Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To feel relieved the school has now completely banned phones

254 replies

Eastie77Returns · 04/09/2026 14:15

DD’s school has completely banned phones for all incoming Y7 pupils and this will last for the entirety of their time at the school going toward. Existing pupils are still allowed to bring phones in but have to keep to the old rule (if they are seen or heard they are confiscated for 20 days).

DD is Y9 so she will be able to follow the old rule but DS, who starts secondary next year, will not be able to take one in. I honestly feel a massive sense of relief. He doesn’t have a phone at the moment and I was planning to get him an old style Nokia as he isn’t bothered about tech or latest phones. However I was a bit worried that he’d feel left if all his friends had iPhones etc. The school seems pretty serious about it all, all pupils and parents have to sign an agreement and any child caught with a phone will be excluded - no questions asked. The mother of DS’ best friend has now decided she will not send her DS to the school as originally planned as she thinks the ban is reckless and dangerous?! AIBU to think the ban is fine and makes complete sense plus millions of children managed to get to and from school safely without phones a generation ago!

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
concertinacornflake · Today 01:19

Rubyscurls · Yesterday 23:44

This would put me off a school. I’m with your friend. I don’t understand this recent crop of threads, which bear little resemblance to real life with posters purporting that they have no idea why there would ever be a situation in which a pupil may need to use a phone out of school! If so many parents really didn’t want their secondary children to have a phone, they’d just not provide them with one! There’s a concern about social media, which most parents are concerned about, but that’s not the same thing. It’s just really really odd.

I am also surprised by the posters who want to make all kids travel independently without access to any type of phone. I've never met anyone who holds that view IRL.

Newname26 · Today 00:55

BySharpBee · Today 00:15

Such a good point re. ringing 999 👏. I hadn't thought of that, but you're absolutely right, needing to call because of being a victim of or witness to an unfolding emergency is SO important

One of my kids had a Biff n Chip book with a tale of vandalised phone boxes, it seemed dated 10 years ago.
I couldn't think where our nearest was never-mind the second or third nearest

BySharpBee · Today 00:15

MargaretThursday · 05/09/2026 10:58

As someone who was at school in the 80s/90s I would use one several times a term.
Using a payphone to call home (and to call 999) was part of one of the Brownie badges and I can also remember it being taught in primary school. It was considered something important we should know.

At school we had a phone box and I remember calling for things like

Wanting to join an afterschool activity
After school club cancelled.
Staying on with a friend after school
Going to the library to do some homework
Going to a friend's house
Sport's match finished (for that we used to let the phone ring three time, come off and then do the same again to save the 10p)
Forgotten something
"How's granny?"
If a friend was off ill, we'd often crowd into the phone box to call them at break.

If I'd gone to town with friends, I might call to say I was on the way home, or plans had changed or permission to get something etc.

All those things would probably be done by a WhatsApp message now which is far simpler!

Such a good point re. ringing 999 👏. I hadn't thought of that, but you're absolutely right, needing to call because of being a victim of or witness to an unfolding emergency is SO important

Newname26 · Today 00:08

I don't get it either, the crazy thing is we can't be far off the second generation to grow up with phones.
Those parents are going to be even less likely to support blanket phone bans than the older generation who didn't.

I asked on a previous thread when did phones become the norm for teens, the answer was early 2000s.
Those kids will now be mid 30s, some will have secondary aged kids.

Rubyscurls · Yesterday 23:44

This would put me off a school. I’m with your friend. I don’t understand this recent crop of threads, which bear little resemblance to real life with posters purporting that they have no idea why there would ever be a situation in which a pupil may need to use a phone out of school! If so many parents really didn’t want their secondary children to have a phone, they’d just not provide them with one! There’s a concern about social media, which most parents are concerned about, but that’s not the same thing. It’s just really really odd.

Newname26 · Yesterday 23:05

BananaPeels · Yesterday 22:11

My mum working full time and so wasn’t around but i still had to call her if I wasn’t coming back when expected. she would have gone mental if I didn’t and I wasn’t going to start lying to her if I hadn’t come home at my usual time.

