Hello All
I lodged a claim for Sexual Harassment and Discrimination by way of Victimisation which was accepted 3 months ago. Since then I have been further Victimised by my employer, greatly impacting on my health, verified by GP and also the Occ Health, who found the treatment by the company "bizarre" - no (stress) risk assement, no support or training etc. I feel they are trying to manage me out.
I raised a grievance 3 weeks ago, no outcome yet (I know their legal rep is looking into things) but I intend to lodge a further claim of Victimisation after 28 days.
Q. Do I refer to the current case in any particular place of the new claim or does it just go into the main statement box?
The statutory questionnaire was "replied" to a week after I lodged the first claim (exactly 8 weeks to the day since serving) and nearly all questions had a blanket response of "that's not an appropriate request for information, can't see relevance" - even though the questions were standard, such as who was spoken to, when, what were there views etc. The ET3 said that the questionnaire was answered in full (clearly NOT), no adverse inferences should be drawn! I still want to know who took decisions, who was spoken to etc, so ..
Q. In a request for Additional Information, what's the best wording to use to get these questions answered (saying they are standard might not be classed under relevant?), also can I mention that contrary to the ET3, they were NOT answered in full at all?
Thanks for reading :)