@Positrans
Are you saying that warning about the effects of puberty blockers is not scaremongering, but warning about the affects of not taking them is? I don't get it.
I'll try and help, because there's a lot of misinformation out there.
Taking puberty blockers during puberty, followed by cross-sex hormones (so that a person never reaches full sexual maturity) results in infertility and impaired sexual function. It is right to warn children who are being put on this path that this will be the result of their treatment, and as the recent court case has indicated, it is unlikely that a child would be able to give fully informed consent to this course of treatment.
As for 'the effects of not taking them', the evidence presented to the court by the Tavistock showed that mental health amongst children taking these drugs didn't improve.
“The reported qualitative data on early outcomes of 44 young people who received early pubertal suppression. It noted that 100% of young people stated that they wished to continue on GnRHa, that 23 (52%) reported an improvement in mood since starting the blocker but that 27% reported a decrease in mood. Noted that there was no overall improvement in mood or psychological wellbeing using standardized psychological measures.” (emphasis added)
See paragraph 73 of the judgment.
www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Bell-v-Tavistock-Judgment.pdf
Please share any evidence you have seen about adverse effects of not taking these drugs.