Due to a shaky financial situation apparently.
What really gets me is the way she said "I'm
afraid I can only offer you 10 hours when you come back".
Erm, it's not a matter of what she can offer me, right? I have a contract of employment for 20 hours.
So why does she feel entitled to cut my hours and not somebody else's? Just because I've been on maternity leave doesn't mean that she should target me rather than someone else, right?
I said I wasn't happy and I advised her to look at the whole organisation and the finances as a whole before deciding to cut my hours in half. She said ok and she'll let me know within 28 days.
Am I not supposed to be part of any consultations re redundancies?