Amelia Connolly of the Scottish Greens remanded on CSA charges

[ArabellaScott]

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/trans-pro-indy-campaigner-caught-37097962

Amelia Connolly - of the Scottish Greens and previously independence campaigners is being held on remand in a male prison.

He has also asked to take back his earlier guilty plea.

Regardless of the outcome of this narrow court case, it seems clear that anti-safeguarding things like referring to men with female pronouns and obscuring their sex class are not positive for most of society. Especially children.

And when such men are arrested for alleged harms to children, the fact that the media still won't tell the truth about their sex suggests they too want to obscure this relevant fact. My question is why (I think I know why).

And it's not a million miles away from why Epstein was allowed to carry on with what everyone in his orbit knew he was doing and didn't stop it. Or why the grooming gangs were allowed to torture and rape children for so long with the institutions paid and set up to stop it not only not stopping it but enabling it and setting up the children to be trapped.

There are many people now being associated who probably weren't involved in any crimes, but they sure as hell looked the other way.

And there's a question about why so many people who simply have the bravery to speak the truth with integrity and honesty are expelled from organisations like the Greens whilst others - who objectively behave more badly - remain.

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/sex-offender-caught-ai-child-214316115.html

'They were immediately suspended by the Scottish Greens following the outcome of the court case, but the Scottish Daily Express have revealed that the party were informed about their alleged sexual misconduct in November 2025. An email was sent to party bosses and the Scottish Young Greens raising a number of concerns about them.'

It was sent 11 months after they were originally arrested by cops and had their home raided. At the time, they served as the Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Officer for the Scottish Young Greens, and continued in this role until the end of 2025, it is understood.

According to the Greens, they were removed from this role after the allegations were sent to them, although the complainer who sent the email didn't get a reply to their concerns. But they remained an active member of the party, as evidenced by TikToks.'

How many more?

There seems to be truth to saying it is a feature, not a bug.

More.from the Yahoo article:

'Published in February and March this year, the first showed them asking a question to co-leader Gillian Mackay at the Greens conference, and the second video showed them knocking doors for the far-left outfit in Stirling. Just a month later, they pled guilty in court for AI child porn.

It has led to calls for the Greens to explain why they were allowed around potentially vulnerable members. Scottish Conservative justice spokesman, Liam Kerr told the Scottish Daily Express: “This is an outrageous failure by the Scottish Greens to act on explicit safeguarding warnings.

“Concerns involving potential risks to children were put to them in black and white, yet no action appears to have been taken. That is a shocking dereliction of their duty to protect young people. The Greens must urgently explain how this was allowed to happen and who took the decision to ignore these warnings.'

'A Greens spokesman said: “Steps were immediately taken to remove the individual from their role when allegations were first raised with us late last year. At that point their membership should have been suspended entirely, pending investigation. We are now urgently reviewing the handling of this situation and why that action was not taken at that point and we unreservedly apologise to those who contacted us.'

Give over with your conspiracy adjacent stuff, I'm a radical feminist, I just respect the justice process.

Connolly's LinkedIn still says he is the EDI officer for the Young Greens.

Another one? There's definitely a pattern here.

I'm happy to hear that he's being remanded in the male prison where he belongs.

You think the justice process is working well for victims?

It's possible it's a typo, with "c" being inconveniently right next to "v" on most keyboards. But in that case, if I was responsible for the typo, I'd be inclined to admit to it.

Actually, I'm unclear on the process here. Connolly plead guilty on the charge of possession of CSA images. And was to be sentenced, hence court appearance.

But now appears to want to recant his guilty plea. Is it even possible to do that?

He was in court for sentencing, plus a different contempt of court charge.

Same here! What a strange coincidence that pretending to be female gives a man far greater access to children …

A bloke in a blokes jail. Move on, nothing to see here 😉

Just had a look on his website. And he's got a Roblox group. Because of course he has... 🚩🚩🚩 😬

And almost as though the people who are actually working hard to make society a better place are too busy to involve themselves endlessly in genderwang!

Remember when politicians saw themselves as part of the communities whence they came, and their roles as helping to better their communities, rather than better themselves?

The company he runs is some kind of Roblox group/software.

There is this on withdrawing a guilty plea, but it's not for Scotland.

https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2025/909/part/24

24.10

Grim.

That is a real problem.

Men who don’t try to break down women and children’s boundaries are not abusers by definition but men who do break down women and children’s boundaries in their day to day life are also going to have among them the men who abuse children.

It stands to reason.

If you are a male boundary breaker you are in among the subset of men who break the boundary that endorse and carry out abuse of children.

There is also a pattern in so many TQ+ youth groups completely ignoring even basic safeguarding to the detriment of the children and young people who join them. These associations have become access all areas hunting grounds for men with fetishes.

I suspect that like Reform, many Green candidates aren’t particularly au fait with political process/government. They may get lots of seats, but their behaviour will be scrutinised and they’ll find being a local councillor tedious and unrewarding in terms of ability to make a big difference. If you make a total cock up by declaring some virtuous policy which sends your council a hefty bill for no worthwhile outcome, it will be noticed. And most of what you want to do, you’ll be told isn’t possible.

They could really do with attending safeguarding sessions run by churches and scouts. The ‘build and they will come’ principle of safeguarding seems to be sadly lacking, and the youth they are attempting to serve are presumed to be more vulnerable than most. So they most definitely will come.

Reform councillors/councils are finding this out.

It's easy to be the "party of protest", until you actually have to do some stuff.