Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Captain’s Bar, Edinburgh

96 replies

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 10/02/2026 23:21

Probably need to wait for the image to be approved but someone has left a recent review, Carol Anne, four days ago complaining of men using the women’s toilet.

Does the ‘legally-binding Global Human Rights Policy and Code of Non-discrimination, which prohibit discrimination based on gender, sexual orientation, and other protected characteristics’ allow them to mark a single use women’s toilet as ‘women’, yet continue to let males use it? Lovely to note GC women (those that don’t live in fantasy land) aren’t welcome in their parting shot.

Captain’s Bar, Edinburgh
OP posts:
AreYouSureAskedNaomi · 11/02/2026 11:40

"Inclusive environment" but also "I suggest you don't come"

Confused
Keeptoiletssafe · 11/02/2026 11:40

SwirlyGates · 11/02/2026 11:17

@Keeptoiletssafe I'm sure you know a 13 year old girl was raped recently in an Edinburgh toilet.

No I didn’t. I am sorry. There’s so many incidents I don’t collate. If you google local papers and search ‘toilet’ it will come up with closures (cost of maintenance due to misuse), deaths (drugs, suicide, medical emergencies like cardiac arrests and seizures) and sexual assaults, always by men, usually on younger women and children.
Its taught me that we should value our local press.

Keeptoiletssafe · 11/02/2026 12:11

Thank you seen that now. The report makes it very clear that the design (mixed sex, private) was a factor. Disabled toilets have always had known problems. That’s why radar keys were introduced. People who actually need these toilets, because it’s their only provision they can physically use, have to put up with so much misuse, dirt and vandalism too.

sharpshape · 11/02/2026 12:14

KnottyAuty · 11/02/2026 09:04

Can anyone who has been to this bar explain the toilet set up? If it’s a single use cubicle with sink inside then thats one thing (but not great for all the reasons @keeptoiletssafe will tell us) but if that cubicle is behind another door with a private lobby off the main space where people can wait then thats not at all safe or OK to have mixed sex use. Im assuming it’s the latter - possibly with the sink in that lobby space? Either way the management response seems rude and underlines why women should avoid it

If you go on trip advisor photos there so many pictures of the toilet doors at the end of the bar with clear signs on two separate doors saying Ladies on one and Gents on the other.

They do not look like single occupancy from the photos. Theres a push plate on the outside and no visible locking mechanism on the external doors.

sharpshape · 11/02/2026 12:18

@KnottyAuty start on photo 37 on trip advisor. That doesn’t look like a single occupancy and even if it is, it’s labelled ladies and the gents is the door to the right.

Soontobe60 · 11/02/2026 12:21

Slightyamusedandsilly · 11/02/2026 09:18

People who do those polls are those that have a vested interest either way. The vast majority of the population never consider this issue.

In my experience, the vast majority of the population don’t want men in dresses in their single sex spaces.

sharpshape · 11/02/2026 12:29

RareGoalsVerge · 11/02/2026 08:41

It's perfectly reasonable for a business to have 2 single-user cubicles which can be used by members of either sex. If males are allowed to use the one marked "women" and vice versa then that's the situation, anyone of either sex can use either. There's no legal protection against the trauma of seeing someone of the opposite sex emerging from the single-user cubicle you are about to use.

If the facility marked for "women" has an inner cubicle without a sink, and the sink is in outer area which isn't lockable, then that's a problem. If the facility marked for "men" contains a cubicle plus separate urinal such that males have access to 3 locations they can use, only one of which is accessible to most women, then that is discriminatory. However if it's just 2 fully enclosed single user facilities then there's no legal difference between notices that say "unisex" and notices that say "it doesn't matter what type of body you have, male and female bodies allowed in either, but people with ladyfeels are invited to use the one on the left and people with mascfeels are invited to use the one on the right and we don't care what the rest of you do". Labelling them as "Women" and "Men" but having a policy that amounts to them actually being Unisex isn't great, but the most they could legally be forced to do is label them correctly, they couldn't be forced to reserve one for biological females.