I have to admit I do have to contact my children from time to time at school but I email them and they email me back. They both do a lot of sport so plans sometimes change about arrangements in an evening.

on the way home sometimes we message about odds and ends. I do find it useful. Life is so much busier than when I was a child and it helps for us to be able to communicate if issues in their journey home. I wouldn’t want them to not have their phone in their bag.

My mum used to get me to phone her at work to let her know I was home OK. She's retired 20 years and I still know her works number.

Newname26 · Yesterday 23:01

Kids doing things afterschool is completely legitimate reasons to have a phone.

As I say so many kids leave one house in the morning and go to another afterschool. I can only imagine how hard that must be especially if they need stuff and can't remember which house they've left it in.

BananaPeels · Yesterday 22:11

FirmSnake · 05/09/2026 11:00

My parents were both at work, so wouldn't have known if I was home or not anyway. Mums sat at home waiting for kids to come in wasn't normal in the 90s was it?

My mum working full time and so wasn’t around but i still had to call her if I wasn’t coming back when expected. she would have gone mental if I didn’t and I wasn’t going to start lying to her if I hadn’t come home at my usual time.

I have to admit I do have to contact my children from time to time at school but I email them and they email me back. They both do a lot of sport so plans sometimes change about arrangements in an evening.

on the way home sometimes we message about odds and ends. I do find it useful. Life is so much busier than when I was a child and it helps for us to be able to communicate if issues in their journey home. I wouldn’t want them to not have their phone in their bag.

PurpleThistle7 · Yesterday 22:10

McGregor33 · Yesterday 22:00

I’m the exact same as you. My children are told to put their phones on do not disturb and into their school bag, not to hand them in.

I once called my daughters school to advise my oldest her sister had been rushed for emergency surgery and that she had to go to her aunts after school. The office didn’t pass the message on and she’d went home after school to an empty house!

My daughter was chased home after school by a group of older teenage boys yelling antisemitic garbage at her and threatening to follow her home so they ‘know where to find you all’. She panicked and ran away from home and called me from a few streets away. She was genuinely terrified to come home. I will never ever send her out without a phone after that.

For pragmatic reasons - she has dance after school until 9pm 3 days a week. We carpool with a few families so sort out lifts and such around everyone’s other commitments. Obviously we’d never want her worried if one of her friends wasn’t there or there was an issue with the pickup or anything like that.

If she starts using her phone in class I would fully support the school confiscating it for me to pick up. She’d have serious consequences at home for being so stupid. But as long as she can to keep it away when she’s meant to be learning that’s the end of the school’s vote as far as I’m concerned.

McGregor33 · Yesterday 22:00

PurpleThistle7 · 04/09/2026 15:07

There’s a whole other massive thread on this topic if you look. Hundreds of thoughts on both sides.

For me, I just don’t think anyone has the right to tell me what my kids needs or doesn’t need ‘outside’ of school. Inside of school sure - phones should be off and in bags and if anyone sees one in a classroom it should get taken away. But outside of school it’s my responsibility to decide what my child needs. For both petty and serious reasons my kids will always have a phone with them.

I’m the exact same as you. My children are told to put their phones on do not disturb and into their school bag, not to hand them in.

I once called my daughters school to advise my oldest her sister had been rushed for emergency surgery and that she had to go to her aunts after school. The office didn’t pass the message on and she’d went home after school to an empty house!

Mrssagt · Yesterday 21:26

Eastie77Returns · 04/09/2026 15:03

How frequently does your DS (or any child) need to go to reception to send a brief message to their parent during the school day and for what reasons?

Similarly, the inability to tell you about things needed for school the next day during school breaks..why can’t he just tell you when he gets home?

I’m not being goady, I’m genuinely interested in why this is all necessary. Any parent aged over 40 or so managed perfectly fine at school without mobile phones. I’m intrigued as to why so many of those same parents now think their child’s safety and comfort is at huge risk if they don’t have phones.

Edited

Because the world is not the same now.

I had a free school bus that I could catch. Everyone in my area went to the same school so we all went together.

