Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think it’s crazy that National Minimum wage is £27k

663 replies

Butterflyfluff · 09/10/2026 20:08

Yet it’s not really enough to live on 😢

My first job paid £7.5k per year and I thought I was loaded! And I’m not ancient.

Now 2 people on NMW earn over £50k between them yet it’s really not enough these days.

OP posts:
Finta · 12/10/2026 15:45

Maybe pick up extra shifts. Do something at the weekend? Maybe Uber, deliver parcels? Maybe tutor?

Boreded · 12/10/2026 15:50

Differentforgirls · 12/10/2026 15:20

I meant my two are wealthier than my husband and I were at their age, due to their own income. Plus they don't have children yet and we did at their ages - them! 😀

They will get inheritance - maybe. But only from us and not millions!

Their Gran is one of the pensioners who apparently don't exist, the ones living on pension credit and her husband passed away young. My husband's Dad.

My parents have also gone. I got some money from my parents after they died but not the millions people on this thread think every "boomer" had. They were boomers.

Sorry that I mixed you up.

Has anyone used the term boomer so far? I hadn’t noticed it.

They will be wealthier than you were at their age because they don’t have children and we aren’t talking about wealth now in comparison to then. We are talking about millennial income/wealth in comparison to pensioners now, and in the future.

Snowyowl99 · 12/10/2026 16:10

We get by on 52000 between us. Comfortable. One car, two holidays, three children
We don't go put for fine dining meals or designer clothes . Family friendly restaurant and mid price like next. We don't save much tho! Around £250 a month .
I batch cook...but its good healthy unprocessed meals

BIossomtoes · 12/10/2026 16:25

Boreded · 12/10/2026 15:50

Has anyone used the term boomer so far? I hadn’t noticed it.

They will be wealthier than you were at their age because they don’t have children and we aren’t talking about wealth now in comparison to then. We are talking about millennial income/wealth in comparison to pensioners now, and in the future.

Both of ours who are wealthier than us now and when we were a comparable age have children.

Horserider5678 · 12/10/2026 16:57

Butterflyfluff · 09/10/2026 20:08

Yet it’s not really enough to live on 😢

My first job paid £7.5k per year and I thought I was loaded! And I’m not ancient.

Now 2 people on NMW earn over £50k between them yet it’s really not enough these days.

Only, It’s not around £27k! It’s around £24,500 based on working a 37.5 hr week! Most companies are only offering contracts of 30hrs per week, max! This includes companies like Primark, Greggs and most of the supermarkets!

Tharealkate · 12/10/2026 17:08

Snowyowl99 · 12/10/2026 16:10

We get by on 52000 between us. Comfortable. One car, two holidays, three children
We don't go put for fine dining meals or designer clothes . Family friendly restaurant and mid price like next. We don't save much tho! Around £250 a month .
I batch cook...but its good healthy unprocessed meals

would you be willing to share your housing costs and how much your council tax is? And do you receive UC?

I can actually see 50K being more achievable to live on as a family than 25K as a single person for various reasons so actually it’s not that surprising.

The problem is the government doesn’t recognise not everyone is a DINK or a 2 parent family. So for some people earning MW at 37 hours a week that 25/26K is all they’re getting.

Boreded · 12/10/2026 17:55

BIossomtoes · 12/10/2026 16:25

Both of ours who are wealthier than us now and when we were a comparable age have children.

Ok…but that’s a direct reply to me saying I’m not comparing that. So why are you comparing them that way in a direct reply to that comment 🫣

Cottagecheeseisnotcheese · 12/10/2026 18:05

whether NMW is enough depends on where you live and how , if you are living at home with your parents and contributing 2-300 a month for food then you have a considerable amount of disposable income, if you are trying to rent a one bed flat al by yourself in london or SE you will be skint, there are many situations in between

most people starting out would be living at home or in a house/ flat share on a room basis with shared facilities a bit like students

it also depends where you live 1700 a month take home goes a lot further when rent for a room is 450 rather than 850 or when a 1 bed flat is 700 rather than 1200
or when a couple both on NMW live in a 1 bed

DdraigGoch · 12/10/2026 18:35

Constantrunner · 10/10/2026 18:59

Yeah that's what everyone said in the early eighties. Manufacturing destroyed, very high unemployment and on the brink of nuclear war. Except they were wrong. Yes manufacturing was destroyed, but life still got better.

Some communities never recovered from deindustrialisation.

Differentforgirls · 12/10/2026 18:40

Boreded · 12/10/2026 15:50

Has anyone used the term boomer so far? I hadn’t noticed it.

