Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Mr markle child images?

1000 replies

Seriestwo · 23/10/2026 00:46

his son dobbed him in? Is it true?
x.com/gbpolitcs/status/2113385754353103129?s=46

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Noodledog · 23/10/2026 13:32

LifeIsTooShort247 · 23/10/2026 13:18

What should she have done? She was informed of allegations (not proof) and that the matter was being investigated. What more should she have done? Told everyone before there was proof? And if it turned out she was wrong then you would be here accusing her of lying again.

I don't know. I do know that I wouldn't have sat on my arse for 8 years knowing that in the intervening time potentially countless children were being abused by a suspected paedophile. And let's not forget, she was in a position of considerable power and influence at the time. She could have found ways to leak what was going on - instead she spent years talking bollocks about disowning her father because of tabloid photos.

Countless potential victims. Defend her if you want.

GoodGirlFaith · 23/10/2026 13:32

https://www.royal.uk/royal-family

The Royal Family website; The Duke & Duchess of Sussex.

'Except they don't want to be Royal other than when it suits them.'

@KnickerBockerGloriously

The Role of The Royal Family

https://www.royal.uk/royal-family

Madcats · 23/10/2026 13:32

After all the brouhaha following Harry’s interview with GQ(?) this week, stressing the importance of family reconciliations…

X (other social media sites available) was busy with commentators asking why Megan hadn’t reached out to her own family…. 72 hours later we get this!

If it is true, I hope they throw the book at Mr Markle. It seems a bit odd to have amassed boxes of child porn in the Philippines, having only been in the country since 2025 (and currently back in US since May 26 for medical treatment).

Odd

SiegfriedSassoon · 23/10/2026 13:32

lindyloo57 · 23/10/2026 13:24

I can't believe the hate for Megan, she kept quiet about her father, she must of be embarrassed, its all out in the open now, now all you haters realise why she didn't invite him to the wedding and why she didn't go see him when was poorly.

Anyone who protects or enables paedophiles deserves to be criticised. It's quite disturbing you think being embarrassed is an excuse for looking the other way. Shocking.

Noodledog · 23/10/2026 13:33

AlonsoMosley · 23/10/2026 13:21

What do you expect her to do?

Name him and shame him? That would go well...
Follow up with the police? maybe she did...
Hire private detectives to investigate?

What would you do in that situation?

Why not try those things? Any of them would be a far better option than doing nothing and staying silent.

PleasantGreenPorcupine · 23/10/2026 13:33

SiegfriedSassoon · 23/10/2026 13:32

Anyone who protects or enables paedophiles deserves to be criticised. It's quite disturbing you think being embarrassed is an excuse for looking the other way. Shocking.

👏🏼👏🏼

PleasantGreenPorcupine · 23/10/2026 13:35

toiletpaperthief · 23/10/2026 13:30

I find it utterly shocking that a MN thread that started as a womans father being investigated for child po-rn has turned into said woman being accused of child se-xual abuse. The conspiracionists are out full force today (must be the rain). The "Megan hatred" is getting ridiculous.

If you see hate, please report it, it breaks talk guidelines.
ps love the word conspiracionist!

Alondra · 23/10/2026 13:35

GucciBear · 23/10/2026 01:54

Meghan will love this. Perfect excuse to say that is why he was not at the wedding! She can play the victim again ....................................................

Some of you have serious problems dealing with a woman you don't know but keep hating on because media like Daily Mail and crap TV programs.

Meghan stopped having a relationship with her father years ago because he cashed in on her marriage to Harry. Same as with her sister and brothers. The only person she trusts is her mother because she never sold her to the media.

She is not a victim. She is not responsible for her father's actions.

Big difference.

Benjithedog · 23/10/2026 13:35

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

That’s actually a disgusting thing to say. It should ALWAYS be about the victims

AtIusvue · 23/10/2026 13:36

Noodledog · 23/10/2026 13:32

I don't know. I do know that I wouldn't have sat on my arse for 8 years knowing that in the intervening time potentially countless children were being abused by a suspected paedophile. And let's not forget, she was in a position of considerable power and influence at the time. She could have found ways to leak what was going on - instead she spent years talking bollocks about disowning her father because of tabloid photos.

Countless potential victims. Defend her if you want.

Correct.

She could have alluded to the CSA allegations in her Oprah interview. In the way she alluded to the racism allegations, without actual proof.

Instead, she very clearly stated she cut her father off because of collusion with the tabloids.

She easily could have found a way to get this info out. She not only chose not to, she chose instead to put out an ‘alternative narrative’ that it’s because of his involvement with the wedding media circus, which obscured what she now maintains, was the actual reason why she cut him off.

Noodledog · 23/10/2026 13:37

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Sewingbeedamned · 23/10/2026 13:37

OrangeFlower14 · 23/10/2026 01:06

Imagine finding that out about your dad… worse than the situation for Prince Andrew’s kids

But her sister also had her children taken away, didn’t she?

WTF is going on with those two. Feel really sorry for Meghan.

Yes, and yet threads are full of people throwing shade on her for being estranged.

Janiie · 23/10/2026 13:38

toiletpaperthief · 23/10/2026 13:30

I find it utterly shocking that a MN thread that started as a womans father being investigated for child po-rn has turned into said woman being accused of child se-xual abuse. The conspiracionists are out full force today (must be the rain). The "Megan hatred" is getting ridiculous.

