Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To feel relieved the school has now completely banned phones

256 replies

Eastie77Returns · 04/09/2026 14:15

DD’s school has completely banned phones for all incoming Y7 pupils and this will last for the entirety of their time at the school going toward. Existing pupils are still allowed to bring phones in but have to keep to the old rule (if they are seen or heard they are confiscated for 20 days).

DD is Y9 so she will be able to follow the old rule but DS, who starts secondary next year, will not be able to take one in. I honestly feel a massive sense of relief. He doesn’t have a phone at the moment and I was planning to get him an old style Nokia as he isn’t bothered about tech or latest phones. However I was a bit worried that he’d feel left if all his friends had iPhones etc. The school seems pretty serious about it all, all pupils and parents have to sign an agreement and any child caught with a phone will be excluded - no questions asked. The mother of DS’ best friend has now decided she will not send her DS to the school as originally planned as she thinks the ban is reckless and dangerous?! AIBU to think the ban is fine and makes complete sense plus millions of children managed to get to and from school safely without phones a generation ago!

OP posts:
FirmSnake · 05/09/2026 14:04

BrezhnevsLuxuriantEyebrows · 05/09/2026 13:54

What, so they monitor every child and have a profile of all of the school rules that they haven't broken and all the possible miscreant behaviours that they haven't done? "Timmy works hard, is polite and is doing especially well at maths; he doesn't use his phone in class or bully other children for their lunch money and he hasn't - as at this present time - burned the school down"?!

As I've said several times, my DS has occasionally used his phone 'at school' - that wasn't a 'gotcha', if it was meant to be. He has used it from time to time at breaktimes and before/after the school day, when he has needed to contact us.

His school used to have a very sensible, practical rule that allowed the use of phones outside at breaktimes (and of course before and after the school day) - and they rightly clamped down on any student using their phone during lessons; but they decided to change it for everybody - because of the poorly-behaved teens (who still ignore the rule anyway - as poorly-behaved people tend to ignore rules) - to completely ban phones from the premises from half an hour before the day starts to 45 minutes after it finishes; then a few months after they did this, the law changed anyway.

I really think that some adults are summarily incapable of understanding that plenty of teenagers CAN use phones perfectly appropriately; having access to one does not automatically mean that they will be abusing that facility and addicted to it. It reminds me of the early days of the web, when you would mention something that you'd learned and tech deniers/refuseniks who didn't know it would scoff "Oh, is that something that you read on the INTERNET?!" like you were automatically stupid and useless at critical thinking, regardless of whether you'd seen it on crazybobreckons.com or on a government webpage.

Schools monitor patterns of behaviour obviously. Don't be so hyperbolic.

Your kid cant use his phone at school any more. Big deal. Get over it. Back the school up, let them get on with teaching. He will live.

You, and parents like you, are part of the problem. If you kid had followed the existing rules schools wouldn't need to be stricter.

TheAmberKoala · 05/09/2026 14:58

FirmSnake · 05/09/2026 10:40

No, not always. But being able to manage without modern tech sometimes is a handy life skill.

And funny enough, just as using a washing machine doesnt mean you couldnt manage without one, the same can be said for phones. But that doesnt have the same virtue signalling potential, does it?

TheAmberKoala · 05/09/2026 14:59

Puzzledandpissedoff · 05/09/2026 11:01

We all have lots of tools and facilities that we don't need or choose to use all that often, but that doesn't mean that we don't need them sometimes - and also value having them available in case we do need them, even if that doesn't occur very frequently

This makes perfect sense, @BrezhnevsLuxuriantEyebrows, except that too many kids have been allowed to spend so much time on their phones that being without it - even when genuinely not needed - is thought appalling

We've all seen the glazed expressions, and worse, groups of teenagers sitting together with not a word of actual conversation but fingers clicking away madly - and then some wonder what happened to their ability to communicate and focus

And not a hint of irony that you typed this on a forum, likely with glazed expression.

TheAmberKoala · 05/09/2026 15:02

lxn889121 · 05/09/2026 07:18

I never knew that so many children used payphones in the 90s-early 2000s...

As a school aged kid at that time, I don't remember ever seeing a person let alone another child use one.

Somehow I think this is just a quick easy line to discredit the idea that before every child had a connection their parents in their pocket, they actually managed fine on their own..

