Help end medical misogyny. Sign our petition.

Help end medical misogyny.
Sign our petition.

Sign the petition

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

M&S Colchester claim mixed changing is ‘completely safe’ for women.

437 replies

PeachOctopus · 27/05/2026 12:31

How is it that M&S can continue to flaunt the high court ruling and do not offer single sex changing rooms?

Abouterf in this video confronts the store manager and is fobbed off and told that it’s head offices policy:

Colchester @marksandspencer I asked where the women’s changing room was to try on swimwear. Manager Andrew (he/ his /him) says gender neutral changing areas are “completely safe” for women and girls. For asking him this question, he told me to leave the store.

Abouterf x account

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
RedToothBrush · 03/06/2026 12:36

thedramaQueen · 03/06/2026 09:13

Interesting you don’t mention being concerned about private sector or foreign companies/ governments being involved identity card schemes…

That wasn't my point. And I've always been firmly anti-id cards. I wasn't getting into a debate about whether we should have ID cards. My point was about the slurs we receive and it was about any ID that we do get (whether I want it or not) is actually accurate rather than gas lighting nonsense that ignores women's consent and women's privacy and dignity.

RedToothBrush · 03/06/2026 12:37

But you probably know this already.

Mmmnotsure · 03/06/2026 12:37

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

It’s unclear how you want that read. Punctuation would help.

RedToothBrush · 03/06/2026 12:41

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

thedramaQueen · 03/06/2026 12:42

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I wasn’t but never mind. I feel sorry for you that you feel the need to be rude about a complete stranger.

As for my punctuation I’m dyslexic. Come on have a go at me for that too!

thedramaQueen · 03/06/2026 12:47

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Can you please point to my horrible views. Thank you

Easytoconfuse · 03/06/2026 15:52

thedramaQueen · 01/06/2026 16:04

I was talking in general terms. But there is no doubt by sharing this on social media this has resulted in publicly shaming the member of staff and may have for all we know resulted in him being bullied as his details have been revealed publicly. All of that should be illegal.

If groups like sex matters are so convinced that the law has been broken by M&S let them put their money where their mouth is and take them to court.

Edited

But we don't know that he's been bullied, do we?I'm sure M&S would have mentioned it because it'd fit their agenda so nicely.

Easytoconfuse · 03/06/2026 15:53

thedramaQueen · 01/06/2026 16:04

I was talking in general terms. But there is no doubt by sharing this on social media this has resulted in publicly shaming the member of staff and may have for all we know resulted in him being bullied as his details have been revealed publicly. All of that should be illegal.

If groups like sex matters are so convinced that the law has been broken by M&S let them put their money where their mouth is and take them to court.

Edited

Why should women have to pay to be treated with respect?

Easytoconfuse · 03/06/2026 15:58

FairCat · 02/06/2026 00:27

Another day, another MN thread linked on X to reinforce the message that people on here are batshit. Good work.

The video that sets out to discredit M&S is a ridiculous own-goal. Everyone can see it's contrived nonsense staged to whip up division. The joke is that almost everyone goes to M&S and knows that their facilities are fine.

For the majority, who don't waste their lives obsessing about changing rooms and toilets, the sympathy is firmly with the poor retail worker who was undeservedly splattered across social media and doxxed. Imagine going to work tomorrow and having that happen to you.

He's not breaking the law. He's enacting company policy and there's nothing in the SC judgement that obliges M&S to do anything more than they are doing. Nothing.

The SC judgement will spell the end of single sex facilities, no business is going to risk prosecution by instructing staff to police them as demanded by the absurd EHRC code. Retail staff can't even intervene if someone is blatantly shoplifting, they certainly can't be expected to challenge women for not looking feminine enough, and it is women who will get the worst of it.

If the hysteria continues, ordinary women who are too old or too tall or too athletic or have short hair or are not white enough, will routinely experience fear and intimidation. Is emboldening gender vigilantes the route to a safer world for women? Really?

Almost everyone goes to Marks and Spencers - their profits say otherwise

People on MN are bat-shit - your opinion. You're entitled to it. Luckily, most of us here are too polite to tell us our opinion of you.

I could pick apart everything else you've said just as easily but you won't hear anything you don't want to. You're just here to tell us all how wrong we are and how mean and nasty we are compared to paragons of perfection like you.

thedramaQueen · 03/06/2026 16:06

Easytoconfuse · 03/06/2026 15:53

Why should women have to pay to be treated with respect?

I’m not saying that women should.

Charities often take up causes when they think the law needs to be challenged or is being abused/ broken.

I thought that was one of the main functions of sex matters maybe I’m wrong here. If it is then why haven’t they done so yet?

MyLuckyHelper · 04/06/2026 12:18

Easytoconfuse · 03/06/2026 15:52

But we don't know that he's been bullied, do we?I'm sure M&S would have mentioned it because it'd fit their agenda so nicely.

Yes, we do. We can see the comments and responses under every place it was posted/shared.

PollyNomial · 04/06/2026 13:21

Easytoconfuse · 03/06/2026 15:52

But we don't know that he's been bullied, do we?I'm sure M&S would have mentioned it because it'd fit their agenda so nicely.

He was doxxed by Anya Palmer, who for many reasons, should know much better than to do something which only results in harassment and bullying. If Jolyon had done the same to a female store manager we'd be furious and rightly so.

Easytoconfuse · 06/06/2026 15:48

PollyNomial · 04/06/2026 13:21

He was doxxed by Anya Palmer, who for many reasons, should know much better than to do something which only results in harassment and bullying. If Jolyon had done the same to a female store manager we'd be furious and rightly so.

Thanks for this. I'm genuinely interested to know if there are cases when a transgender supporter has been harrassed and bullied. Not point scoring. Just want to look at them and see how they compared to the ones I know of from the other side.

LumenLights · 08/06/2026 12:21

No one should be filmed when at work and have their image posted all over the internet without their permission. Even if they are a MANAGER OF A STORE.

I have never in my life expected a standard changing room in a high street store to be a single sex space.

I do expect the bra fitting changing rooms to be single sex.

I keep seeing this Colchester M&S situation come up on social media and I think it embarrasses us. I haven’t seen MF’s letter but I’ve seen the response from M&S and I can’t help but feel it makes the gender critical movement (with which I am fully aligned) look like it’s full of bored agitators.

impossibletoday · 17/06/2026 11:39

.

M&S Colchester claim mixed changing is ‘completely safe’ for women.
KnottyAuty · 17/06/2026 11:46

impossibletoday · 17/06/2026 11:39

.

He totally dodges the question... how does he define "woman"?
If he uses the new modern inclusive version then this letter is complete BS

tartyflette · 17/06/2026 12:00

tokennamechange · 27/05/2026 22:24

primark do the opposite - mixed gender and female but no male only. Primark reintroduces women-only fitting rooms - BBC News

A lot of posters on here are mixing up a policy that is unfair/unwise/nonsensical (all of which I agree providing male and mixed gender changing rooms but no female equivalent are) and one that is illegal which it is not.

Because there's no law saying shops HAVE to provide changing rooms at all there's no law saying that they have to provide single sex changing rooms, or if you decide to provide male changing rooms you also have to provide female ones, or vice versa.

I'm surprised at so many people assuming that if you have 1 'thing' reserved for one sex you legally HAVE to have equal provision for the other sex. Have you not noticed, for example, ladies only swim sessions at pools, girl only coding classes, female self-defence classes, brownies, school football teams where boys play football and rugby and girls netball and hockey, etc.?

Well, it may not be actually illegal currently but stores, clubs etc could be leaving themselves open to civil legal challenges as well as to adverse publicity and local opposition, all of which are highly detrimental to the institutions in question.
And some of the examples given — self-defence classes can certainly be male only as well as female only, school sports teams likewise (plus mixed sex) swim sessions at pools can also be children only, seniors only, beginners only — need I go on?
So separate sessions are available in lots of areas for many differing groups, can I suggest that if you are lacking a male only group for something where you think it may be necessary, that you organise it yourself?

ScribblingPixie · 17/06/2026 15:27

KnottyAuty · 17/06/2026 11:46

He totally dodges the question... how does he define "woman"?
If he uses the new modern inclusive version then this letter is complete BS

"...our preferred practice which is to have single sex facilities..."

socialdilemmawhattodo · 17/06/2026 15:56

God I love that woman. She is polite, respectful, articulate, humorous, knowledgeable and like a dog with a bone. Girl crush over here.

HermioneWeasley · 17/06/2026 17:50

Her response is so beautifully written

RedToothBrush · 17/06/2026 18:05

"Archie, you are a fuckwit who isn't running your company. Get your head out your arse and on the shop floor and see how your company is actually being run and why I'm having to write to you about this bullshit in the first place. You haven't actually answered my question properly and you are feeding me lipservice. Do I look stupid or something? Now, single sex is single sex. Its not changing rooms in the vicinity of. It could do with a sign like 'Men's', 'Women's' and 'Mixed' which is what the public actually want. You know, in line with both the law and safeguarding customers. Instead of pretending you give a shit about customers, actually give a shit about customers. Thank you old chap. Yours The Baroness"

Mouldemort · 17/06/2026 19:01

The Sex Matters campaign against trans woman has born its inevitable fruit in the latest EHRC guidelines. The easiest way for providers to comply is to offer mixed sex fitting rooms. You reap what you sow.

It's entirely reasonable to offer suggested changing areas for men and women, and open them up to others if they are single occupancy cubicles. Are they effectively mixed sex and trans inclusive? Yes, they are. The only thing that will happen if Sex Matters does more lawfare is that all fitting rooms will end up mixed sex.

And haranguing low level staff who have no control over company policy is a dickish, entitled move.

RedToothBrush · 17/06/2026 19:03

Mouldemort · 17/06/2026 19:01

The Sex Matters campaign against trans woman has born its inevitable fruit in the latest EHRC guidelines. The easiest way for providers to comply is to offer mixed sex fitting rooms. You reap what you sow.

It's entirely reasonable to offer suggested changing areas for men and women, and open them up to others if they are single occupancy cubicles. Are they effectively mixed sex and trans inclusive? Yes, they are. The only thing that will happen if Sex Matters does more lawfare is that all fitting rooms will end up mixed sex.

And haranguing low level staff who have no control over company policy is a dickish, entitled move.

It's not a campaign against transwomen. It's a campaign for womens privacy, dignity and safety - rights we have in law which aren't being upheld.

HTH.