Also, my eldest dances after school three nights a week - I can’t be there to take her so she has to take herself. If she doesn’t arrive at dance then her teachers assume she’s just not coming. My husband and I wouldn’t know she hadn’t made it to where she needs to be until hours later. She also attends a high school where attendance is valued over health, they also had a lock down last year where all the kids were locked in their classroom store cupboards for hours. The only reason school let parents know about it was because some kids contacted their parents and let them know. The school then tried to lie and say it wasn’t a lockdown.

basically what I’m hearing is that you’re too weak to parent your kids the way you want to, so you think everyone’s kids should be subject to what you want so you don’t have to be the bad guy

Newname26 · Yesterday 21:18

Mama2many73 · Yesterday 20:02

I would want my DC to have access to a phone for travelling to and from school, missed buses, bus break downs, change of plans ie no after school club so just getting school bus home etc.
I agree that it shouldn't be used or seen at all in school and it can just be a Nokia style.
I also dont agree in Schools keeping a phone for 20 days.
For the tracking weve never tracked each other, our kids or foster kids .

I rarely look at the tracking for my son but it is there if I need it.

I also think so many kids live between multiple homes, mums, dads and possibly even grandparents if shifts clash.

Their phone is their only point of contact for friends AND family.

I really don't agree with schools keeping phones either. I actually think its quite cruel to take a kids phone and keeping in for days, never mind weeks.

Melarus · Yesterday 21:02

Eastie77Returns · Yesterday 18:13

It’s not my rule, it’s the school’s decision so not sure why I am BU? As I understand it the exclusion is for a day.

You are BU for not objecting to this aspect of the policy. Making a student miss a whole day of school just for having a phone on them (not even necessarily using it!) is ridiculously draconian. How is that going to help their learning?!

Mama2many73 · Yesterday 20:02

I would want my DC to have access to a phone for travelling to and from school, missed buses, bus break downs, change of plans ie no after school club so just getting school bus home etc.
I agree that it shouldn't be used or seen at all in school and it can just be a Nokia style.
I also dont agree in Schools keeping a phone for 20 days.
For the tracking weve never tracked each other, our kids or foster kids .

TeddieBears · Yesterday 19:51

I really don't think it's that crazy to want children as young as 10 to be able to phone a parent in case of emergency🤷‍♀️

BrezhnevsLuxuriantEyebrows · Yesterday 18:31

insomniacalways · Yesterday 14:11

My 15 year old walks 40mins to school and back. I don't track her. Her sister just started the same at 11 no plans to track her either she does have a phone but neither or my kids have been particularly interested in them us ethen to arrange meet ups with freinds /play games. School have pouches for Yr7 new this year. In primary they walked 20mins there are back on their own from Yr5 to 9 or 10. I'm amazed on mumsnet by how madly overprotective people are on Mumsnet. I work in the charity sector around violence against women and girls so very aware of risk and a lot of these tech things give false belief in protection and mean kids grow up not learning to do their own risk assessments

So if one of your DDs stumbled and fell on the way to/from school, and needed medical assistance as she was bleeding heavily or even broke her leg/arm - or any other medical emergency - do you honestly think that she would not be in any better position if she had a phone to call 999 or you than if she didn't?

Do you travel to and from work without a phone - and think that to have one available would just be over-anxious as you genuinely can't see any reason why one might be very helpful to have?

OneGoldUser · Yesterday 18:14

user293948849167 · 04/09/2026 15:38

I wouldn’t be happy about my child having no way to contact me before and after school (we had payphones in the 90s!).
I wouldn’t like to do my journey to work with no mobile just because if I broke down or something I would literally have no option apart from walking to the nearest bus stop and hoping a bus will pass soon - we are fairly rural and there are no phone boxes on my whole route to work.
Why send off an 11 year old to school with no way to get hold of them? Especially if they’re using public transport.
It would make me think twice about sending my child there too.

No issues at all with mobiles being off and out of site during the school day btw

This 100% I would feel worried doing my commute with no way of contacting help if I needed it, and I’m a capable adult who can change a tyre, read a train timetable etc.
On the (several) occasions that southern railway have just decided to just terminate my train a few stops early leaving me to refigure my route I’ve used Trainline to double check I’m on the right track, literally. Why would I not want my teenager to have access to the same information in order to aid their decision making? I get if they have a short walk to school but most kids aren’t that fortunate and have to use at least 1 type of public transport.

