't continue to take it.

In December she was re-prescribed Prozac along with a mood stabiliser (Lamactil), which is precisely what is recommended to avert any triggering of a tendency to bipolar. But again, I am not up on current thinking around this.

None of the drugs she was using after this would be likely to trigger bipolar or be contraindicated for bipolar, from what I can see.

She was given Zoloft and despite her bad reaction the dose was doubled.

When she was later given Prozac, another SSRI, she did not report a good reaction to it, no. She reported intensifying insomnia and anxiety.

Why she was re-prescribed it with that history idk.

After that she was given Seroquel (bipolar med) by a nurse practitioner which caused a significant turn for the worse which ended up in hospitalisation and the med was stopped.

It’s not that SSRIs may “trigger bipolar” from scratch but that they may trigger mania/hypomania in someone with an underlying tendency to bipolar. Just as they may trigger depressive symptoms in susceptible individuals.

Aluna · Yesterday 16:05

KellyK2026 · Yesterday 16:03

Not that I’d put it like that, but LC did go into cardiac arrest and the doctors managed to resuscitate her.

That’s right. She went into cardiac arrest, she had requested a DNR but the doctors had overruled that on the basis of lack of capacity. And they managed to revive her.

KellyK2026 · Yesterday 16:05

OpenScroller · Yesterday 16:02

At the end of the day, there's no actual proof she was in psychosis at the time of planning and carrying out the murders of her children.

We can't see into people's minds. Everyone who saw her leading up to the murders said they had no concerns about irrationality or other behaviours which are commonly seen in the presentation of psychosis.

Usually mothers with delusions like this have a specific belief - that they needed to protect their children by killing them, or they were 'demons' etc.

She hasn't come up with any of that. Just that a man's voice told her to do it, NOT that it was 'God' commanding her etc. A random man.

She does not present as someone who feels like her life is over because she murdered her children. She has been planning what she wants to do in future.

She's just a psychopath who got bored, frustrated and resentful after having her 3rd kid (assumably by choice) and didn't want to deal with them anymore, couldn't leave because she was a narcissistic control freak who wouldn't let anyone else raise them and they'd be miserable without her, so she decided to kill them and injure herself to get sympathy.

I don't think she intended her injuries to be as serious as they were. She was apparently sitting on the window ledge with her legs in front of her to reduce her fall. Probably inadvertently turned as she pushed herself off and landed on her back. You can't rehearse throwing yourself out of a window, can you?

That’s pure speculation. She needed a breathing tube. She went into cardiac arrest. She asked for a DNR prior to going into cardiac arrest and the doctors refused to grant her one. If they had, she’d be dead. I do believe she fully intended to kill herself and the medical reports show that her spine literally exploded in places.

OP posts:
KellyK2026 · Yesterday 16:08

Aluna · Yesterday 16:04

She was given Zoloft and despite her bad reaction the dose was doubled.

When she was later given Prozac, another SSRI, she did not report a good reaction to it, no. She reported intensifying insomnia and anxiety.

Why she was re-prescribed it with that history idk.

After that she was given Seroquel (bipolar med) by a nurse practitioner which caused a significant turn for the worse which ended up in hospitalisation and the med was stopped.

It’s not that SSRIs may “trigger bipolar” from scratch but that they may trigger mania/hypomania in someone with an underlying tendency to bipolar. Just as they may trigger depressive symptoms in susceptible individuals.

Edited

Honestly I wouldn’t bother trying to put any evidence to mulberry as they aren’t interested in listening to the facts. Any one of us that watched the trial knows that LC had a bad reaction to the meds and, when she voiced this, the doctors put her dose up rather than down. It’s shocking malpractice and they’ve not denied doing it.

OP posts:
BruachAbhann · Yesterday 16:09

Aluna · Yesterday 15:48

How did you expect women to react?

I don’t personally indulge misogynist telescopic philanthropy which focuses in the children to the exclusion of LC. She experienced the most appalling suffering. And did basically die of her injuries, it’s just that the hospital managed to revive her.

This case is being heard to determine whether she ends up in prison or psychiatric hospital. And clearly I favour the latter. She has a full life sentence anyway.

Do you live in America? If not, you are indulging in 'misogynist telescopic philanthropy'.

I don't expect women to bring their babies along to marches and hold them up and say 'same Lindsay' as if to say there but for the grace of god go I. I don't expect women to say that men are not 'allowed' have an opinion on this case because they can't suffer from PPP. I also don't expect women to shut down the debate on the case and say that only someone who has watched the entire trial is allowed to talk about it, which I've seen a lot, on this thread too. I don't expect women to have copycat killings.

'This case is being heard to determine whether she ends up in prison or psychiatric hospital. And clearly I favour the latter. She has a full life sentence anyway'.

And what if she's allowed out after a 6 month review? Would you be ok with that?

KellyK2026 · Yesterday 16:12

BruachAbhann · Yesterday 16:09

Do you live in America? If not, you are indulging in 'misogynist telescopic philanthropy'.

