Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Work

Chat with other users about all things related to working life on our Work forum.

Would you leave a £250,000pa job to be a SAHM?

1000 replies

misosoup · 27/10/2006 13:43

Ok, I've changed my name for this, not quite sure why....

I really enjoy my job and it is pretty well paid but since I returned to work after having DD2 I have been thinking a lot about this.

I can afford not to work, dh's income is nothing like mine but still above average although it will clearly be a huge drop in our standard of living.

And I miss the kids do much during the day... I spend 2 hours per day with them plus weekends. There is no way I can cut my hours any more and part-time is out of the question.

But I have worked so hard to get here, against all odds. I don't want to throw it all away.

OP posts:
Cappuccino · 06/11/2006 17:24

yes the brick wall was Uwila

who thinks it is better to go out to work and pay someone else to look after your kids in order to get tax credit than it is to stay at home and look after them herself and get benefits

or conversely that only rich people should have kids; or only those who marry rich husbands

I think people like Uwila have even been kicked out of the Tory party now

FioFio · 06/11/2006 17:26

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

FioFio · 06/11/2006 17:28

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

SenoraPostrophe · 06/11/2006 17:30

Can I just butt in here to say how sad I am that I live in a society in which one woman can be ridiculed for taking a small amount of money from the state in order to look after her children, while another agonises over whether to give up around 40 times that amount in order to do the same. It's almost Dickensian.

SenoraPostrophe · 06/11/2006 17:32

actually that was a lie. I don't live in that society. I live in a society where the state doesn't give out enough money for single parents to live on. at least the uk does that I suppose.

TheHighwayCod · 06/11/2006 17:33

wankitty wank

TheHighwayCod · 06/11/2006 17:33

sorry wrong htread

FioFio · 06/11/2006 17:34

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

CountessDracula · 06/11/2006 17:36

can this thread pls be kept going to annoy cod?

Uwila · 06/11/2006 17:37

AS it happens, none of the parties will let me in because I'm not British.

So, you think working for a living is a Toryism, huh?

Xenia, I hope you stick around.

Uwila · 06/11/2006 17:38

Anything for you, CD.

SenoraPostrophe · 06/11/2006 17:40

how is bringing up children not working?

Uwila · 06/11/2006 17:45

it is working. but it isn't working for a living because no one is going to give you a living in return for looking after your own kids.

Judy1234 · 06/11/2006 17:45

Apparently we need more middle class children born so I suppose cutting of incentives for those on low incomes to have children might help the UK a bit. So it looks like these compulsory interviews aren't working and single mothers with school age children can still claim benefits and not look for work. Blair has failed in his plan in that case.

Uwila · 06/11/2006 17:49

I don't see the middle class rising when so many people are stopping haveing kids because they can't aford any more of them. So I guess we are heading for lots of 1 or 2 child working class families. A class of benefits with lots of children. And then I guess the wealthy can also have as many as they like. So, there goes the middle class.

FioFio · 06/11/2006 17:51

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

CountessDracula · 06/11/2006 17:52

"Apparently we need more middle class children born so I suppose cutting of incentives for those on low incomes to have children might help the UK a bit"

Fuck me
It's Adolf Hitler

Uwila · 06/11/2006 17:54

ooooo CD swore.

thankyoupoppet · 06/11/2006 17:56

lol CD

CountessDracula · 06/11/2006 17:56

I swear lots, so what?

I wasn't swearing at anyone it was an exclamation of surprise

Uwila · 06/11/2006 17:57

No you don't. So it's got more impact when you do.

Just glad it wasn't at me.

SenoraPostrophe · 06/11/2006 18:00

uwila - the vast majority of parents on benefits (single or otherwise) do actually work for a living for most of their lives, and pay more into the system than they take out. that is the point of a welfare state. noe if we were talking about 2 parent families choosing not to work then I'd agree with you, but to expect everyone to work even if they are bringing up a ypung family single handed and when the economic benefits of working are marginal is against the spirit of that welfare state imo.

and it doesn't just benefit working class families - even middle class couples sometimes get divorced.

SenoraPostrophe · 06/11/2006 18:01

i think xenia was being sarcy, cd.

advocateofthedevil · 06/11/2006 18:15

My DH pays me £250k pa to be a SAHM. Doesn't everyone's DH do this??

thankyoupoppet · 06/11/2006 18:23

my dh pays me that plus benefits. car, cleaner, annual holiday to st. lucia etc

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread