Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

“Our facilities are places of privacy, dignity and respect. We ask you not to approach or question anyone about their use of facilities as this could constitute harassment”

87 replies

BlueOrangeRed · 13/10/2026 18:58

In my work I sometimes visit universities and saw this on a poster today in the ladies toilets.

Is this the latest thing following the single sex spaces Supreme Court ruling? It’s the first time I’ve seen something like this.

I’m quite interested to know if it was put up following someone complaining they’ve been approached or questioned. Or whether it’s more of a preemptive attempt to ensure no one is ever questioned or approached.

OP posts:
Shedmistress · 15/10/2026 08:19

BlueOrangeRed · 14/10/2026 18:45

I agree. It wasn’t just the message that irked me, but the way it was expressed, which felt like an appropriation of the language used to argue for single sex toilets. Maybe I should email the EDI email address and say my ‘safe space’ of the women’s loos no longer feels safe.

Good point on whether the same sign is up in the men’s toilets!

You don't do ANYTHING with the DEI department, you send it anonymously to the Board and the Legal side. Or get someone else to.

BCBird · 15/10/2026 08:20

I think i would vehemently want yo question someone but faced with them in an enclosed space would probably freeze. Looking for a new job- dreading this.

Screamingabdabz · 15/10/2026 08:27

Ugh the sign is correct as in it is not up to individuals to police single sex spaces. But equally these are university students, young, impressionable, not used to being gnarly or objectionable. It’s grooming them to be accepting of male dominance and that their right to privacy and dignity isn’t the priority.

The only chink of light is that it’s been written because some brave soul has challenged someone. Good.

MagpiePi · 15/10/2026 08:40

If you stood still and made a direct statement like 'This is the women's toilets, you should not be in here' you would not be approaching or questioning anyone so would it still be considered harassment?

OriginalSkang · 15/10/2026 08:45

I would think there must have been an incident to have this sign up. I work at a university and have never seen a sign like this in any toilets on campus

Kave · 15/10/2026 09:12

Justme56 · 14/10/2026 13:23

I would disagree. Just because something ‘could’ constitute harassment (as written) it does not mean that it does. Harrassment in law I believe, usually consists of 2 or more incidents and also needs a ‘reasonable’ test. Is it reasonable to ask an obvious male to leave a female toilet?

This has been posted as a reply to the wrong person. Sorry. It’s aimed at whoever said nobody should ever challenge behaviour. No wonder standards of public behaviour are falling! Policing of rules has always been partly by the general public commenting unfavourably, or at least ‘tutting’ on breaches. Littering, spitting, pushing & shoving onto buses, cat-calling all require at least a disapproving glance. Otherwise, how do people know it’s disapproved of? I can understand being scared or doing things differently in different situations. I was horrified when my then 4 year old ran up to a group of bikers to tell them off for littering. They meekly picked the litter up & put it in a bin. Public convention says no M in F spaces, we have a right to say so.

MarieDeGournay · 15/10/2026 09:28

OriginalSkang · 15/10/2026 08:45

I would think there must have been an incident to have this sign up. I work at a university and have never seen a sign like this in any toilets on campus

If there was 'an incident', why didn't they put up big signs saying that toilets are designated by biological sex, and calling on people to respect that?

They could even have added 'Persistent use of the wrong facilities could constitute harassment' - since they seem to like that slightly threatening phrase that starts with the vague 'could'.

But instead they picked the side of telling women to be quiet.

nicepotoftea · 15/10/2026 09:43

Universities have always been hotspots for twatty men who want to erode women's boundaries by telling them they are frigid/bourgeois/stupid/unkind

Unless the OP missed the poster telling people to use the correct facility, this just encourages more of the same.

OriginalSkang · 15/10/2026 10:04

MarieDeGournay · 15/10/2026 09:28

If there was 'an incident', why didn't they put up big signs saying that toilets are designated by biological sex, and calling on people to respect that?

They could even have added 'Persistent use of the wrong facilities could constitute harassment' - since they seem to like that slightly threatening phrase that starts with the vague 'could'.

But instead they picked the side of telling women to be quiet.

Yes, all valid and you're right

Wishesandhorses · 15/10/2026 11:11

Quite.

Full on embracing of male supremacism. Women, shut up, put up and self exclude if necessary (particularly more vulnerable groups of women) so men can do whatever the fuck they want and have everything all the time with no responsibilities.

Women who are able may have the crumbs left over after the men have been served.

'Dignity and respect' - delusional.

akkakk · 15/10/2026 11:17

AmberTigerEyes · 14/10/2026 13:15

Of course the sign is legally compliant. What is not legal is regular people taking it upon themselves to enforce a law. The law only allows police officers to do this. Confronting someone who is potentially dangerous to police whether or not they are in the right toilets is vigilantism. It is illegal to be a vigilante and take the law into your own hands. Make a note, snap a photo and file a complaint.

The only exception to this is if an actual attack is underway, then you can try and intervene physically if you want to.

Tosh

you do know that the police are a relatively new invention - and the ability to uphold the law has been within society for far longer - church wardens for example have powers of arrest in their parish and have had since the 1100s - normal members of the public have powers of arrest - it is why it is known as a citizen's arrest...

do you have the first clue as to what vigilantism actually is? it wouldn't appear that you do...

of course normal respectable humans should intervene - the police and law enforcers are there as public servants on behalf of the public - it is the public that decide what the laws are by electing politicians / and how they should be enforced - so for any member of the public to uphold the law is normal and acceptable...

Awkwardisfunny · 15/10/2026 11:23

BlueOrangeRed · 13/10/2026 18:58

In my work I sometimes visit universities and saw this on a poster today in the ladies toilets.

Is this the latest thing following the single sex spaces Supreme Court ruling? It’s the first time I’ve seen something like this.

I’m quite interested to know if it was put up following someone complaining they’ve been approached or questioned. Or whether it’s more of a preemptive attempt to ensure no one is ever questioned or approached.

Take it down and put up your own poster describing the law and that breaching it is an invasion of women's privacy and dignity.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page