To almost feel a shred of sympathy for Tommy Robinson

These statements are correct?

Isn’t the population of the UK like 65million

But less than a quarter were not born here.

A quarter of 65 million is.16.25 million.

Perhaps your statistic is including people who worked here temporarily and then returned home.

Half of the population are not foreign born.

Half of 65 million is 32.5 million.

So what is nonsense and what is correct?

Huh?

I get that it feels wick when you find out knowledgeable people know more than you. And did productive stuff to get justice for the victims.

Before some of you realised it was a problem. Before TR came into your lives. Seriously? Not being mean, but have a wee think about that.

If you are relying on any one man to tell you the news, nevermind that drug addled, treasonous, skank, you need to have a word with yerself.🙈🙈

These statements are correct?

Isn’t the population of the UK like 65million

But less than a quarter were not born here.

A quarter of 65 million is.16.25 million.

Perhaps your statistic is including people who worked here temporarily and then returned home.

Half of the population are not foreign born.

Half of 65 million is 32.5 million.

So what is nonsense and what is correct?

These statements are correct?

Isn’t the population of the UK like 65million

But less than a quarter were not born here.

A quarter of 65 million is.16.25 million.

Perhaps your statistic is including people who worked here temporarily and then returned home.

Half of the population are not foreign born.

Half of 65 million is 32.5 million.

So what is nonsense and what is correct?

For 15 million people to have arrived here in 30 years they would have to make up pretty much the entire number of people who are foreign born. To put it another way that means almost all of the people not born in the UK would have had to arrive here in the last 30 years. So no-one still alive today arrived in the UK before 1996? If you look at the population age that seems unlikely. Or, reverse it and consider that of all the total foreign born population of the UK about half arrived in the last 30 years. Which means the total number of foreign born people in the UK would have to have be twice your number of 15 million - 30 million or half of the UK total population. But that's not the case. As the other poster said but this confused you.

That's before you consider that of all the people in the UK who are foreign born every single one of them has to be a foreign born Muslim who arrived in the last 30 years to make what you said true.

And that's before you consider that the actual total number of Muslims in the UK is about 4.5 million and that number includes Muslims who were born here.

I would be interested in where you got your number of 15 million...

Tommy Robinson I expect.

He did a debate against Oxford university students recently.

His entire argument was destroyed. Every single point. Even Jacob Rees Mogg had to comment on how stupid he was.

It’s exposed what he really is - an ignorant, uneducated man who is so gripped by fear caused by a misunderstanding of the world around him, and it’s almost made me feel sorry for him. People like him have been failed - by society, by the education system, and by the people around them.

I was responding to this question

Why is he a boogie man to so many people? It really is fascinating.

It's boogeyman.

Boogie means dance, and no one wants to see him do that.

Oh thank you!

Was just googling boogie man because it made no sense in the context of Tommy ten names

I think there are increasing numbers of Muslim people in charge in the UK - Sadiq Khan Mayor of London, Humza Yousaf was First Minister of Scotland, more are running councils in areas in Lancashire & West Midlands.

Isn’t that part of integration?

Hmm did you see how panicked the room was when they thought Lawrence Fox might show a cartoon of Mohammed. It seemed like the Oxford union might have been concerned about reprisals. Including the muslim president. Which rather proves the point about Islam being a threat to free speech. Tommy Robinson didn’t speak well. I think whatever flaws he has, he was talking about the rape gangs when no one else was and that takes bravery.

Hmm did you see how panicked the room was when they thought Lawrence Fox might show a cartoon of Mohammed. It seemed like the Oxford union might have been concerned about reprisals. Including the muslim president. Which rather proves the point about Islam being a threat to free speech. Tommy Robinson didn’t speak well. I think whatever flaws he has, he was talking about the rape gangs when no one else was and that takes bravery.

@GeneralPeter TR cited various acts and sayings drawn on the Quran or hadith that to modern secular ears are barbaric (treatment of homosexuals, those who have sex outside marriage, child marriage, treatment of prisoners of war, cleansing Muslim lands of Jews and Christians), in support of the argument that the West should be 'suspicious' of Islam.

Imagine what his reaction would be if he delved into the depths of the Old Testament.

Hmm did you see how panicked the room was when they thought Lawrence Fox might show a cartoon of Mohammed. It seemed like the Oxford union might have been concerned about reprisals. Including the muslim president. Which rather proves the point about Islam being a threat to free speech. Tommy Robinson didn’t speak well. I think whatever flaws he has, he was talking about the rape gangs when no one else was and that takes bravery.

When Huw Edwards read the news, the clue is in the name. He literally read it. So while he is a heinous individual, there's no reason to doubt the validity of what was written on his autocue.
SYL is also a heinous individual known to be of bad character and a liar.
When he tells us things, he isn't reading an autocue like Edwards, he's making them up, all by himself. And on many occasions they have been proven false.
Do you see the difference now?