Please or to access all these features

The royal family

Mr markle child images?

1000 replies

Seriestwo · 23/10/2026 00:46

his son dobbed him in? Is it true?
x.com/gbpolitcs/status/2113385754353103129?s=46

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Onebigsham · 23/10/2026 12:07

LipglossAndLies · 23/10/2026 12:03

A person can have multiple reasons as to why, her reason she gave at the time is still valid. I wouldn't be making public that my Dad has been accused of something until it was investigated and proved. What would you do if it was your Dad? Go running to the press and everyone you know telling them, hey I think my Dad is xyz.

No. As I said clearly in my post, I would say nothing other than it was a private family matter. I certainly would not be making money out of it by talking about the estrangement in a Netflix documentary I had produced and was asking people to believe in for its veracity - certainly not if I was only giving half the truth.

MerryAquaKoala · 23/10/2026 12:08

Mossyfox · 23/10/2026 11:50

Six years for an investigation. That's a very long time.

Almost like, it wasn't happening at all, isn't it. If there was such a letter sent to the police in 2018 - they would have investigated it, if he was guilty it would have been known by everyone by now. But the fact is we have MM word that the police received a random letter (one of thousands if it existed at all), and now it's only known because her brother announce some accusations to the world, for which he was paid.

What we need is for the police to refute or not what she said. And if they did indeed receive such a letter, what happened next? Are they liable for doing nothing about alleged child abuse or is it made up, like the we got married before the wedding / the rf is racist crap.

I do not believe this MM bs for one minute. It's a convenient story for her to justify her actions (and for her brother to make money from his dad after his dad stopped funding his lifestyle).

They are desperate remember. Absolutely desperate.

Janiie · 23/10/2026 12:09

weegielass1 · 23/10/2026 12:04

I don't understand if it was known in 2018, why wasn't he questioned / arrested / investigated then? Why take 8 years?
Unless this gives a convienient excuse for MM to jump on as the reason for going NC with her family in 2018. Show us the letter Meghan!

Exactly.

It's all so typical of the crap that this family generate.

GoodGirlFaith · 23/10/2026 12:10

Interesting timing. I believe Samantha. I think Thomas Jnr. blackmailed his father with these allegations when his money stopped. I do not believe the allegations - yet (they could have easily been planted and no arrests have been made so far).

I think there has been a media blackout on the story but as Meghan and Harry are very clearly now in the process of repositioning themselves in the UK as 'working royals/HIHO' of some kind, the 'stars aligned' etc.. this story has been released; it gives Meghan a chance to explain the estrangement from her father. Her statement reflects well on her and may alters people's mindset to understanding, empathising and ultimatley hoping that the RF will take her (Harry and the kids) in again as their own.

Interesting that the Daily Mail have this as their headline story with the next article down William on the Graham Norton Show.

Said it again and will say (write) it again... there is some marvellous PR going on here with H&M. I personally still think it's Palace PR, much as most people keep on telling me how wrong I am on this... we shall see!

Janiie · 23/10/2026 12:13

PistachioTiramisu · 23/10/2026 11:57

How very convenient that this issue has come to light when she is trying to gain sympathy and interest in her exploits!

Yes and how very odd that these allegations and concerns haven't ever been revealed in their many reality shows and blabathons.

You'd think a 'people criticise us for being nc with Markle Senior but believe me there is a very serious reason why we aren't and it's nothing to do with his pre wedding photo shoot'.

Why was even supposed to be going to the wedding??

florence1234567 · 23/10/2026 12:14

Investigations in indecent images can take many years, this doesn't surprise me.

Janiie · 23/10/2026 12:15

florence1234567 · 23/10/2026 12:14

Investigations in indecent images can take many years, this doesn't surprise me.

8yrs, really??

LizzieSiddal · 23/10/2026 12:16

PistachioTiramisu · 23/10/2026 11:57

How very convenient that this issue has come to light when she is trying to gain sympathy and interest in her exploits!

You do understand her brother reported their father to the police and that is why we all know about it? It had fuck all to do with Meghan.

GoodGirlFaith · 23/10/2026 12:16

florence1234567 · 23/10/2026 12:14

Investigations in indecent images can take many years, this doesn't surprise me.

They can but how about that, the story comes out just as someone is trying to make the UK like H&M again...

LipglossAndLies · 23/10/2026 12:20

Its a good statement from her and I dont think it invites more questions its pretty clear to me thst what she knew and when was in 2028 by the MET, it was distrubing allegations, not proof so obviously she doesn't know anymore than whst was shared with her st the time. She was told it wiuld be investigated and she cut herself off from her father so why would she know anymore other than the results of any investigation.

Its nice she referenced the victims in all this, stark contrast to whst we have seen in the other situation in the RF where noone has talked about the victims, well except one where they tried to discredit them.

