Kellie-Jay Keen (AKA Posie Parker) removed from IWD event by police

[ImTooMessyButImTooClean]

https://x.com/theposieparker/status/2029940578528473283?s=46&t=p6GESSn09HWHVXYgTLIbJg

“My removal from the international women’s day event by the police.

I had been asking women’s organisations whether their services were for women only. This caused alarm and distress and the venue, claimed to be privately owned when it’s owned by the council, asked me to leave for asking questions.

I have footage of every interaction that I will upload later so you can see what those questions were and you can judge for yourself.”

I think, if asked, MNHQ would not agree my few posts on this thread could be defined as disruptive and disrespectful. At least, I haven’t accused others of being male or a plopper. As for alter ego - you are aware usernames can’t be changed on the same thread, aren’t you?

So, 7 years ago? Much can happen in the political landscape in 7 years, let alone a personal one. Her politics has changed outwardly in that timeframe.

I watched a video in which she said that unions were all misogynistic, and that it was a waste of time joining the Gala, because of this or words to that effect.

That rings a bell so I understand now what you were getting at. She has actually been very supportive and paid for the materials for the first banner we took, which was a Standing For Women banner in a traditional style (photo attached).

The Unison head-butting incident was probably due to the fact that we also had banners supporting the Darlington Nurses - a banner for each nurse, naming and supporting her. If the woman who assaulted the LWS member was not the sister of "Rose" Henderson then she was her doppelgänger.

We have chatted to union groups every year and some have been very supportive. It was very encouraging that the all-male delegation for the Prison Officers Association knew that men were being incarcerated with women and were 100% opposed.

and PM you under a different name

I remember ❤️

i am going this year and will try and find LWS if they have a contingency

If you are a LWS member we will be advertising in the "Nest" where and when we will be meeting and we will have a LWS Banner to help you to find us 👍

Photo attached of some of us at the IWD Suffragette March at Beamish Museum on Sunday with the LWS North East Banner.

they can walk under or behind our miners wives banner for protection.

That is brilliant! Not that we need protection but that a women's group would actually support us and want to be associated with us. When you attend, you will see what I mean.

As usual, we are up against the massed ranks of the female, left-wing #bekind brigade who are carrying banners. A stark contrast to women lining the streets watching the procession, who cheer us on, hold out their hands to take our leaflets and some have even come through the barriers to march with us.

It is a very visible demonstration of how far removed the trade union elite and organisations of left-wing women are from public sentiment on this issue.

If the miners wives are with us that is a very big deal and would be an important signal to the Left that they might actually pay attention to. Possibly in a good way although they are quite capable of noticing and, as a result, branding them bigots.

That said, the Gala is still a few months away and there is enough time yet for your group to be subverted by a "concerned" drag queen or a woman who has a "trans kid" in her family 🫣

Seems unnecessarily messy to negotiate when it’s just an anonymous chat forum.

did the title of this thread get changed?

did it always have the bit aka

Oh, I agree. Just pointing out that your defence that you hadn't contributed to this thread under two different names because the forum software doesn't let you doesn't hold a lot of weight. A simple claim of "I really couldn't be bothered" is more credible, in my eyes. As you were.

What's the validity period on clear and transparent rejection of white supremacy and racism? How often does it need to be renewed to be acceptable? Not asking for a precise answer, of course, but a general idea of your feeling in terms of every how many weeks, months or years this sort of thing needs to be repeated would be helpful. Ta.

Ideally, first thing every morning and last thing every night, straight after brushing your teeth. Only way to make sure that you don't turn into a racist, white supremacist in your sleep.

Define 'anti trans ideology'.

Oh it's back to tone-policing women I see. She didn't speak in a soft dulcet tone? She was assertive. Heaven forbid a woman or feminist be assertive. It's enough to beg for your rights, you must do it plaintively in a soft submissive tone or else you are not 'polite' like all good women should be.

FMD sometimes it really is like being in the 1940s still on here.

For some on here, assertiveness is 'impolite'. They really can't see their internalised misogyny.

FYI, I said “polite” as the poster I was responding to had used that word. I don’t care if she is polite or not, but doing things that bother others in a venue (such as filming them when they don’t wish to be filmed) could land anyone in trouble.

Not sure really. I’m only aware that many people have had their minds changed on political issues quite significantly over the last few years, steered primarily by online algorithms. Who creates the content to do so then? Worth considering.

Look; either you lied to us on this thread about what KJK said to him, or he lied to you about what KJK said to him.

One or the other. The fact that you could lie and smear a woman so easily, or that he could lie to you, con you and manipulate you so easily to believe his scheming lying, is bad. If he lied to you, do you realise how manipulative he is and that he is playing you for a fool? That he is not this innocent 'vulnerable' act he portrays?

Which is it? Please answer.

I don’t care if I’m credible to you or not. Simply because two or so (2) posters out of the 30 or 40 contributors to this thread do not have the exact same world view as you, your immediate thought is …. they must be the same person! Sorry to disappoint you.

Was there any reports of anyone asking not to be filmed?
Usually if people are filming in a venue where people don't want to be filmed the normal reaction is to ask them to stop filming, not call the cops for them to be manhandled out and force everyone they are with out as well.

In this video (embedded in one of KJK’s tweets, all her questions are answered politely and happily until she brings up ‘men with penises’ towards the end, throwing off the interviewee who then states KJK can’t share what she she has filmed. KJK then turns her back with an “Oh, I can, I absolutely can,” and points to the neighbouring police stand - “Ask them.”

A later video shows another woman from the venue asking KJK to leave “as they’ve had complaints - you’ve been upsetting people,” KJK refuses and says to call the police. This then occurred.

Whoops - link:

https://x.com/theposieparker/status/2030579103615660493?s=61&t=3wYru9P_J0h74BXKFXAfmw

But she was happy to be filmed until the topic of men came up?

That's where the bus stop is!

You seem to have misssd the point of the relevance of the date. Not to worry, it was not a post that was addressed to you.

The point being that a poster used the interview to support her being a white nationalist simply for doing the interview. The poster has done little research of their own despite crowing about their research skills.

Has her politics changed? I don’t believe you have established that at all in your posts. You have made accusations without providing support for those accusations.

And she still didn’t tell him the things you said she did. Meaning you falsely represented the interaction. Either he misrepresented it or you chose to misrepresent it. Either way you accused her of saying something she did not say.

This echoes my views too. And you haven't wasted your time typing it out because hopefully people reading it who may believe the lie about 'terfs' being 'transphobic' will understand that that is a lie.
Other than the actual - small number - of genuine TRAs, I think the vast majority who go along with this misogyny do so because they have had the wool pulled over their eyes by lies and obfuscation.