My position has been made redundant as the shop I work in has closed down. I am having trouble getting advice on if I need to work my notice period or not - hopefully someone here can point me in the right direction!
There are three members of the team who have over 2 years length of service and therefore qualify for a redundancy payout and also an extended notice period. One had 6 years service, one 7 and I have 10. Only I have been requested to work my notice period - the others are being paid in lieu of notice.
They were both given their official notice of redundancy one week before I was given mine so they will be paid for two weeks, and three weeks, while I will have to work in a different store (in a different location) for the next seven weeks.
My company have made some concessions to the additional travelling that I will have to do - they are paying for all of my travel and my travelling time will be included in my working day. It is an additional 30 minute commute each way to the new store.
I have raised a grievance with my company for the following points:
- Increased travelling time
- Different job role within a franchised store
- Treated differently to colleagues
They have found that they are not being unreasonable because:
- The travelling time is not a big increase, and they are paying for the travel
- They amended the job role that they initially wanted me to do to carefully reflect my current roles and responsibilities
- They claim that they can ask me to work my notice period in another store because I am management and the other team members are not.
I have been to CAB who referred me to an employment law charity. I did a phone consultation with them but now have heard nothing for two weeks.
Does anyone have any advice, or has been in a similar situation? I am obviously happy to work my notice period, but I am not happy with the conditions that they have proposed. I'm finding the travelling especially difficult as I am 8 weeks pregnant.