They will be wealthier than you were at their age because they don’t have children and we aren’t talking about wealth now in comparison to then. We are talking about millennial income/wealth in comparison to pensioners now, and in the future.

No they would be wealthier even if they had children. They are millennials.

Boreded · 12/10/2026 18:47

Differentforgirls · 12/10/2026 18:40

No they would be wealthier even if they had children. They are millennials.

🙄

Differentforgirls · 12/10/2026 19:00

I don't know why you're rolling your eyes.

My oldest - 34 earns around £56k. Youngest - 30 earns £97.5k. Youngest has a partner, also 30, she gets around £35/40k. (guess, as I would never ask).

My husband and I were around £40k when we retired. I was lower as I went down to four days 3 years before I retired.

Both are public service workers, so will have good pensions.

I don't know if living in Scotland makes a difference but their friends all earn well too as do our friends children.

SomeoneIsWrongOnTheInternet · 12/10/2026 19:47

rainingsnoring · 12/10/2026 12:55

You are correct, of course.
I don't know why so many people keep talking about huge inheritances. Who knows what will happen in the 30 years or so between now and when millennials (those who are particularly fortunate, rather than the majority)? It could all go on care costs or get lost in a stock market or property market crash. It's very unwise to make assumptions that everything will be marvellous going forwards.

The point about inheritances and these huge inheritances that are going to be passed on is not so much the question of whether there will be anything left, but simpler: not everyone will get them. We are already living in a society under severe stress due to entrenched inequality, with many turning to drugs and crime because working no longer pays.

Add large inheritances given to a favoured few and we are back in the world of Dickens. Worse than the world of dickens, because it is going backwards. You think large parts of the country have nothing to do with you, live completely different lives in different worlds, with entire sections going to lawlessness?? You ain’t seen nothing yet. Those leafy suburbs will just make themselves targets when there’s no point to work at all.

Boreded · 12/10/2026 23:24

Differentforgirls · 12/10/2026 19:00

I don't know why you're rolling your eyes.

My oldest - 34 earns around £56k. Youngest - 30 earns £97.5k. Youngest has a partner, also 30, she gets around £35/40k. (guess, as I would never ask).

My husband and I were around £40k when we retired. I was lower as I went down to four days 3 years before I retired.

Both are public service workers, so will have good pensions.

I don't know if living in Scotland makes a difference but their friends all earn well too as do our friends children.

Edited

Because you are now pretending not to understand inflation, disposable income, and you keep comparing your money then with their money now…the thing I am saying is the problem is pensioners now, have more disposable income than millennials now. AND that millennials will retire with average incomes (adjusted) that are significantly lower than pensioners now.

I mean you do remember how many current pensioners used to be single income families with SAHMs right? In comparison to now that number is huge, because it’s so difficult for millennials to afford to live in single income households.

Pretending to be ignorant to the truth isn’t going to prevent it being the truth. I’ve given you the information, you can google it, but I don’t care to be honest if you decide to opt for wilful ignorance

DdraigGoch · 12/10/2026 23:54

Tharealkate · 10/10/2026 23:38

@MyFairLady27 and everyone else who wants us to believe they get by on 20K and other low sums can you please give a monthly breakdown?

20K is about 1400pcm I think.

Many people have at least £900 to pay in rent or mortgage - so that’s at least 2/3 of their salary gone instantly.

Pay your council tax, mobile phone/broadband, energy and water bills, insurance, travel and the rest of that money is gone even before they’ve even got their food or personal items

Again people making these claims are leaving out important information like they live in a house they don’t pay mortgage or rent on. It’s so deliberately misleading.

Edited

I may have to if I can't find regular work soon. Currently dipping between zero hour contracts whenever I can get hours.

Mortgage is £575pcm.
No car, which is often people's second biggest expense.
Energy £100
Water £45
Cat insurance, vaccinations, medication etc. £50
Mobile £25
Internet £15
House/bicycle insurance £45
Council tax £140

So I could actually go down to around £15,000 gross and avoid starvation, but that would be a rather dull life, and with the risk of being unable to afford a serious emergency (roof repairs are the most likely scenario for me, I think).

DdraigGoch · 13/10/2026 00:29

Allog · 11/10/2026 11:43

try living on the state pension of £12.5k that Andy Burnham thinks is too high.

No he doesn't. And it's plenty to live on if your house is paid for (further benefits are available for low income pensioners who are renting).