Take a look at phot 37 onwards on trip advisor. It does not look like single occupancy. Sorry for the repeat

BezMills · 11/02/2026 12:34

seems like a straightforward case of men breaking the law by using the female toilets. If the bar is allowing this, then they are breaking the law too.

The law as it has always been, and it was recently clarified by the Supreme Court in the FWS judgement last year.

TheMatildaEffect · 11/02/2026 12:36

Trouble is, the people that come on mn to say nobody has complained to them about men in women's toilets, probably don't realise what the reason for that is.

Keeptoiletssafe · 11/02/2026 12:52

The Building (Scotland) Act 2003 gives Scottish Ministers the power to make building
regulations to secure the health, safety, welfare and convenience of persons in or about buildings and of others who may be affected by buildings or matters connected with buildings.

This is the link to current regs:
https://www.gov.scot/binaries/content/documents/govscot/publications/advice-and-guidance/2024/11/building-standards-technical-handbook-january-2025-non-domestic/documents/building-standards-technical-handbook-january-2025-non-domestic/building-standards-technical-handbook-january-2025-non-domestic/govscot%3Adocument/Building%2BStandards%2B-%2BCore%2BDocuments%2B-%2BNon-domestic%2BTechnical%2BHandbook%2B-%2BJanuary%2B2025%2B-%2BFor%2BPublication.pdf

p282 onwards discusses toilet matters. A sanitary convenience is normally regs speak for a wc toilet, whereas a sanitary facility normally includes sinks too. Though I have found this gets very muddled.

You will see separate columns for females and males and these vary depending on type of establishment.

Generally in most toilet documents it’s accepted you need twice as many conveniences for women as men to obtain equity.

PopstarPoppy · 11/02/2026 14:53

TheMatildaEffect · 11/02/2026 12:36

Trouble is, the people that come on mn to say nobody has complained to them about men in women's toilets, probably don't realise what the reason for that is.

And also that the toilets are the thin end of the wedge. People in favour of inclusive toilets always make out that people are being unreasonable caring about where people pee. But if businesses and organisations get away with ignoring the law on toilet provision, what’s to stop them ignoring it elsewhere? Changing rooms, hospital wards, women’s refuges.

The other issue I have with a lot of women who aren’t concerned about mixed facilities is the argument ‘it doesn’t bother me’, as if that means it shouldn’t bother any other woman. Nobody should speak on other women’s behalf. Some women are lucky, and have never found themselves at the mercy of a violent man. Many of those who have feel threatened by having biological males in spaces where women are vulnerable.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/02/2026 15:04

Slightyamusedandsilly · 11/02/2026 09:56

I only know one person who holds an opinion (of EITHER side) on this issue. No one else I know has ever mentioned it. Even when we've had discussions that cover it.

I don’t know a single person who would rather use a mixed sex toilet than a single sex one.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/02/2026 15:06

Slightyamusedandsilly · 11/02/2026 08:53

Half the population don't feel this way about the issue. A few will. Not most.

You’re wrong. Most people prefer single sex facilities. You can’t just handwave away polls just because you don’t like them.

KnottyAuty · 11/02/2026 15:25

TheMatildaEffect · 11/02/2026 12:36

Trouble is, the people that come on mn to say nobody has complained to them about men in women's toilets, probably don't realise what the reason for that is.

Quite. They really don’t know what they don’t know and worse aren’t even curious to know. I just think “buffoon”

Grammarnut · 11/02/2026 15:43

RareGoalsVerge · 11/02/2026 08:41

It's perfectly reasonable for a business to have 2 single-user cubicles which can be used by members of either sex. If males are allowed to use the one marked "women" and vice versa then that's the situation, anyone of either sex can use either. There's no legal protection against the trauma of seeing someone of the opposite sex emerging from the single-user cubicle you are about to use.

