Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Cameron Diaz “has third child” aged 53

138 replies

Namingbaba · 06/05/2026 17:00

It worries me that some people just read headlines like this and think all these women have children naturally. At least that’s the impression I got from reading the comments on this story. The surrogacy sometimes isn’t even mentioned.

OP posts:
Dancingsquirrels · 07/05/2026 10:04

OnlyMabelInTheBuilding · 06/05/2026 17:30

It’s hideous to add a baby to your family at 53, however you buy come by it.

Sefish and vile.

Out of interest, and genuine question - do you feel the same about men fathering children aged 53?

sittingonabeach · 07/05/2026 10:06

@Dancingsquirrels I think 53 is too old for anyone to become a parent of a newborn

Dancingsquirrels · 07/05/2026 10:07

sittingonabeach · 07/05/2026 10:06

@Dancingsquirrels I think 53 is too old for anyone to become a parent of a newborn

Yes I agree, just wondered if other people felt the same

BridgetJonesV2 · 07/05/2026 10:12

I've got a work colleague who is a Dad to two young toddlers at 58. He's a physical and mental wreck most of the time, he's absolutely exhausted. His wife is in her late 40s, gave birth at 47 through use of fertility drugs. The oldest child is autistic with serious behavioural issues, and the youngest is showing all the same signs (both non verbal).

It's so morally wrong on every level to have children at these ages, when a lot of people that age are in fact grandparents. Add in buying the child just because you want it? There should be laws preventing anyone buying a child in the first place let alone someone heading towards old age. Surrogacy should only exist for relatives/close friends to altruistically carry a child and no money ever changes hands.

PumpkinsAndCoconuts · 07/05/2026 10:20

OnlyMabelInTheBuilding · 06/05/2026 18:47

He doesn’t need a surrogate, the woman does.

If he wants to have a child with her, he definitely needs it as well…

Lins77 · 07/05/2026 10:30

Dancingsquirrels · 07/05/2026 10:07

Yes I agree, just wondered if other people felt the same

Not necessarily. I was 38 when my daughter was born, my husband was 51. DD is now 20 and although her dad is older than those of most of her contemporaries, it's never been an issue.

ChocolateAddictAlways · 07/05/2026 10:32

BridgetJonesV2 · 07/05/2026 10:12

I've got a work colleague who is a Dad to two young toddlers at 58. He's a physical and mental wreck most of the time, he's absolutely exhausted. His wife is in her late 40s, gave birth at 47 through use of fertility drugs. The oldest child is autistic with serious behavioural issues, and the youngest is showing all the same signs (both non verbal).

It's so morally wrong on every level to have children at these ages, when a lot of people that age are in fact grandparents. Add in buying the child just because you want it? There should be laws preventing anyone buying a child in the first place let alone someone heading towards old age. Surrogacy should only exist for relatives/close friends to altruistically carry a child and no money ever changes hands.

Wow. Toddlers at 58.

PumpkinsAndCoconuts · 07/05/2026 10:38

Dancingsquirrels · 07/05/2026 10:04

Out of interest, and genuine question - do you feel the same about men fathering children aged 53?

I personally do. 73 by the time your child turns 20? Wow.

But it’s worse when both parents are 53 to be perfectly honest.

MagpiePi · 07/05/2026 10:52

likelysuspect · 07/05/2026 07:45

Yes its likely she was the driver, men arent as motivated as women to have children. There are some outliers and it doesnt mean he didnt want a child at all, but statistically its more likely the drive came primarily from her.

What about all the gay men who are now buying surrogate babies?

Tbf a lot of them come across as wanting a child as a lifestyle accessory rather than it being driven by a deep biological urge.

MassiveWordSalad · 07/05/2026 10:54

Dancingsquirrels · 07/05/2026 10:04

Out of interest, and genuine question - do you feel the same about men fathering children aged 53?

I do. It’s irresponsible for anyone to have a baby at that stage in their life. Whilst men don’t lose their fertility in the same way women do, sperm quality decreases and there are increased risks of miscarriage, premature birth, congenital heart defects, and increased neurodevelopmental risks. And how is it fair for a child to have a father who will be rapidly heading to old age when they are a teenager?

loislovesstewie · 07/05/2026 10:56

BridgetJonesV2 · 07/05/2026 10:12

I've got a work colleague who is a Dad to two young toddlers at 58. He's a physical and mental wreck most of the time, he's absolutely exhausted. His wife is in her late 40s, gave birth at 47 through use of fertility drugs. The oldest child is autistic with serious behavioural issues, and the youngest is showing all the same signs (both non verbal).

It's so morally wrong on every level to have children at these ages, when a lot of people that age are in fact grandparents. Add in buying the child just because you want it? There should be laws preventing anyone buying a child in the first place let alone someone heading towards old age. Surrogacy should only exist for relatives/close friends to altruistically carry a child and no money ever changes hands.

Who will care for those children when the parents can't?

MassiveWordSalad · 07/05/2026 10:57

All surrogacy is human trafficking and people like Cameron Diaz putting a glamorous face to it are legitimising the less salubrious baby farm businesses in places like India and Ukraine.

florence1234567 · 07/05/2026 11:33

The problem I see with the whole thing is that it's most likely not her own eggs (unless she froze them many years ago).