Constantrunner · 13/10/2026 00:38

£1000 a month is not loads to live on.

DdraigGoch · 13/10/2026 01:22

Constantrunner · 13/10/2026 00:38

£1000 a month is not loads to live on.

It is if you don't have a mortgage to pay, or you get further benefits that cover your rent.

Constantrunner · 13/10/2026 01:27

It's enough, it's not loads. You still have council tax, bills, food, house repairs, clothes, transport, taxis if you are not very mobile and some fun money from that.

Boreded · 13/10/2026 02:02

Constantrunner · 13/10/2026 01:27

It's enough, it's not loads. You still have council tax, bills, food, house repairs, clothes, transport, taxis if you are not very mobile and some fun money from that.

You are the only one using the term loads…

Differentforgirls · 13/10/2026 05:43

Boreded · 12/10/2026 23:24

Because you are now pretending not to understand inflation, disposable income, and you keep comparing your money then with their money now…the thing I am saying is the problem is pensioners now, have more disposable income than millennials now. AND that millennials will retire with average incomes (adjusted) that are significantly lower than pensioners now.

I mean you do remember how many current pensioners used to be single income families with SAHMs right? In comparison to now that number is huge, because it’s so difficult for millennials to afford to live in single income households.

Pretending to be ignorant to the truth isn’t going to prevent it being the truth. I’ve given you the information, you can google it, but I don’t care to be honest if you decide to opt for wilful ignorance

I’m comparing our salaries of two years ago to theirs today. What kind of inflation do you think happened in two years?

Boreded · 13/10/2026 09:29

Differentforgirls · 13/10/2026 05:43

I’m comparing our salaries of two years ago to theirs today. What kind of inflation do you think happened in two years?

You also said it was 3 years before you retired, you also said you went part time, but ok 👌

Differentforgirls · 13/10/2026 09:34

Boreded · 13/10/2026 09:29

You also said it was 3 years before you retired, you also said you went part time, but ok 👌

No I didn’t. I’ll be retired for three at the end of the year. That is their salaries from last year!

Differentforgirls · 13/10/2026 09:36

And yes I did go part time. Went back full time when they were 10 and 6. Worked full time until three years before my retirement when I went down a day.

Boreded · 13/10/2026 09:44

Differentforgirls · 13/10/2026 09:34

No I didn’t. I’ll be retired for three at the end of the year. That is their salaries from last year!

So then that’s 6 years…because you reduced your salary 3 years before retirement, and you’ve been retired for 3 at the end of the year, that’s 6 years earlier than you reduced your wage.

🤷‍♀️ If you want to twist numbers to suit your narrative then go for it, but don’t expect people not to notice.

And honestly, it really doesn’t matter what your children have, you were wealthy enough to go part time and retire early, they won the birth lottery by being born into a family that could afford to do this. They possibly benefitted in other ways…private school perhaps. Either way we don’t need to talk about your children, they’re not representative of an entire population, we can’t focus on just a small handful of people when we talk about general trends in the economy. You understand that right? That the smaller the sample the more likely you are to have results that don’t meet the trend.

I really don’t understand why you are so adamant that pensioners are not wealthier now than pensioners will be in 10 years, and even wealthier still than those retiring in 30 years. I mean the funniest thing about it is the fact that you evidence the wealth in your own situation with your early retirement and dropping to part time…this generation will not be able to do that in general.

Take these pensioner homeownership statistics for example:

Key Housing and Pension Trends
Rising Renters: According to research by the Association of British Insurers (ABI) and the Pensions Policy Institute (PPI), the proportion of pensioner households owning their homes is projected to drop from 79% to 64% by 2044, while private and social renting among pensioners will rise sharply. 1]
Longer Mortgages: Average mortgage terms for first-time buyers have climbed from 25 years in 2005 to 31 years in 2025, meaning many people will continue paying off mortgages well into their 60s. 1]
The Renting Deficit: Private renting a two-bedroom home can cost between £200,000 and £400,000 over a retirement—an amount that easily swallows the average defined contribution pension pot (roughly £154,000 for men and £105,000 for women). 1]
Retirement Delay: A survey by PensionBee revealed that 51% of UK adults would delay retirement to ensure they own their home outright. 1]

Half of Britons would delay retirement to own home outright

Just over half of UK adults would be willing to delay retirement to ensure they own their home outright, with people prioritising homeownership over pension, according to research from PensionBee

https://moneyage.co.uk/Half-of-Britons-would-delay-retirement-to-own-home-outright.php

Swipe left for the next trending thread