No, terrorists are not exclusively or even a significant majority Muslim. Most terrorists are men though.
I never suggested they were. The facts are some muslims are terrorists and by your 'safe guarding' logic they should be banned.
No, and I think that "higher crime rates" needs to be investigated, because there are different types of crime and different cohorts are likely to be represented differently across the crime categories,
So by this logic generalisations are a problem? Thank you for supporting my point.
I disagree with the framing of the question, I think it smacks a little of the racism you are trying to imply I am supporting.
Higher violent crime rates by people of colour are a fact & facts aren't 'racist'. What's racist is to believe violent crime is inherent to a population of which I never suggested.
You are saying that I an falsely equating male trans-identified people with male people. I am not. That is the category they all fall into - male - and male violence toward females and children has a very different pattern to female violence towards females and children, so that is where the comparison must sit. Our argument is that this pattern is what must be recognised for what it is (hint: reality) and that identifying out of maleness does not ensure the adoption of female patterns of violence, and women should not be coerced into believing that it does, and punished when they won't.
You are totally confused. The context here is women's personal experience with trans women being the reason they don't perceive them as threatening not what the generalised data bout men states.
Regarding what you call disinterest in this issue by "women on the ground", I think this is more wishful thinking than reality, poll after poll shows majority men and women support, and are increasingly supporting a return to biological reality in pulic life and policy and I can't see the enormous victories the UK GC movements have recently celebrated happening without a groundswell of grass roots political support. I understand that this is upsetting, but facts are facts.
Did we even read the same essay? JKR explicitly states her disappointment, anger & frustration with institutions & women broadly ignoring the implementation of government guidance. She's admitting herself the changes aren't resonating with actions.
Do you even understand what a poll is? They are notoriously wrong when the rubber hits the road because Its one thing to state your beliefs but quite another to act on them hence JKR's frustration.