I always thought it was rather selfish to use an anonymous sperm or anymous egg donation.

In my opinion a child should have a right to find out their genetic link.

Everyone should be able to know where their biological roots are.

likelysuspect · 07/05/2026 11:40

MagpiePi · 07/05/2026 10:52

What about all the gay men who are now buying surrogate babies?

Tbf a lot of them come across as wanting a child as a lifestyle accessory rather than it being driven by a deep biological urge.

I didnt say that no men whatsoever want children

I said it was likely she was the main driver of this.

That is fairly common in male/female relationships

MassiveWordSalad · 07/05/2026 11:43

florence1234567 · 07/05/2026 11:33

The problem I see with the whole thing is that it's most likely not her own eggs (unless she froze them many years ago).

I always thought it was rather selfish to use an anonymous sperm or anymous egg donation.

In my opinion a child should have a right to find out their genetic link.

Everyone should be able to know where their biological roots are.

I think a child also has a right not to be taken away from its mother - the woman who gestated it - straight after birth, unless there are absolutely dire circumstances to warrant it. It’s widely acknowledged that this is detrimental to the child, but this fact is completely ignored in the surrogacy business.

Cheese55 · 07/05/2026 11:43

florence1234567 · 07/05/2026 11:33

The problem I see with the whole thing is that it's most likely not her own eggs (unless she froze them many years ago).

I always thought it was rather selfish to use an anonymous sperm or anymous egg donation.

In my opinion a child should have a right to find out their genetic link.

Everyone should be able to know where their biological roots are.

They can find out, you have to agree to be contacted when the child becomes an adult

sittingonabeach · 07/05/2026 11:53

@Cheese55 only in certain countries, and you still have to wait until you are 18. Many countries/clinics still have anonymous donors and also unrestricted number of donations.

There was that recent case where it was found that donor carried a cancer gene and he had fathered nearly 200 children. That cannot be ethical

Cheese55 · 07/05/2026 12:40

sittingonabeach · 07/05/2026 11:53

@Cheese55 only in certain countries, and you still have to wait until you are 18. Many countries/clinics still have anonymous donors and also unrestricted number of donations.

There was that recent case where it was found that donor carried a cancer gene and he had fathered nearly 200 children. That cannot be ethical

Was he someone people found on fb? Don't clinics screen to stop this happening and restrict the number of babies one donor is used for

TiredOldHen · 07/05/2026 12:48

loislovesstewie · 07/05/2026 09:43

I find that gross. If it was a man married to a woman the same age as his daughters people would think that , what's the difference?

You sound very young.

They have been together for over 20 years and seem very happy and compatible. There is no money or power imbalance and no incentive to be together other than they want to be. She has not ‘bought’ him, they both work and are on the similar levels financially. This smacks a bit of the idea of old people having sex is yucky. 😊

sittingonabeach · 07/05/2026 13:16

@Cheese55 it was something that can be screened for and other countries don’t limit the number of donations used, and indeed donations are sent to clinics across the globe including UK ones

The donor/donations were through official clinics.

sittingonabeach · 07/05/2026 13:18

@TiredOldHen i think it is more the thought of having a relationship with someone similar age to their adult DC that people are finding yucky

LondonTipton99 · 07/05/2026 13:27

Westfacing · 07/05/2026 08:34

I can understand an older woman wanting a baby if in her younger years she didn't meet the right partner; or had children from a previous partner and desperate for one with the latest beau. Not everyone can follow the usual path to marriage and motherhood

But according to Wiki, Cameron Diaz has been married to the same guy for 11 years and they already have two children! IMO it's an indulgence to lumber a child with a 53 year-old mother - she may be gorgeous, healthy and wealthy but she's still 53

But at the same time, no one has the right to have a baby, even if you really, really want one. If it doesn't happen to you in your younger years for whatever reason, does that mean you ignore what's best for the potential baby and do it anyway later on and in whatever way possible? No matter your age, or whether there will be a father or not?

LondonTipton99 · 07/05/2026 13:30

florence1234567 · 07/05/2026 11:33

The problem I see with the whole thing is that it's most likely not her own eggs (unless she froze them many years ago).

I always thought it was rather selfish to use an anonymous sperm or anymous egg donation.

In my opinion a child should have a right to find out their genetic link.

Everyone should be able to know where their biological roots are.

Rather selfish is an understatement!

I think purposely going it alone (even if you have read the profile of the donor and the kid will potentially be able to make contact at 18) is still abhorrent. Of course even worse if it's anonymous. Just awful to inflict that trauma on a child.

Cheese55 · 07/05/2026 13:44

LondonTipton99 · 07/05/2026 13:30

Rather selfish is an understatement!

I think purposely going it alone (even if you have read the profile of the donor and the kid will potentially be able to make contact at 18) is still abhorrent. Of course even worse if it's anonymous. Just awful to inflict that trauma on a child.

There is nothing wrong with bringing up a child without a father. Sometimes this is better

sittingonabeach · 07/05/2026 13:46

@Cheese55 I don’t think you should purposely bring a child into this world without one