I don't expect women to bring their babies along to marches and hold them up and say 'same Lindsay' as if to say there but for the grace of god go I. I don't expect women to say that men are not 'allowed' have an opinion on this case because they can't suffer from PPP. I also don't expect women to shut down the debate on the case and say that only someone who has watched the entire trial is allowed to talk about it, which I've seen a lot, on this thread too. I don't expect women to have copycat killings.

'This case is being heard to determine whether she ends up in prison or psychiatric hospital. And clearly I favour the latter. She has a full life sentence anyway'.

And what if she's allowed out after a 6 month review? Would you be ok with that?

Nobody has said that you can’t participate on this Thread if you haven’t watched the full trial. But if you’re going to write barefaced lies, like ‘LC wrote in her diary that she hated her son’ be prepared to be called out for it by people who have done their research. Unfortunately rather than admitting they were wrong, some commenters have doubled down.

OP posts:
EasternStandard · Yesterday 16:12

KellyK2026 · Yesterday 16:08

Honestly I wouldn’t bother trying to put any evidence to mulberry as they aren’t interested in listening to the facts. Any one of us that watched the trial knows that LC had a bad reaction to the meds and, when she voiced this, the doctors put her dose up rather than down. It’s shocking malpractice and they’ve not denied doing it.

@mulberrymilkcan post, it doesn’t need to be don’t bother etc. It’s not one view about all this.

KellyK2026 · Yesterday 16:21

EasternStandard · Yesterday 16:12

@mulberrymilkcan post, it doesn’t need to be don’t bother etc. It’s not one view about all this.

It’s not the view that’s the problem, it’s the posting things that aren’t true and not listening to counterarguments when they are backed up with evidence and instead saying ‘it’s just semantics’. No, it’s evidence that has been used in a court of law. It isn’t up for debate whether the meds negatively impacted on LC, it’s in her medical records what she reported and what the doctors did in response to it. e.g. LC told doctors that certain medications were making her worse (she also documented the affects of each medication in her journal) and, instead of listening to her, they increased the dosage. That’s been proven.

OP posts:
EasternStandard · Yesterday 16:25

KellyK2026 · Yesterday 16:21

It’s not the view that’s the problem, it’s the posting things that aren’t true and not listening to counterarguments when they are backed up with evidence and instead saying ‘it’s just semantics’. No, it’s evidence that has been used in a court of law. It isn’t up for debate whether the meds negatively impacted on LC, it’s in her medical records what she reported and what the doctors did in response to it. e.g. LC told doctors that certain medications were making her worse (she also documented the affects of each medication in her journal) and, instead of listening to her, they increased the dosage. That’s been proven.

Edited

It’s ok to correct imo, there’s loads of detail to the case. Generally it’s been a pretty interesting thread.

OpenScroller · Yesterday 16:29

KellyK2026 · Yesterday 16:05

That’s pure speculation. She needed a breathing tube. She went into cardiac arrest. She asked for a DNR prior to going into cardiac arrest and the doctors refused to grant her one. If they had, she’d be dead. I do believe she fully intended to kill herself and the medical reports show that her spine literally exploded in places.

Edited

If she 'fully intended to kill herself', why not sever her carotid artery when cutting her neck, as has been pointed out on this thread, she would have been well aware where it was?

Why discard the the children, who she loved so much, on the floor after she murdered them in the basement and go up a 1st floor bedroom, lock the door and make non life threatening injuries? Why not stay with her children in the basement if she really was delusional enough to believe she was 'protecting them' by killing them?

KellyK2026 · Yesterday 16:31

EasternStandard · Yesterday 16:25

It’s ok to correct imo, there’s loads of detail to the case. Generally it’s been a pretty interesting thread.

It has and most commenters have been pretty respectful, even if we’ve disagreed. However, in Mulberry’s case, I corrected them when they said that LC wrote that she hated her son and, instead of accepting that, they more or less wrote that I was obviously fine with the killing of children. That’s not someone who you can have a conversation with.

OP posts:
OpenScroller · Yesterday 16:31

She also must have been pretty lucid to ask for a DNR as you said. Also probably lucid enough to know, as a nurse, that they would not grant one.

KellyK2026 · Yesterday 16:37

OpenScroller · Yesterday 16:29

If she 'fully intended to kill herself', why not sever her carotid artery when cutting her neck, as has been pointed out on this thread, she would have been well aware where it was?

Why discard the the children, who she loved so much, on the floor after she murdered them in the basement and go up a 1st floor bedroom, lock the door and make non life threatening injuries? Why not stay with her children in the basement if she really was delusional enough to believe she was 'protecting them' by killing them?

You’re asking me questions as though I’m her. I can’t answer for her. I don’t know why she did what she did as none of it was rational. I do know that however she fell out of the window it resulted in serious injuries which she would’ve died from without immediate medical intervention. She wanted to sign a DNR immediately but was denied.

I think a lot of the things she did can’t be rationalised because I don’t believe she was rational. Her defence claims that she wasn’t rational at the time, which may explain why her actions don’t make sense to us.

OP posts:
CloverAndGrass · Yesterday 16:58

KellyK2026 · Yesterday 15:06

Doesn’t make it not true either. Either way I think her receiving death threats for it is a bit extreme, don’t you?

