“You’re asking me to ignore the evidence of my eyes and ears for the last 5 years and believe that everyone I’ve interacted with and use gendered language just decided to collectively humour me.”
Coming back to this.
You have said that you understand that transgender activism has gone too far. You have also shown your reaction to people using correct sex language.
Yet, you believe that no female person has correctly identified your sex in the past.
As a female person, I can assure you that there is no way that I would give any indication to a male person who had a transgender identity that I understood they were male in their presence. I don’t know many of my friends who would. I wouldn’t use female language for them, but that would be the only indication.
Some organisations have policies that make it clear that even misgendering will be considered something that will have a negative consequence to the person using accurate language.
Yet, you claim that no female in the past five years has correctly identified your sex category. Do you see how little credibility your statement has?
Again, recognising material reality (facts) is not ‘ideology’. If male people who have had their puberty blocked and have access to facial reconstruction still are easily identifiable as male, why the fuck do you believe that male people’s sex category is not accurately identifiable by some female people?
No male person over the age of 8 years old should be ever using female single sex provisions.
And no male person should be making statements about how they have not caused harm if they have accessed female single sex provisions. Any male person accessing female single sex provisions causes harm at a collective level to female people, but potentially also at an individual level.
That is why it is not up to a male person to decide whether or not their access to a female single sex provision has caused harm or not.