Where did you grow up, antarctica? Selective memory to virtue signal more like. Payphones were everywhere in the 90s.

BrezhnevsLuxuriantEyebrows · 05/09/2026 23:54

FirmSnake · 05/09/2026 14:04

Schools monitor patterns of behaviour obviously. Don't be so hyperbolic.

Your kid cant use his phone at school any more. Big deal. Get over it. Back the school up, let them get on with teaching. He will live.

You, and parents like you, are part of the problem. If you kid had followed the existing rules schools wouldn't need to be stricter.

Thank you for conceding that schools indeed don't have any way of knowing that 'nearly all of the kids are on their phones', but that they're just lazily tarring all of the kids with the same brush.

You, and parents like you, are part of the problem. If you kid had followed the existing rules schools wouldn't need to be stricter.

I'm not sure whether you're confusing me with another poster, or if you just haven't troubled yourself to read what I've written throughout this thread before nevertheless quoting and responding to it.

If you have/had read my posts, I have clearly said several times that my DS previously followed the sensible rules that were in place, and has continued to follow the new blanket rules, however unfair and ill-thought-out they may be. It is the poorly-behaved/parented kids who ignored the rules before - thus directly leading to the new rules being brought in, but for everybody - and indeed who continue to ignore them; whilst my DS and the other conscientious kids have followed whatever rules were/are in place throughout.

Eastie77Returns · Yesterday 06:07

TheAmberKoala · 05/09/2026 10:24

Not everyone is privileged to live in a safe neighbourhood.

Haha if only. I grew up in crime ridden East London and lived a short walk from a street nicknamed Murder Mile. Yet I walked to and from school on my own from the age of about 9 along with most of the kids in my class. It was considered completely normal. There were no pay phones near the school either:)
I don’t know how we survived😅

OP posts:
LiquoriceAllsorts2 · Yesterday 06:11

There is so much that we need phones for these days that I think banning it can make life difficult. Not so bad if you live really close but if you go direct from school to somewhere else it could be very difficult.

FirmSnake · Yesterday 06:33

BrezhnevsLuxuriantEyebrows · 05/09/2026 23:54

Thank you for conceding that schools indeed don't have any way of knowing that 'nearly all of the kids are on their phones', but that they're just lazily tarring all of the kids with the same brush.

You, and parents like you, are part of the problem. If you kid had followed the existing rules schools wouldn't need to be stricter.

I'm not sure whether you're confusing me with another poster, or if you just haven't troubled yourself to read what I've written throughout this thread before nevertheless quoting and responding to it.

If you have/had read my posts, I have clearly said several times that my DS previously followed the sensible rules that were in place, and has continued to follow the new blanket rules, however unfair and ill-thought-out they may be. It is the poorly-behaved/parented kids who ignored the rules before - thus directly leading to the new rules being brought in, but for everybody - and indeed who continue to ignore them; whilst my DS and the other conscientious kids have followed whatever rules were/are in place throughout.

If your child has indeed always following the rules, and is now surviving a blanket ban, then he obviously does not need his phone at school. So why on earth are you so upset about it?

Smokeywater · Yesterday 06:53

Eastie77Returns · Yesterday 06:07

Haha if only. I grew up in crime ridden East London and lived a short walk from a street nicknamed Murder Mile. Yet I walked to and from school on my own from the age of about 9 along with most of the kids in my class. It was considered completely normal. There were no pay phones near the school either:)
I don’t know how we survived😅

Yes you’re more likely not to be mugged if you aren’t carrying a phone

Flamingojune · Yesterday 07:20

TheAmberKoala · 05/09/2026 15:02

Where did you grow up, antarctica? Selective memory to virtue signal more like. Payphones were everywhere in the 90s.

Edited

Didnt need to use them though

milkysmum · Yesterday 07:36

Our high school isn’t banning, I don’t think many are locally in our area. They are keeping the same rule they have had for years; phones not to be used anywhere on school grounds and if seen using the phone is confiscated until the next day.

LiquoriceAllsorts2 · Yesterday 08:17

FirmSnake · Yesterday 06:33

If your child has indeed always following the rules, and is now surviving a blanket ban, then he obviously does not need his phone at school. So why on earth are you so upset about it?

Sometimes you don’t know you need it until you need it though.

I do think most children going straight to school and back and therefore won’t need it but as soon as you factor other things in it becomes hard.

i wouldn’t be able to go to work without mine, for one thing wouldn’t be able to be guaranteed to use my laptop due to authentication.

granted most 11/12 year old won’t need to do most things that I use it for in a day but a 16 year old may

FirmSnake · Yesterday 08:27

LiquoriceAllsorts2 · Yesterday 08:17

Sometimes you don’t know you need it until you need it though.

I do think most children going straight to school and back and therefore won’t need it but as soon as you factor other things in it becomes hard.

i wouldn’t be able to go to work without mine, for one thing wouldn’t be able to be guaranteed to use my laptop due to authentication.

granted most 11/12 year old won’t need to do most things that I use it for in a day but a 16 year old may

FWIW I dont actually think total bans to and from school are sensible.
But I work in a school and see the issues phones cause. If kids kept them off and in their bags, there wouldn't be an issue and bans wouldn't be needed. Parents moan about phones being confiscated, rather than making sure their child isn't on TikTok in maths. Every parent seems to think their child is the exception, or thinks its fine because they only use their phone in class occasionally....
Schools know kids will still bring phones in. There isn't the capacity to police a complete ban.

BrezhnevsLuxuriantEyebrows · Yesterday 11:38

FirmSnake · Yesterday 06:33

If your child has indeed always following the rules, and is now surviving a blanket ban, then he obviously does not need his phone at school. So why on earth are you so upset about it?

Is there nothing in your own life that you value the convenience and utility of, which you could manage without, but would prefer not to have to?

Are you a driver with your own car? If so, how would you respond if several people who live on your street had been caught speeding, drink-driving or driving without insurance, so your local council somehow brought in a by-law that everybody with a home on your street was banned from owning or driving a car anymore "Because the people who live on Acacia Avenue have clearly shown that they can't use cars safely and appropriately" ?

If that was the case, I'm sure you're a law-abiding person, and so you would comply fully... but would you really just shrug and say "Well, I can still get the bus or taxis to work, to the shops, socialising; and people historically used to have horses and carts or cycle or walk everywhere, and they managed OK... so I've got nothing to be upset or annoyed about" ?

ChalkOutlines · Yesterday 11:50

FirmSnake · Yesterday 06:33

If your child has indeed always following the rules, and is now surviving a blanket ban, then he obviously does not need his phone at school. So why on earth are you so upset about it?

At school? No. Before and after school? Yes.

TheAmberKoala · Yesterday 12:04

Eastie77Returns · Yesterday 06:07

Haha if only. I grew up in crime ridden East London and lived a short walk from a street nicknamed Murder Mile. Yet I walked to and from school on my own from the age of about 9 along with most of the kids in my class. It was considered completely normal. There were no pay phones near the school either:)
I don’t know how we survived😅

So, there were no payphones in East London in the 80s and 90s.
I totally believe you. 😚

TheAmberKoala · Yesterday 12:05

Flamingojune · Yesterday 07:20

Didnt need to use them though

Somehow I think this is just a quick easy line to virtue signal how much better you think you are than the rest of the population.

TheAmberKoala · Yesterday 12:14

The logic of some posters is pretty funny here.
A child age 10 legally needs before and after school care, but come age 11 they can magically go off for hours by themselves, do anything and everything and dont need any way to get in contact with parents or anyone else?
I think these posters are telling porkies about the 80s and 90s because they feel some bizarre need to feel superior. Its weird, honestly.

BrezhnevsLuxuriantEyebrows · Yesterday 12:15

LiquoriceAllsorts2 · Yesterday 08:17

Sometimes you don’t know you need it until you need it though.

I do think most children going straight to school and back and therefore won’t need it but as soon as you factor other things in it becomes hard.

i wouldn’t be able to go to work without mine, for one thing wouldn’t be able to be guaranteed to use my laptop due to authentication.

granted most 11/12 year old won’t need to do most things that I use it for in a day but a 16 year old may

I think it's a complete King Cnut-style response to the matter. Over the past nearly 20 years, smartphones have become an everyday part of life and depended on for so many different functions. Even the word 'phone' is a gross understatement of what they are actually required for nowadays.

It's the same with the internet in general, whereby modern society as we know it would collapse if we suddenly switched it off and stopped using it. So many old-fashioned things have now been done away with, because they're just obsolete and no longer needed now we can do them much more efficiently with the internet.

