This was interesting from Michael Foran.
The idea that many men who think they're women believe that access to women's single sex spaces 'is an essential part' of what they 'win' from the State when changing gender.
He explains that the State is happy to let these men write F in a bit of paperwork
but the longed-for 'automatic access' is quite a different matter:-
'There is an interesting difference between how courts compare the relative weight of civil status and access to single-sex spaces and how many trans rights campaigners do. Courts are highly likely to consider civil status such as is reflected in state documentation to be the core of the right to gender recognition where there is limited discretion on the state. On that view, access to a single-sex facility which affirms a transgender person’s identity is a peripheral aspect of the right, if it is covered at all. In contrast, many campaigners and activists seem to presume that access to single-sex spaces is core to the right to gender recognition. Without any case law to support this contention, it is hard to see how it could be true, at least as a matter of the jurisprudence of the ECtHR.'