Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

Are my old employers allowed to give this flaky reference?

179 replies

recipw · 11/11/2022 04:25

It seems a bit unfair.

My potential new employer has requested a reference from my old workplace.I left there in June.

They have come back with 'x was employed here from this date to this date, however, can't comment on performance much as off on maternity related sick and maternity leave for a long duration'

Is there anything I can do about this?

Thank you

OP posts:
CloudybutMild · 11/11/2022 08:59

recipw · 11/11/2022 07:27

I didn't want my pregnancy disclosed. It's a bit annoying really. That was confidential.

I don't have a baby from it. She died. So again, I didn't want this disclosed

I am very sorry to hear that, and sorry for your loss.

I understand completely why you would wish it were not mentioned, but as others have said, there has been no wrongdoing by your previous employer in terms of the law.

I hope that things work out well for you, in your new job and outside.

TheWurst · 11/11/2022 09:00

What a shitty situation, I am so sorry you are going through this OP. Regardless of the legalities, it’s still a nasty thing to do and just unnecessary. They could have just written we cannot comment on performance and leave it there, if they felt they had to say anything.

I would contact the new employer and explain what you have said here as to why you were away from work. I’d also ring ACAS and Pregnant then Screwed, they helped me when I experienced maternity discrimination. I would also be looking at leaving my old employer as quickly as possible and doing the absolute bare minimum throughout my notice period. Twats.

VanGoghsDog · 11/11/2022 09:06

It's the potential new employer that has discriminated having got this information. Direct your anger there.

Alliswells · 11/11/2022 09:09

It's very very concerning the level of incorrect advice on this thread. Some of the advice is absolute nonsense.

The employers have done nothing wrong regarding this reference. They did nothing wrong by stating the op had time off and they were correct to clarify it was pregnancy related.

I'm so sorry for your loss OP but your employers have provided a reference that is correct and reflects your time with the company.

It was legally ok for them to clarify your absence as pregnancy related. Your new employers should not use that information to discriminate you, if they do that's who your fight is with.

VanGoghsDog · 11/11/2022 09:10

Aprilx · 11/11/2022 08:50

As above, nobody has said it is ok and in particular in view of the loss the reference wording does appear particularly insensitive (note that quite a lot of responses were before this was known on the thread). But OP has asked whether it is allowed and presumably that means in a legal sense and the answer is yes it is allowed.

It sounds like comments on performance are normal within the NHS, so I think a response such as “cannot comment on performance due to a high level of absenteeism” is far worse than saying it was maternity related leave. In fact I cannot fathom why a job offer would be rescinded because of past maternity leave and would actually ask them what was the reason for that.

Your last point - obviously because they think she has a young child and will not be reliable.

Having a child is not a protected characteristic though.

(Sorry op, to be discussing you this way after your loss, which I was really sorry to read about, and I can imagine this situation is causing you much anguish. Are both roles in the NHS? If so, I think I'd go higher up and complain).

gogohmm · 11/11/2022 09:22

Depends on what the new company asked them, if they asked specifically about performance this is their way of getting out of telling them

CloudybutMild · 11/11/2022 09:23

VanGoghsDog · 11/11/2022 09:06

It's the potential new employer that has discriminated having got this information. Direct your anger there.

How so? The OP hasn’t suggested that they have done this.

TheWurst · 11/11/2022 09:28

VanGoghsDog · 11/11/2022 09:10

Your last point - obviously because they think she has a young child and will not be reliable.

Having a child is not a protected characteristic though.

(Sorry op, to be discussing you this way after your loss, which I was really sorry to read about, and I can imagine this situation is causing you much anguish. Are both roles in the NHS? If so, I think I'd go higher up and complain).

Having a child may not be but women have successfully won tribunals based on indirect sex discrimination where employers have made life difficult for parents, as parenting more commonly falls on women. So it’s not as cut and dry as they can discriminate based on you being a parent.

BaronessEllarawrosaurus · 11/11/2022 09:40

CloudybutMild · 11/11/2022 09:23

How so? The OP hasn’t suggested that they have done this.

The potential new employer has withdrawn the offer, that's the bit that's discrimination

Aprilx · 11/11/2022 09:42

PositiveLife · 11/11/2022 08:53

Of course they've given out medical information. They've said she was on maternity leave and maternity related sick leave.

And of course that is not medical information, that is absence related information which is relatively normal in a reference. Do you think it would have been better for employer to say that she had a significant amount of unexplained absenteeism then?

Katapolts · 11/11/2022 09:49

Even if legally the old employers have stayed on the right side of the law, morally they are disgusting.

Not sure how anyone is genuinely arguing they've 'done nothing wrong'.

Hope you get some good advice from ACAS, Maternity Action or Pregnant then Screwed @recipw

RedWingBoots · 11/11/2022 09:51

CloudybutMild · 11/11/2022 08:55

No, the reason most firms give only the basics is it’s less effort and reduces the chances of a bad employee causing more hassle.

As others have said, if the OP gave permission for the new firm to request one then the old firm can say anything as long as it is true and not misleading.

The reason most firms give the basics is due to post employment discrimination.

There is lots of case law about this.

