I wondered whether, in between these two views (dedicated TRA ideologue and has knowledge but can’t use it) that she sees the harm, but feels it’s so heavily embedded that she needs conclusive proof to shut the whole thing down properly and internationally, not just in the UK. Guess that’s close to @Seethlaw s theory, but without her having specific information she can’t use.
If she simply cut out UK use of PB, without conclusive proof, it will linger, through illegal procurement and internationally, possibly making a comeback.
I don’t understand her at all though and her current push for it to go ahead seems extreme, compared to what I had expected, which was that she would stop after all the abuse she received. The idea that she might have caved to the abuse to reach her current situation is too unpleasant to contemplate.