Watch the video. It’s clear as day what she was doing. Why don’t need to take anyone’s word for it. Yes, it’s totally wrong that anyone is sending her death threats. I hope she never works as a journalist or in any capacity to do with children again though.

MissMoneyFairy · Yesterday 16:58

What reason did she give for killing the children and making a suicide attempt? She was alert enough to request dnr despite her injuries and emergency meds.

Tuesdayschild50 · Yesterday 17:02

You must be mentally ill can't imagine anyone being of sound mind doing something so horrific like ending her own children's lives.
Where were the authorities when she was crying out for help .. they're to blame for all of this.

CloverAndGrass · Yesterday 17:06

StraightTalkingTina · Yesterday 15:23

You’ve been given the list of meds from her toxicology report.

Would you answer my question? What does evidence of psychosis look like for you?

And how can a totally sane cold blooded murderer also be actively suicidal at the same time?

she has no injuries from her bodies auto response to jumping out of a window. She didn’t put her arms out to protect herself. How is someone able to override those natural human instincts?

I think you may be mixing up @mulberrymilk and me. I will reply to you about evidence for psychosis question shortly.

And how can a totally sane cold blooded murderer also be actively suicidal at the same time?

This is a very, very strange question. Many murderers, including for example school mass shooters and family annihilators, are sane cold blooded murderers AND actively suicidal at the same time. It is a not uncommon pattern amongst murderers.

CloverAndGrass · Yesterday 17:30

StraightTalkingTina · Yesterday 14:39

Her clinical history. The contents of her diary. The conversations she had with her family. The witness statements confirming she was deteriorating quickly and begging for help. The evidenced lack of appropriate clinical care.

thats enough for reasonable doubt over whether she could have been having a psychotic episode with auditory hallucinations.

In addition to that,
the fact she was then diagnosed with Bi Polar. Knowing the impact of the medications she was given on someone who is BPD and not treated. And having direct experience of someone living in and out of psychotic episodes.

what evidence would you need to be presented that would ‘affirm’ for you that she was suffering psychosis at the time? What does that evidence look like?

Her clinical history and diary are evidence that she was mentally unwell, not that she was in psychosis. I don’t think anyone is disputing that she was mentally unwell. I’m certainly not. No-one who saw her clinically before the murders diagnosed her with psychosis or any psychotic symptoms. The conversations with her family again do not show psychosis. You can be unwell and deteriorating and asking for help without being psychotic and completely out of control of your own actions. The lack of appropriate care again is not evidence of psychosis.

What evidence would affirm for me that she was in psychosis? Evidence of behaviour other than murdering her children which it would be difficult to explain without psychosis. Evidence of this type of behaviour at any time before she murdered her children. Evidence that LC had reported psychotic symptoms to clinicians before she murdered her children.

StraightTalkingTina · Yesterday 18:08

CloverAndGrass · Yesterday 17:06

I think you may be mixing up @mulberrymilk and me. I will reply to you about evidence for psychosis question shortly.

And how can a totally sane cold blooded murderer also be actively suicidal at the same time?

This is a very, very strange question. Many murderers, including for example school mass shooters and family annihilators, are sane cold blooded murderers AND actively suicidal at the same time. It is a not uncommon pattern amongst murderers.

It’s not a strange question at all.

its about the clinical position of the individual to be legally sane in killing their children but also legally meeting the threshold of institutional detention due to being actively suicidal.

The two are not compatible.

other cases are irrelevant unless you want to debate the mental health of each perpetrator too. School shootings, awful example, yet largely where children and young people also have warning signals that were ignored or missed.

admittedly, often not as clearly as Lindsey did and yet she is being berated for that.

StraightTalkingTina · Yesterday 18:16

CloverAndGrass · Yesterday 17:30

Her clinical history and diary are evidence that she was mentally unwell, not that she was in psychosis. I don’t think anyone is disputing that she was mentally unwell. I’m certainly not. No-one who saw her clinically before the murders diagnosed her with psychosis or any psychotic symptoms. The conversations with her family again do not show psychosis. You can be unwell and deteriorating and asking for help without being psychotic and completely out of control of your own actions. The lack of appropriate care again is not evidence of psychosis.

What evidence would affirm for me that she was in psychosis? Evidence of behaviour other than murdering her children which it would be difficult to explain without psychosis. Evidence of this type of behaviour at any time before she murdered her children. Evidence that LC had reported psychotic symptoms to clinicians before she murdered her children.

Actually the issue is not whether she was psychotic, it’s whether she was too unwell to appreciate the criminality or wrongfulness of her conduct, OR to conform her conduct to the requirements of the law.

it is convenient that you exclude ‘killing your children’ on the list of acceptable behaviour or evidence of a mentally unwell woman achieving 1 or 2 above, when it is that action that precisely determines just how unwell she was. That and her own suicide attempt of course.

reminding that she did report thoughts of self harm and causing harm to the children, which everyone brushed off. They didn’t believe she was capable of anything so bad. Because they didn’t understand her condition.

Swipe left for the next trending thread