It's child sex abuse, there's no such thing as child porn.

The problem is these allegations have come from the son who has said lots of crap in the past so let's wait for some proof before we get the pitchforks out?

LifeIsTooShort247 · 23/10/2026 13:38

Noodledog · 23/10/2026 13:32

I don't know. I do know that I wouldn't have sat on my arse for 8 years knowing that in the intervening time potentially countless children were being abused by a suspected paedophile. And let's not forget, she was in a position of considerable power and influence at the time. She could have found ways to leak what was going on - instead she spent years talking bollocks about disowning her father because of tabloid photos.

Countless potential victims. Defend her if you want.

So you don't know what she should of done but you write comments saying she sohuld of. Right okay then. Make it make sense please.

So you are privy to the outcome of those investigations that took place, has it not occured to that maybe they didn't find anything then.

Where were you when Andrew's news came about? I mean isn't that even worse that the RF put out a statement dsicrediting a victim calling her a liar. They have stayed silent all of them, Camilla works with cahrities for abused women, what has she done with all the power and influence she has being much higher up in the monarchy. She hasn't even been able to influence the RF to put a statement stating how wrong it was to discredit Virginia. Why didn't anyone in the Rf leak it out, we only knew when Epstein was arrested...

threetrainers · 23/10/2026 13:39

@Noodledogwhat should she have done? Presumably the authorities investigated him who informed her also knew of his travels?

threetrainers · 23/10/2026 13:40

SiegfriedSassoon · 23/10/2026 13:32

Anyone who protects or enables paedophiles deserves to be criticised. It's quite disturbing you think being embarrassed is an excuse for looking the other way. Shocking.

@SiegfriedSassoon how has she enabled a pedophile?

threetrainers · 23/10/2026 13:41

I’m actually shocked at the depths people are going to today, it’s embarrassing to MNs

Alondra · 23/10/2026 13:42

Janiie · 23/10/2026 13:38

It's child sex abuse, there's no such thing as child porn.

The problem is these allegations have come from the son who has said lots of crap in the past so let's wait for some proof before we get the pitchforks out?

What you've failed to acknowledge is this:

I find it utterly shocking that a MN thread that started as a womans father being investigated for child po-rn has turned into said woman being accused of child se-xual abuse.

Shame on you all.

LifeIsTooShort247 · 23/10/2026 13:42

SiegfriedSassoon · 23/10/2026 13:32

Anyone who protects or enables paedophiles deserves to be criticised. It's quite disturbing you think being embarrassed is an excuse for looking the other way. Shocking.

So are we now saying as a society if you are accused of something (without proof) it should be shouted from the rooftops, harm any investigations being conducted..because that is what it sounds like to me.

AlonsoMosley · 23/10/2026 13:45

Noodledog · 23/10/2026 13:33

Why not try those things? Any of them would be a far better option than doing nothing and staying silent.

Well, let's have a little think shall we?

So - just on your posting alone, a tiny grain of sand in the Drive Intense Dislike of MM club. Play it out - how many posts do you think you would have written about her had she gone public? What do you think you have written in those posts had she gone public with allegations? I have a good idea, looking at the scale of your writing today alone. What would you have written? Somehow, I do not think it would fall along a "look, she is trying to do the right thing" line.

How many times have you used her no contact with her father as proof that she is a nasty person? Now this comes out, and you perform a perfect pivot. Now, rather than "oh, it makes sense now" it becomes MM does not protect children from child abuse.
Grim.

threetrainers · 23/10/2026 13:45

Ickkkkkk · 23/10/2026 13:26

The police already knew. How could she make them take action?

I think she should have become a detective and perhaps a solicitor and judge and sentenced him herself.

Janiie · 23/10/2026 13:46

If the Sussexes weren't such blabbermouths I'd understand that they'd keep quiet about this but if she can say now there was a letter and allegations in 2018 then she should have said so earlier. No, the old 'she would have been advised not to' does not wash as they've never listened to a word of advice previously.

She wouldn't have sent a Dear Daddy letter in 2019 or hoped for his recovery post amputation if any 2018 allegations were proven.

This is just a convenient excuse to enable their behaviour. Let's not forget they were nc over his media photo shoot and media gossiping before the 2018 'letter' was even allegedly revealed.

Janiie · 23/10/2026 13:47

threetrainers · 23/10/2026 13:45

I think she should have become a detective and perhaps a solicitor and judge and sentenced him herself.

Like some posters on here perhaps?

Noodledog · 23/10/2026 13:48

This is. without a doubt, one of the most revolting threads I've been unfortunate enough to read on MN. You're right, would have been difficult for an adult married to a Prince to try to take action protect children from a potential paedophile. Who cares about the children, right? Won't someone think of the Princess!

LifeIsTooShort247 · 23/10/2026 13:48

threetrainers · 23/10/2026 13:45

I think she should have become a detective and perhaps a solicitor and judge and sentenced him herself.

She should of single handley dismantled the pedophile rings around the world, its only way she could protect all the children. Then just like in Minority Report she should of been able to read peoples minds and go stop them before they commit any child abuse offences. Even then it would not be enough for some people.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.