Amelia Connolly of the Scottish Greens remanded on CSA charges

[ArabellaScott]

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/trans-pro-indy-campaigner-caught-37097962

Amelia Connolly - of the Scottish Greens and previously independence campaigners is being held on remand in a male prison.

He has also asked to take back his earlier guilty plea.

Its interesting to note that the article starts with female pronouns but appears to change partway through and ends up theythemming Connolly.

I guess its the sex offender gender rule coming into play.

Literally illustrated.

There's a definite pattern to these men, isn't there...

And there's always a Sturgeon picture.

Not because I think anyone will know, but just from observation I'm now wondering: how many in the Greens at this point have a history of activity that should be of potential concern to a party that felt it had the ethics, the values, the gravitas and the basic qualifications to be in positions of trust and public responsibiliy?

And how many in that group of such people are men with trans identities? Because this is less a unique event than a sense of 'and here we go again'.

With Greens becoming a serious option for - well, less protest voting than absolutely despairing 'which least damaging maniacs might do the least harm in power' voting - people really need to know the full picture of what they are voting for. This is so frequently thrown aside as 'just culture wars/fringe issue'.

I saw “Amelia” and “child sexual abuse” and I just knew it was going to be one of those women with a penis. It works every time - almost as though women don’t actually commit significant levels of CSA. Only men - even those who think they’re women.

It's amazing how many they are and how easily found.

Yep me too, also “Scottish greens” - almost as though there’s a pattern here

Confusion as Scots trans sex offender referred to as a woman in court thanks to Nicola Sturgeon's gender ideology - Scottish Daily Express

A reminder that Connolly is remanded and trial has not yet happened so he is innocent until proven otherwise.

Here is his website, which offers his side of the story, as well as an illadvised link to his OF.

This man appears to be disturbed, deluded, and yes, vulnerable.

www.amelia.scot/

Indeed. I marvel at how confident a lot of Greens are in this regard. They may very well win quite a lot of seats in the coming elections, but the darker "issues" beneath the surface of many of these male Greens (candidates or not) will come to the surface eventually.

How many candidates/supporters with criminal convictions for nasty crimes do the Green leadership actually want?!!

You'd think they'd consider rooting these people out, before standing next to them for photo opps.

Me, too. So predictable.

I hate that the first article uses ‘child porn’ - images of child abuse.

also not surprised it’s a woman with a penis 🙄

I don't like what the Greens have become. But thy are certainly digging up the dirt on them.

Its her legacy.

I wonder if Sturgeon knows that, in the end and wider scheme of things, these problematic issues are the only things most people will remember about her?

cancel connolly - a website exposing him as an abuser, set up a while before he was charged for CSA imagery

Does anyone know if the Greens have received any funding from pro-trans sources?

I know that the Liberals got hefty donations from the pharmaceutical company that makes Lupron. I was just wondering if there's a financial incentive for the Green Party to have so many transwomen candidates?

It really seems bizarre that they learned nothing from the Challenor scandal.

Yet here you are inciting comment and research. Do you want to prejudice the process?

I feel as if these days the more responsible a position (at least in theory - elected representative, senior manager) a person holds, the less likely they are to deserve to do so. Definitely in the Greens, but it applies elsewhere too (Post office, NHS).

It's almost like the modern world is selecting for abusers to run things.

It is perfectly normal for people to share newspaper articles and discuss the news.

Given this is a politically involved public figure, its important people are informed.

A good safeguarding culture is one where we can discuss themes and red flags. A lot of the comments here are general. Like for example why so many red flags are ignored over and over and over again around men who are later investigated by the police for paedophilia.

But I'm unsurprised that some people want to stop others from talking about certain news items.

Indeed

'Inciting' is a loaded term, isnt it?