Because they weren't willing or able to address the specific issues and just said "Phones bad for teenagers!", they're now having to find retro alternatives that are less convenient and more onerous, rather than acknowledge that smartphones ARE essential, but they need to be sensibly controlled and those who have problems with them helped, guided and properly disciplined.

Eastie77Returns · Yesterday 12:19

TheAmberKoala · Yesterday 12:04

So, there were no payphones in East London in the 80s and 90s.
I totally believe you. 😚

No, I said there were no pay phones near my school. Not in the whole of East London - that would be weird😂

I attended a school in Hackney at the bottom of a hill in a residential area and I can assure you there were none.

What is the obsession with payphones on this thread anyway? The refusal of some people to believe we didn’t all walk around in the 80s/90s calling our parents whenever we were out to ask for this that and the other? It genuinely wasn’t a thing where I grew up. Maybe East End kids were built different lol.

I did not habitually carry around a phone card. Any 10ps I had on me were used to buy sweets, not to call my mum and ask permission to cross the road and go to a park after school. Goodness me. If so many parents today expect their DC to call them immediately when a bus is delayed or something upsets them it’s no wonder we have a generation of kids who cannot tie their own shoelaces without feeling triggered!

OP posts:
FirmSnake · Yesterday 12:20

TheAmberKoala · Yesterday 12:14

The logic of some posters is pretty funny here.
A child age 10 legally needs before and after school care, but come age 11 they can magically go off for hours by themselves, do anything and everything and dont need any way to get in contact with parents or anyone else?
I think these posters are telling porkies about the 80s and 90s because they feel some bizarre need to feel superior. Its weird, honestly.

There is no law regarding 10 year olds and after school care.

Eastie77Returns · Yesterday 12:36

TheAmberKoala · Yesterday 12:14

The logic of some posters is pretty funny here.
A child age 10 legally needs before and after school care, but come age 11 they can magically go off for hours by themselves, do anything and everything and dont need any way to get in contact with parents or anyone else?
I think these posters are telling porkies about the 80s and 90s because they feel some bizarre need to feel superior. Its weird, honestly.

My 10 year old goes home on his own after school. He is not interested in after school school club any more. I didn’t realise I was breaking the law🤷🏽‍♀️

OP posts:
TwinklyAmberSloth · Yesterday 13:17

TheAmberKoala · Yesterday 12:14

The logic of some posters is pretty funny here.
A child age 10 legally needs before and after school care, but come age 11 they can magically go off for hours by themselves, do anything and everything and dont need any way to get in contact with parents or anyone else?
I think these posters are telling porkies about the 80s and 90s because they feel some bizarre need to feel superior. Its weird, honestly.

What law would this be?

My 10 year olds and all their friends walk home on their own. Mine have a key to let themselves in. They get back 3.30pm and I'm back 4.15pm.

They don't have phones. When they turn 11 they will be getting brick phones. I don't agree with kids having smart phones.

When they go out they are told what time they need to be back and thats what time they get back.

insomniacalways · Yesterday 14:11

My 15 year old walks 40mins to school and back. I don't track her. Her sister just started the same at 11 no plans to track her either she does have a phone but neither or my kids have been particularly interested in them us ethen to arrange meet ups with freinds /play games. School have pouches for Yr7 new this year. In primary they walked 20mins there are back on their own from Yr5 to 9 or 10. I'm amazed on mumsnet by how madly overprotective people are on Mumsnet. I work in the charity sector around violence against women and girls so very aware of risk and a lot of these tech things give false belief in protection and mean kids grow up not learning to do their own risk assessments

Newname26 · Yesterday 14:23

TheAmberKoala · Yesterday 12:14

The logic of some posters is pretty funny here.
A child age 10 legally needs before and after school care, but come age 11 they can magically go off for hours by themselves, do anything and everything and dont need any way to get in contact with parents or anyone else?
I think these posters are telling porkies about the 80s and 90s because they feel some bizarre need to feel superior. Its weird, honestly.

I don't think there is any law saying children can't be left alone.

But I get what your trying to say, it's no longer socially acceptable to have a latch-key kid.
Yet as soon as they hit secondary people seem to think its fine for them to be walking 3miles without any ability to contact people.

Swipe left for the next trending thread