Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Mr markle child images?

1000 replies

Seriestwo · 23/10/2026 00:46

his son dobbed him in? Is it true?
x.com/gbpolitcs/status/2113385754353103129?s=46

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
EvieBB · 23/10/2026 21:24

TheCheekyCyanHelper · 23/10/2026 21:19

Bs. Its all rooted in Racism.

What is?

PumpkinPieAlibi · 23/10/2026 21:25

Lugol · 23/10/2026 20:41

I'd read it was Harry she didn't know of. And that the only thing she asked of her friend who was setting them up on a blind date was "Is he kind?"

Her childhood friend said she was obsessed with Diana.

Why are you bringing Catherine into anything?

Not sure what you read but I am quoting the actual transcript of their engagement interview. That is a verified fact, not conjecture.

So much of what is said about her is conjecture and rumour repeated until the truth is completely obfuscated and ofc, people choose to believe what they want.

I am bringing up Kate because I am trying to draw a parallel. Why is it said that Meghan was obsessed with Diana? Was it because of the poster in her room because if so, then logically, should we conclude the same about Kate and her purported William poster?
(P.S. I don't really believe either, I'm just showing how the same actions leads to different conclusions because of the narrative around each woman).

MyrtleLion · 23/10/2026 21:27

Scuttlingupabove · 23/10/2026 21:19

I've no idea. But it's just all really, really odd. She probably should have waited before sending that statement saying she knew in 2018 but didn't do anything, especially as it's not been corroborated. It's useful for her to say that she knew in 2018 so she can now explain why he didn't come to the wedding I suppose. Its all so unpleasant. And those kids...new school and your grandpa is outed (worldwide) as an alleged paedo.

You can't chose who you fall in love with but goodness me Harry really chose a tricky family to join.

Edited

She was told after her wedding. And she did do something. She cut him off, and protected her children. No wonder she never shows their faces.

Scuttlingupabove · 23/10/2026 21:33

MyrtleLion · 23/10/2026 21:27

She was told after her wedding. And she did do something. She cut him off, and protected her children. No wonder she never shows their faces.

But in Oprah she went in great detail about why she was estranged. Was that all lies? And Harry saying in 2022 in Netflix it was because of him that she lost her dad and if he wasnt married to her she would still have a Dad. Who was a paedo??

She cut her father off years before the wedding. But said he was going to walk her down the aisle? She didn't have kids to protect in 2018 so why did she say the only reason she cut him off was to protect her kids?

He may well be a paedo..who knows. But her statement has made everything very odd.

valeriy2 · 23/10/2026 21:34

The Sun is saying the haul includes a video of her father having sex with an underage Asian girl. I'm lost for words he is the worse of the worse.This is beyond grim.

PumpkinPieAlibi · 23/10/2026 21:37

TheCheekyCyanHelper · 23/10/2026 21:19

Bs. Its all rooted in Racism.

That is one factor. Xenophobia is another.

I don't doubt that most people are probably not racist and that the dislike for Meghan is rooted in other things, many of which are irrational, but racism is definitely a factor for some.

I will never forget reading a comment on the DM that said something like 'Silly Harry. You have fun with the help, not marry them'. And the sad thing was it had hundreds of upvotes.

So yes, it's naive to assume race isn't a factor, even if it's not the case for posters here.

PumpkinPieAlibi · 23/10/2026 21:39

valeriy2 · 23/10/2026 21:34

The Sun is saying the haul includes a video of her father having sex with an underage Asian girl. I'm lost for words he is the worse of the worse.This is beyond grim.

Edited

Omg. That is disgusting. He is the lowest of the low. 😱

And the gall he had to demand access to his grandchildren.

Fluffyholeysocks · 23/10/2026 21:39

From what I understand, her father was under investigation in 2018. Were any charges brought against him? Has he been found guilty? Is he still under investigation?

valeriy2 · 23/10/2026 21:40

He is undoubtedly a vile monster.

www.thesun.co.uk/news/40791245/meghan-dad-child-abuse-photo-police-stash-thomas-markle/

Scuttlingupabove · 23/10/2026 21:42

Fluffyholeysocks · 23/10/2026 21:39

From what I understand, her father was under investigation in 2018. Were any charges brought against him? Has he been found guilty? Is he still under investigation?

Who had him under investigation? Not the Met presumably as he's not a Uk citizen and wasn't in the country. So was it the FBI and they told the Met who told MM allegedly? That was 8 years ago. Has he been investigated for 8 years? How long does it take to impound someone's computer or raid their house? How has this investigation not leaked before?

Scuttlingupabove · 23/10/2026 21:44

PumpkinPieAlibi · 23/10/2026 21:37

That is one factor. Xenophobia is another.

I don't doubt that most people are probably not racist and that the dislike for Meghan is rooted in other things, many of which are irrational, but racism is definitely a factor for some.

I will never forget reading a comment on the DM that said something like 'Silly Harry. You have fun with the help, not marry them'. And the sad thing was it had hundreds of upvotes.

So yes, it's naive to assume race isn't a factor, even if it's not the case for posters here.

Wasn't it said by Prince Philip and it was about actresses, not the help.

Douglasmummy · 23/10/2026 21:45

valeriy2 · 23/10/2026 21:40

Eek that link said the pictures of him with a young Asian girl are from when he was in his late 40's or 50's so Meghan must have been a child. Didn't he have custody of her?