It was initially kicked off by a organisation I was employed by who had a habit of discriminating against and victimising employees around the world (they no longer exist) but then was tested in the UK appeal courts.

Gr33ngr33ngr4ss · 11/11/2022 09:53

Hmm. I'd be asking why the offer was withdrawn. If it was on the basis that you had maternity/pregnancy related absence, I think that's where the issues lie.

The NHS HR departments are, from my experience, quite on the ball with stuff like this usually.

RedWingBoots · 11/11/2022 09:54

recipw · 11/11/2022 08:22

I will be contact ACAS today. Thank you for that recommendation Flowers

Obviously I have no legal expertise but I boneslrh thought they couldn't disclose my pregnancy and maternity leave - as that's a protected characteristic I thought,, and stating it on my reference disclosed person medical information, and pregnancy related absence should be disregarded?

Anyway, I will contact ACAS and also contact the manager who wrote this reference. I am hoping she will agree to change it to a purely factual reference but it seems the damage has been done as I've got onto Trac jobs this morning and it says under my application 'Offer withdrawn'

I am gutted. I work for the NHS and thought they'd be more supportive

You are better of contacting a discrimination specific charity like Pregnant Then Screwed.

Only because when I had a discrimination case and got initial advice from ACAS, as I had to, they gave me incorrect information. Luckily I had my own union and my own employment lawyer to give me advice plus an recent ex-union rep from a different union and a barrister to give me initial information.

CloudybutMild · 11/11/2022 09:55

Gr33ngr33ngr4ss · 11/11/2022 09:53

Hmm. I'd be asking why the offer was withdrawn. If it was on the basis that you had maternity/pregnancy related absence, I think that's where the issues lie.

The NHS HR departments are, from my experience, quite on the ball with stuff like this usually.

Where are you getting the information from that the offer was withdrawn? I can’t see that the OP has said it was.

CloudybutMild · 11/11/2022 09:57

RedWingBoots · 11/11/2022 09:54

You are better of contacting a discrimination specific charity like Pregnant Then Screwed.

Only because when I had a discrimination case and got initial advice from ACAS, as I had to, they gave me incorrect information. Luckily I had my own union and my own employment lawyer to give me advice plus an recent ex-union rep from a different union and a barrister to give me initial information.

You are writing as though someone’s broken the law here. Who has, and how?

heldinadream · 11/11/2022 10:00

CloudybutMild · 11/11/2022 09:55

Where are you getting the information from that the offer was withdrawn? I can’t see that the OP has said it was.

OP's post at 8.22.

OP I'm so sorry for your loss. This whole situation must be so distressing. 💐

TheWurst · 11/11/2022 10:01

@CloudybutMild - click see all under the OPs post, you will see her latest update.

toomuchlaundry · 11/11/2022 10:01

@CloudybutMild in her post at 8.22. @RedWingBoots has copied it above

CloudybutMild · 11/11/2022 10:04

TheWurst · 11/11/2022 10:01

@CloudybutMild - click see all under the OPs post, you will see her latest update.

Yes, sorry, I’d missed that.

It puts a different complexion on the situation, and must feel like a real hit given what the OP has been going through, but I still can’t see any route for legal recourse.

RedWingBoots · 11/11/2022 10:08

CloudybutMild · 11/11/2022 09:57

You are writing as though someone’s broken the law here. Who has, and how?

The baby died.

If the old employer knew that as they didn't mention it in the reference they have deliberately misled the new employer.

Some discrimination cases aren't clear cut which is why you need advice from organisations/individuals who are use to dealing with complex issues.

RosesAndHellebores · 11/11/2022 10:08

It was not a reference I'd have wanted going out from my department.

If the receiving organisation gave you a copy, they were in breach of data protection regulations. The reference was provided by the sending organisation and you should have been referred back to them for a copy.

RedWingBoots · 11/11/2022 10:11

RosesAndHellebores · 11/11/2022 10:08

It was not a reference I'd have wanted going out from my department.

If the receiving organisation gave you a copy, they were in breach of data protection regulations. The reference was provided by the sending organisation and you should have been referred back to them for a copy.

The receiving organisation may be in breach of GDPR but they clearly had a reason to "accidentally" give the OP a copy.

I know organisations who have done that to other people when they have received bad/nasty references and there have been no repercussions to that organisation.

TheWurst · 11/11/2022 10:18

RosesAndHellebores · 11/11/2022 10:08

It was not a reference I'd have wanted going out from my department.

If the receiving organisation gave you a copy, they were in breach of data protection regulations. The reference was provided by the sending organisation and you should have been referred back to them for a copy.

This isn’t correct, the new organisation can show the person but they have no right to ask the old organisation.

www.gov.uk/work-reference

OP as you can see people on here are not always going to give correct advice. I would rely on Pregnant than Screwed to give you advice, they will put you in touch with a specialist solicitor and the initial call at least will be free.

medicatedgift · 11/11/2022 10:33

RosesAndHellebores · 11/11/2022 10:08

It was not a reference I'd have wanted going out from my department.

If the receiving organisation gave you a copy, they were in breach of data protection regulations. The reference was provided by the sending organisation and you should have been referred back to them for a copy.

No they were not in breach of data protection regulations.