Eastie77Returns · Yesterday 18:13

Melarus · Yesterday 17:43

I don't mind the phone bans, but I voted yabu for this line, which seems a ridiculously OTT policy from the school:

any child caught with a phone will be excluded - no questions asked

It’s not my rule, it’s the school’s decision so not sure why I am BU? As I understand it the exclusion is for a day.

OP posts:
Melarus · Yesterday 17:43

I don't mind the phone bans, but I voted yabu for this line, which seems a ridiculously OTT policy from the school:

any child caught with a phone will be excluded - no questions asked

FancyBiscuitsLevel · Yesterday 17:24

GotMarriedInCornwall · Yesterday 16:50

‘There is always something’
Tell me you don’t live in Cornwall, without telling me you don’t live in Cornwall.

I’m not even in Cornwall and think this is ridiculous! My DCs get the train to /from school. There is no phone box at either station. When a problem on the line stopped all trains around home time, it thankfully happened on a day dh was working from home so could call the DCs to find each other, a coffee shop to wait in and he’d be there as fast as he could. If he’d been in office that day, the option would be a taxi.

watching posters who don’t think you need a phone book a taxi with no phone or internet access would be interesting. (There is no taxi rank outside the station near the school, there’s a list of phone numbers). There may be an option with two buses, of course you’d need to research the bus routes- info isn’t printed out anymore, there’s a website.

We have built systems based round having a phone to access services. They we expect teens to be able to use those services without parents present, so we need to give them phones.

Ladyluck22 · Yesterday 16:53

My daughter started year 7 last year and phones were not allowed in school for all year groups. Works fine has been no major issues, we do live in a large village, so not sure if that makes a difference. She still came home with loads of phone numbers of new friends. A few that did not have phones did find they missed out on the kids meeting up at the wkends etc.

GotMarriedInCornwall · Yesterday 16:53

BelleEpoque27 · 04/09/2026 17:37

Then they go back to the school and ask them for help. Someone will be around.

If the buses aren't running they'll have to walk. I expect the school could email parents if a lot of children are affected.

Honestly, what do people think we did before mobile phones? It's not like there was a payphone every 100 yards. You figured shit out yourself.

My daughter will be travelling 20 miles to secondary school.
Should she walk if the public transport fails?

GotMarriedInCornwall · Yesterday 16:50

T3Tim3 · 04/09/2026 17:33

There is always something. Most of us working parents are in work some without access to a phone anyway, often long distances from where our children go to school so most kids will need to wait anyway and will be probably be better served by using their initiative and thinking of a solution ie travelling to the next station, walking to a bus stop or waiting for the next train. It’s only hard if you make it hard and tell kids it is hard.

‘There is always something’
Tell me you don’t live in Cornwall, without telling me you don’t live in Cornwall.

MigGirl · Yesterday 16:17

milkysmum · Yesterday 07:36

Our high school isn’t banning, I don’t think many are locally in our area. They are keeping the same rule they have had for years; phones not to be used anywhere on school grounds and if seen using the phone is confiscated until the next day.

They will probably end up having to introduce some measures to ensure children don't use them at school as the responsibility is now the schools to ensure the kids don't use them.

We had this rule previously and so did my sons school. The problem is they sneak them into the toilets and use them there.

LostInTheDream · Yesterday 16:10

I think if a school is going to ban phones entirely, they should be reinstating a pay phone and for there to be phones at train stations, bus stations etc.

I didn't call my parents for everything in the 90s, but most people I knew had a BT card that would charge the call to your parents phone bill. I would have called if I knew I'd need permission for something or I knew that it would be a significant worry and I wasn't going somewhere with a landline.

Would be happy for my kids to have a dumb phone that was switched off and there for emergency use. Not a huge fan of tracking my kids or that my eldest seems permanently attached to his screen. The new school rules have meant they get less time on an already very short lunch break to go and collect phones. Not sure that dumb phones would have the same level of disruption or require the same safe keeping.