This will be very interesting - get popcorn!
Michael Foran is The Expert in UK discrimination law and is a staff member of Oxford University
The same University doesn’t seem to have taken any action about Biggus Tittus, or prevented targeting of other staff previously, suggesting a widespread problem.
Michael has had his advice followed by UK government and has launched a book that will become THE guide to equality law in the UK. So he probably knows more about the law in this area than the Uni… under normal circumstances this might make an organisation careful not to break the law especially with this staff member…
Instead:
Michael tries to give a series of lectures on the topic of law within the university
The book launch itself was not disrupted.
Lecture 1 was slightly disrupted by protesters (?) and I assume that this was flagged to the university to take action.
Lecture 2 was disrupted and threats made to identify and doxx attendees on social media.
On any other topic this type of disruption would be a disciplinary process against the students - cf Connie Shaw or Brodie Mitchell being threatened by their universities with expulsion for expressing GC views (without disrupting any lectures or any threatening behaviour as seen at Michael’s recent lectures).
Lectures 3 & 4 were cancelled due to this intimidation and bullying of staff and students.
If I were a betting woman I imagine a complaint has been made to the university about the lack of assistance to stop unacceptable disruption, threatening behaviour and sanction these individuals from the university.
I imagine this has been done entirely properly within the complaints procedure. And entirely within the rules which would - if necessary - allow the Office for Students as regulator to pick up this complaint…
The case against Sussex might have collapsed due to poor procedure but I if this matter runs its course in the way im suspecting then I think that there is unlikely to be repeat of that problem here. So hopefully - theoretically- we might eventually get to see the nub of the problem discussed in court, rather than lose on procedural grounds before substantial matters can be aired.
If Oxford University hasn’t twigged this then they are idiots. If theyve decided to ignore it and bend to the TRAs they’re foolish given what happened at Sussex. If they don’t get a grip /make a stand then at some point they’ll have to justify all of this in court, with all the attention and reputational damage that it will bring.
i predict that this going to be very interesting