AnswerIsNo · 23/10/2026 12:20

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 23/10/2026 12:21

threetrainers · 23/10/2026 11:06

Of course whatever her father may or may not have done isn't her fault, but you'd think some would have learned by now not to leap to conclusions on the basis of no evidence at all

Yep, why did some assume authorities weren’t involved & M discovered this herself but kept quiet? No evidence for that…

I can't answer that, threetrainers, and regardless of the actual truth Meghan covered herself about "Why didn't she say anything" by claiming in the statement that the info was shared with her by the Met Police, the implication being that they already knew

As said, I expected that she'd make abuse claims herself though only after Thomas was dead, but I'm not sure why some are saying the statement was from a source? I could easily be wrong, but everything I've read is saying it's from Meghan herself?

LipglossAndLies · 23/10/2026 12:21

GoodGirlFaith · 23/10/2026 12:16

They can but how about that, the story comes out just as someone is trying to make the UK like H&M again...

Well she isnt the one who went to the press 🙄 his son did, her brother did. Blimey how low do you need to go

hotmumshit · 23/10/2026 12:21

The press

Who hounded her and labelled her an awful person for cutting him off

Who'd interview him and his family in order to embarrass her

Will surely be apologising 🤷🤷

Janiie · 23/10/2026 12:23

hotmumshit · 23/10/2026 12:21

The press

Who hounded her and labelled her an awful person for cutting him off

Who'd interview him and his family in order to embarrass her

Will surely be apologising 🤷🤷

She knew about allegations in 2018. What has anyone got to apologise to her for??

JuliaAgrippina · 23/10/2026 12:23

LipglossAndLies · 23/10/2026 12:00

My posts do not call her a victim.

You write she gets unfair flack oh wsit isnt that what I often say, stop testing down on a woman endlessly. So we agree on that then.

Now you move the goalposts on the wedding from it being about no family being invited to it being about taxpayers money.

You know no I don't find her behaviour odd. I don't slwnd my time or energy concerned over styff from years and years ago about a person I don't know personally. I don't have a parasocial relationship with famous people.

If I did mind about my money being spent on her wedding then I am also going to mind it being spent on any royal family wedding.

My post are readable to everyone - I'm not the one moving goal posts.

I think her behavior around the wedding was extremely off - having one family member there was part of that as was famous people publically saying they'd been invite but didn't know her.

In my first post you chose to comment in I said she got a lot unfair flack.

Hoenstly posters like you do not help her cause at all - make posters like me who have some sympathy think all her supports are as much loons as the attackers and think it's another mucrky as fuck situiation she yet again involved in.

I think you pushed me to the it stinks to high heaven yet again and I can not longer be arsed to work out where the smell is coming from. I'll just go back to assuming eveyone involved is dodgy as fuck.

LipglossAndLies · 23/10/2026 12:23

hotmumshit · 23/10/2026 12:21

The press

Who hounded her and labelled her an awful person for cutting him off

Who'd interview him and his family in order to embarrass her

Will surely be apologising 🤷🤷

Don't be silly just like the posters know the PR disasters thread who over the years have been constantly doing the same, instead they are now zoning in on her statement to continue their awful comments.

GoodGirlFaith · 23/10/2026 12:23

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

No, no quite the opposite! I like Meghan...

MerryAquaKoala · 23/10/2026 12:24

hotmumshit · 23/10/2026 12:21

The press

Who hounded her and labelled her an awful person for cutting him off

Who'd interview him and his family in order to embarrass her

Will surely be apologising 🤷🤷

Oh no one. Until the truth is out. The met need to tell us if they received such a letter, and if so, what did they then do about these accusations of child abuse images?

Janiie · 23/10/2026 12:24

Honestly. You'd really think they'd have got this either proved or disproved years ago.

GoodGirlFaith · 23/10/2026 12:25

LipglossAndLies · 23/10/2026 12:21

Well she isnt the one who went to the press 🙄 his son did, her brother did. Blimey how low do you need to go

Edited

They did and isn't it interesting that this story is relased now?

MerryAquaKoala · 23/10/2026 12:25

Janiie · 23/10/2026 12:24

Honestly. You'd really think they'd have got this either proved or disproved years ago.

That would depend on it being a thing years ago. We only have MM's word for it right now.

Seagullsandsausagerolls · 23/10/2026 12:25

Even if she had have said anything she'd have been called a liar. Like she was about her depression and miscarriage. Her and Harry are far from perfect but nor are the rest of them (and us) you can have compassion even if you dislike a person.

DarthVadersGlove · 23/10/2026 12:26

Triskellion75 · 23/10/2026 09:28

Not to mention Uncle Gary and his criminal conviction for battering wife no4. So refined and classy.

Are you saying that Harry shouldn’t have married who he wanted to marry because her family aren’t up to your standards?

Maybe he thought he could choose his own wife. Maybe he thought he could move to another continent and not be a working royal and then he would be OK marrying who he wanted. And then if his wife disassociated herself with her ‘not refined and classy’ family then people would not have anything to complain about.

GoodGirlFaith · 23/10/2026 12:26

MerryAquaKoala · 23/10/2026 12:25

That would depend on it being a thing years ago. We only have MM's word for it right now.

It was clearly covered up.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread