Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Rhode Island - Another crossdressing male mass shooter

183 replies

fromorbit · 17/02/2026 04:52

Mourn the victims.

Robert K. Dorgan ("Roberta Esposito") killed two people and critically injured three others.

Rhode Island hockey shooter ID’d as transgender father Robert Dorgan
The suspected shooter sat near the back of the stands on the home team’s side during the game before he moved to the front and opened fire at four family members and one family friend, the outlet reported.
The student’s mother and sibling were among the dead, multiple sources told the outlet. The mother of Dorgan’s child died inside Lynch Arena, while the sibling died at the hospital, according to the sources.

https://nypost.com/2026/02/16/us-news/robert-dorgan-idd-as-rhode-island-hockey-shooter/

He was active on social media threatening violence and attacking women who knew biology.

More details on the background

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15565931/Hockey-shooting-Rhode-Island-Robert-Dorgan-transgender.html

A lot of the coverage seems to be calling him a guy this time.

Stop this madness!

Obviously one must suspect Dorgan was inspired by the Tumbler ridge killer these type of evil men imitate each other.

How long are we going to let this happen?

Rhode Island hockey shooter ID’d as transgender father Robert Dorgan

Pawtucket Police Chief Tina Goncalves said that Dorgan, 56, also uses the alias Roberta Esposito.

https://nypost.com/2026/02/16/us-news/robert-dorgan-idd-as-rhode-island-hockey-shooter/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
17
CraftandGlamour · 18/02/2026 10:10

"But society in general certainly lacks the lens to understand his sexualised, 'woman face' as abusive or offensive."

Cannot be overstated.

nicepotoftea · 18/02/2026 10:11

likelysuspect · 18/02/2026 10:06

This is what happens when society loses 'judgement and shame' and embarks on 'accept people for who they are'.

No thank you.

I think 'accepting people for who they are while holding them to ethical standards' is good.

The problem here is forced acceptance of people for what they are not while also abandoning ethical standards..

ArabellaScott · 18/02/2026 10:11

nicepotoftea · 18/02/2026 09:28

"Experts caution against jumping to broad conclusions, noting the shooting appears to have been a deeply personal and family-related incident."

'family related'. As though there might be some kind of justification for their deaths.

Except nobody can say that the usual refrain - 'He was such a lovely man, we were so surprised, it came out of nowhere, he just lost it' - applies here.

'Deeply personal' misogyny and narc rage?

Fucksake he deserves no sympathy.

ArabellaScott · 18/02/2026 10:13

nicepotoftea · 18/02/2026 10:11

I think 'accepting people for who they are while holding them to ethical standards' is good.

The problem here is forced acceptance of people for what they are not while also abandoning ethical standards..

Its waffle, though. 'Who they are' - what does it even mean?

nicepotoftea · 18/02/2026 10:27

ArabellaScott · 18/02/2026 10:13

Its waffle, though. 'Who they are' - what does it even mean?

Maybe tolerance is a better word? I'm really talking about people who would previously have been described as 'marching to the beat of their own drum', and I think it's good to understand this because many young people are drawn to 'inclusivity' because they genuinely are 'kind'. I don't think that is bad.

So acceptance of girls who do not conform to gender norms, but as they really are - girls, not boys.

That contrasts with e.g. co-opting other people into a fetish or forcing people to participate in a fantasy.

Helleofabore · 18/02/2026 10:45

FeralWoman · 17/02/2026 19:49

@MoistVonL Apparently the different legal teams are so that the lawyers don’t have to deal with any conflict of interest, which they might have if representing both.

@Helleofabore It’s very sad. Something about that little boy has got to me.

@HidingBehindTheWallpaper A 4yo boy named Gus Lamont went missing on September 27, 2025. Despite extensive searches involving hundreds of people, including the army, mounted police, an Aboriginal tracker (their tracking skills are remarkable), helicopters, motorbikes and so many police officers, there hasn’t been a single trace of him found. Nothing. He’s just vanished. He lived on a remote farm with his mum, baby brother, his maternal grandmother and his maternal grandfather who identifies as a trans woman. The father of Gus and the baby lives elsewhere. The grandparent referred to as Josie is the trans grandparent. This gives a bit of a summary after Gus was missing for 2 months:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-11-29/the-search-for-gus-lamont-has-included-dams-mines-and-scrub/106055504

Here’s a current update.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15566023/Gus-Lamont-search-water-tank-outhouse-dogs.html

Thanks Feral.

The fact that he is still being searched for leads me to think that the police have suspicions and are being professional about how they conduct this case.

Helleofabore · 18/02/2026 10:49

The new reporting where the person being discussed is being referred to as if the writer and audience don't know that person's sex leads to having to reread sentences to ensure the correct interpretation.

The more I see neutral pronouns and language being used when the sex of a person is known or can be very clearly identified, it is reinforcing in my mind that this also is harmful as it creates ambiguity and obfuscation where there should be none.

TeaAndStrumpets · 18/02/2026 12:31

Helleofabore · 18/02/2026 10:49

The new reporting where the person being discussed is being referred to as if the writer and audience don't know that person's sex leads to having to reread sentences to ensure the correct interpretation.

The more I see neutral pronouns and language being used when the sex of a person is known or can be very clearly identified, it is reinforcing in my mind that this also is harmful as it creates ambiguity and obfuscation where there should be none.

Dr Bowdler lives!

likelysuspect · 18/02/2026 12:34

nicepotoftea · 18/02/2026 09:24

From the reporting, certainly not by her family, although that didn't stop them paying the cost for his behaviour.

But society in general certainly lacks the lens to understand his sexualised, 'woman face' as abusive or offensive.

Woman face

This cannot be said enough, this needs repeating over and over and needs to be just as inapprorpriate as black face now is.

likelysuspect · 18/02/2026 12:37

nicepotoftea · 18/02/2026 10:11

I think 'accepting people for who they are while holding them to ethical standards' is good.

The problem here is forced acceptance of people for what they are not while also abandoning ethical standards..

Yes whose ethical standards though, because dare we stand on the apparent 'wrong side' of those standards and this is what you have now. We apparently are on the wrong side.

Its not just small businesses, its big organisations like thr NHS, its also governments like Canada and global governing bodies like the EU parliament.

KnottyAuty · 18/02/2026 12:40

UtopiaPlanitia · 18/02/2026 02:03

Whaaaat?!?! Urgh

Rhode Island - Another crossdressing male mass shooter
KnottyAuty · 18/02/2026 12:43

TeaAndStrumpets · 18/02/2026 08:47

Ms Goncalves said at least three bystanders were able to contain Dorgan, who reached for a second gun and shot themselves.

This jumped out at me from Sky News. They are evidently trying hard not to use himself/ herself, and have ended up implying he was somehow plural.

At first glance I thought the bystanders had reached for the gun and shot themselves 🙄

likelysuspect · 18/02/2026 12:44

nicepotoftea · 18/02/2026 10:27

Maybe tolerance is a better word? I'm really talking about people who would previously have been described as 'marching to the beat of their own drum', and I think it's good to understand this because many young people are drawn to 'inclusivity' because they genuinely are 'kind'. I don't think that is bad.

So acceptance of girls who do not conform to gender norms, but as they really are - girls, not boys.

That contrasts with e.g. co-opting other people into a fetish or forcing people to participate in a fantasy.

Women (and girls) have not 'conformed' to sex norms ( I wont use the word gender) for nearly 100 years and further back

When I was growing up an androgynous look (as one example) was everywhere, for males and females, wear what you want, do what you want, embark on what career you want.

Its only in the last 15 years or so that girls apparently are seen as odd or needing to 'be a boy' if they dont conform to sex stereotypes. This is something thats been created in order to support the ideology, not the other way round.

Helleofabore · 18/02/2026 13:01

TeaAndStrumpets · 18/02/2026 12:31

Dr Bowdler lives!

Maybe you could explain this please ?

TeaAndStrumpets · 18/02/2026 13:19

Helleofabore · 18/02/2026 13:01

Maybe you could explain this please ?

Dr Thomas Bowdler published an expurgated version of Shakespeare by taking out anything (he considered) rude. About 1800 or so. Very much foreshadowed Victorian prudery. Refers to censorship.

nauticant · 18/02/2026 13:21

And gave us the verb bowdlerise.

Datun · 18/02/2026 13:23

nicepotoftea · 18/02/2026 09:36

I think there is a post on X where he talks about his bottom surgery and he also talked about how surgery was funded.

Yeah, call me a cynic but I'm not convinced.

It's entirely possible, of course. It doesn't stop these men being full of rage.

But it's the whole bodybuilding thing that's making me wonder. Would a person that into gym work reduce their testosterone by removing its source? Although I note he was saying he takes testosterone.

So who knows

Helleofabore · 18/02/2026 13:26

TeaAndStrumpets · 18/02/2026 13:19

Dr Thomas Bowdler published an expurgated version of Shakespeare by taking out anything (he considered) rude. About 1800 or so. Very much foreshadowed Victorian prudery. Refers to censorship.

Yes. I know who he was. I don't understand the relevance to the statement, sorry. I must be feeling thick headed today.

TeaAndStrumpets · 18/02/2026 13:27

Datun · 18/02/2026 13:23

Yeah, call me a cynic but I'm not convinced.

It's entirely possible, of course. It doesn't stop these men being full of rage.

But it's the whole bodybuilding thing that's making me wonder. Would a person that into gym work reduce their testosterone by removing its source? Although I note he was saying he takes testosterone.

So who knows

Maybe he kept his testes? Hate to think, regardless!

TeaAndStrumpets · 18/02/2026 13:29

Helleofabore · 18/02/2026 13:26

Yes. I know who he was. I don't understand the relevance to the statement, sorry. I must be feeling thick headed today.

No worries, it's the prim correction of pronouns by the virtue signallers that gets on my wick !

Helleofabore · 18/02/2026 13:35

TeaAndStrumpets · 18/02/2026 13:29

No worries, it's the prim correction of pronouns by the virtue signallers that gets on my wick !

So, the comment was directed at me? Because I expressed confusion caused by the use of them / their in media when the media outlets had confirmation that the shooter was male? I am just checking again what the relevance is.

nicepotoftea · 18/02/2026 13:35

Datun · 18/02/2026 13:23

Yeah, call me a cynic but I'm not convinced.

It's entirely possible, of course. It doesn't stop these men being full of rage.

But it's the whole bodybuilding thing that's making me wonder. Would a person that into gym work reduce their testosterone by removing its source? Although I note he was saying he takes testosterone.

So who knows

I did wonder about that.

I don't really want to go looking for the tweet (and even if I found it there is no guarantee that it is truthful) but from memory it referred to the size of a hole.

Datun · 18/02/2026 13:36

TeaAndStrumpets · 18/02/2026 13:27

Maybe he kept his testes? Hate to think, regardless!

Well you've also got those men who keep their penis and testicles, and have an additional cavity created which they claim is a vagina.

A whole smorgasbord of genitalia, apparently.

How anyone could ever, possibly, in a million, zillion years think this issue isn't entirely down to sex is beyond me

TeaAndStrumpets · 18/02/2026 13:51

Helleofabore · 18/02/2026 13:35

So, the comment was directed at me? Because I expressed confusion caused by the use of them / their in media when the media outlets had confirmation that the shooter was male? I am just checking again what the relevance is.

Edited

I think we are at cross purposes. I wasn't commenting on anything you said at all, more on the context of the discussion ie about media sources obfuscating truth to serve some moralistic agenda. I was reminded of how Shakespeare's language was hallowed out for the sake of an academic with an agenda. What is being printed seems like Bowdlerisation to me. I wasn't being particular, I was being general.

I hope this makes sense. If not , all I can say is I've done my best!

Helleofabore · 18/02/2026 14:00

TeaAndStrumpets · 18/02/2026 13:51

I think we are at cross purposes. I wasn't commenting on anything you said at all, more on the context of the discussion ie about media sources obfuscating truth to serve some moralistic agenda. I was reminded of how Shakespeare's language was hallowed out for the sake of an academic with an agenda. What is being printed seems like Bowdlerisation to me. I wasn't being particular, I was being general.

I hope this makes sense. If not , all I can say is I've done my best!

Ahh.

Thank you. That is how I initially read it but then I thought about it and could thought it could be applied to my comment rather than what the media has been doing.

I do have a head cold so am fuzzy thinking today.

Swipe left for the next trending thread