LipglossAndLies · 23/10/2026 21:45

CluelessAmerican · 23/10/2026 21:02

You keep throwing out "vile messages". You wrote the most vile comment ever on Mumsnet in another thread

No I didn't. I don't agree how two religious priests made a comment and used a woman to make a point when the same point could have been made genrrally about capitalism instead. But no they picked on a person instead and I was clesr in saying what they said and how they made their point is disgusting. What's vile about that? I didn't personally attack the priests. So pipe down and stop going round bringing this up and twisting it.

LipglossAndLies · 23/10/2026 21:48

PumpkinPieAlibi · 23/10/2026 21:39

Omg. That is disgusting. He is the lowest of the low. 😱

And the gall he had to demand access to his grandchildren.

And the gall of many posters here who said how awful she was for denying the kids a relstionship with their granddad. Imagine if she had what the comments would be like now. So she did the right thing in protecting her children yef she is an awful mother according to mnay on here.

Fluffyholeysocks · 23/10/2026 21:48

Scuttlingupabove · 23/10/2026 21:42

Who had him under investigation? Not the Met presumably as he's not a Uk citizen and wasn't in the country. So was it the FBI and they told the Met who told MM allegedly? That was 8 years ago. Has he been investigated for 8 years? How long does it take to impound someone's computer or raid their house? How has this investigation not leaked before?

It's all very odd - why now? Surely an investigation should have taken place in 2018 by the relevent authority ( which would not be the Met). If the evidence of wrong doing is evident and was evident in 2018, why did no one in authority act on it?

CluelessAmerican · 23/10/2026 21:50

LipglossAndLies · 23/10/2026 21:45

No I didn't. I don't agree how two religious priests made a comment and used a woman to make a point when the same point could have been made genrrally about capitalism instead. But no they picked on a person instead and I was clesr in saying what they said and how they made their point is disgusting. What's vile about that? I didn't personally attack the priests. So pipe down and stop going round bringing this up and twisting it.

That wasn't it and you know it. Would you like me to repost it?

valeriy2 · 23/10/2026 21:50

Douglasmummy · 23/10/2026 21:45

Eek that link said the pictures of him with a young Asian girl are from when he was in his late 40's or 50's so Meghan must have been a child. Didn't he have custody of her?

This is really beyond grim - I'm lost for words.

LipglossAndLies · 23/10/2026 21:54

Douglasmummy · 23/10/2026 21:45

Eek that link said the pictures of him with a young Asian girl are from when he was in his late 40's or 50's so Meghan must have been a child. Didn't he have custody of her?

Awful.

Benjithedog · 23/10/2026 21:54

LipglossAndLies · 23/10/2026 21:45

No I didn't. I don't agree how two religious priests made a comment and used a woman to make a point when the same point could have been made genrrally about capitalism instead. But no they picked on a person instead and I was clesr in saying what they said and how they made their point is disgusting. What's vile about that? I didn't personally attack the priests. So pipe down and stop going round bringing this up and twisting it.

Why are you bringing up the priests? They didn’t say anything disgusting at all. You can’t say the same for the supporters though. You also have NO right in telling other posts to pipe down.

Ickkkkkk · 23/10/2026 21:56

Douglasmummy · 23/10/2026 21:45

Eek that link said the pictures of him with a young Asian girl are from when he was in his late 40's or 50's so Meghan must have been a child. Didn't he have custody of her?

Those poor children. Poor Meghan.

Fluffyholeysocks · 23/10/2026 21:59

Ickkkkkk · 23/10/2026 21:56

Those poor children. Poor Meghan.

If it's true, I agree - those poor asian girls.

CluelessAmerican · 23/10/2026 22:03

Lipgloss, Do you remember this post you made:

"Every single day, people go to places like Chernobyl, Auschwitz, the 9/11 Memorial, or historic battlefields, take photos, tag their outfits ("fit checks"), and post them to Instagram or TikTok where they earn ad revenue or affiliate commissions. For a huge portion of the internet-native population, this is just normal digital behavior."

Scuttlingupabove · 23/10/2026 22:16

Fluffyholeysocks · 23/10/2026 21:48

It's all very odd - why now? Surely an investigation should have taken place in 2018 by the relevent authority ( which would not be the Met). If the evidence of wrong doing is evident and was evident in 2018, why did no one in authority act on it?

Edited

And why didnt MM if she knew all about it for 8 years do something? Are the photos and videos over 8 years old, or are there ones since 2018 when more children are abused?

She would have known he wasn't prosecuted so she must have assumed he was innocent? So why still be estranged from him? This really makes no sense.

I think her statement is taking advantage of the situation to excuse her estrangement. And that this is probably the first she's heard of it. That's the only thing that logically makes sense.

Constantrunner · 23/10/2026 22:17

Sober23 · 23/10/2026 01:02

Wonder if that's why she distanced herself from him.

Meghan gave a statement saying she has known for some time and that is why she has distanced herself and not allowed him to see her children

PumpkinPieAlibi · 23/10/2026 22:18

Scuttlingupabove · 23/10/2026 21:44

Wasn't it said by Prince Philip and it was about actresses, not the help.

Yes I think Phillip did say something (vile) like that which is why I assumed the commenter said what he did. And the comment definitely said 'the help'.

The implication was clear i.e. because Meghan was mixed race, she was only fit to be the help. It was disgusting and there are definitely people who think that way.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.