If the facility marked for "women" has an inner cubicle without a sink, and the sink is in outer area which isn't lockable, then that's a problem. If the facility marked for "men" contains a cubicle plus separate urinal such that males have access to 3 locations they can use, only one of which is accessible to most women, then that is discriminatory. However if it's just 2 fully enclosed single user facilities then there's no legal difference between notices that say "unisex" and notices that say "it doesn't matter what type of body you have, male and female bodies allowed in either, but people with ladyfeels are invited to use the one on the left and people with mascfeels are invited to use the one on the right and we don't care what the rest of you do". Labelling them as "Women" and "Men" but having a policy that amounts to them actually being Unisex isn't great, but the most they could legally be forced to do is label them correctly, they couldn't be forced to reserve one for biological females.

If the lavatory is labelled women/female only biological females can use it. If they want everything unisex then two unisex cubicles with sinks, no urinals.

MarieDeGournay · 11/02/2026 15:47

PopstarPoppy · 11/02/2026 14:53

And also that the toilets are the thin end of the wedge. People in favour of inclusive toilets always make out that people are being unreasonable caring about where people pee. But if businesses and organisations get away with ignoring the law on toilet provision, what’s to stop them ignoring it elsewhere? Changing rooms, hospital wards, women’s refuges.

The other issue I have with a lot of women who aren’t concerned about mixed facilities is the argument ‘it doesn’t bother me’, as if that means it shouldn’t bother any other woman. Nobody should speak on other women’s behalf. Some women are lucky, and have never found themselves at the mercy of a violent man. Many of those who have feel threatened by having biological males in spaces where women are vulnerable.

Toilets are not just as you say, the thin end of a wedge, they seem to be something of an obsession with trans activists. Everything seems to come back to TOILETS. Women's toilets, specifically.

We say hospital wards, they say TOILETS!
We say rape crisis centres, they say TOILETS!
We say gender quotas, they say TOILETS!
We say Equality Act 2010, they say TOILETS!
We say safeguarding, they say TOILETS!
We say Supreme Court of the United Kingdom, they say TOILETS!

Sometimes I think the 'T' that was bolted on to 'LGB' actually stands for 'TOILETS!'
Obsessed🙄

ps I agree with your serious points PopstarPoppy.
It is a known strategy of abusers to push boundaries on the basis that 'if we can get them to accept this, we can do anything we want'

Slightyamusedandsilly · 11/02/2026 16:11

Ereshkigalangcleg · 11/02/2026 15:06

You’re wrong. Most people prefer single sex facilities. You can’t just handwave away polls just because you don’t like them.

And equally you can't claim they represent everyone. They only represent those who filled them in, e.g. people with a specific interest.

Slightyamusedandsilly · 11/02/2026 16:12

KnottyAuty · 11/02/2026 15:25

Quite. They really don’t know what they don’t know and worse aren’t even curious to know. I just think “buffoon”

I'm sure you do think that.

Imagine what the non-GC think of MN GC individuals.

Greyskybluesky · 11/02/2026 16:18

Slightyamusedandsilly · 11/02/2026 16:12

I'm sure you do think that.

Imagine what the non-GC think of MN GC individuals.

😂

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 11/02/2026 16:20

Slightyamusedandsilly · 11/02/2026 16:12

I'm sure you do think that.

Imagine what the non-GC think of MN GC individuals.

They can think! what for themselves? Like without having to be told you mean. Wow you'd never have guessed it. 😲

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 11/02/2026 16:21

Slightyamusedandsilly · 11/02/2026 16:12

I'm sure you do think that.

Imagine what the non-GC think of MN GC individuals.

From people who think wild shit like you can change sex and that women don’t have the right to single sex spaces, what they think of me is the least of my problems 😂.

OP posts:
Greyskybluesky · 11/02/2026 16:22

As I was told as a child, "only care about the opinion of people you care about"

Igneococcus · 11/02/2026 16:23

There's a woman working on my floor who doesn't even come into the women's toilet when she sees that one of the two cubicles is already in use. She leaves and uses the accessible toilet. I wonder how she would feel if a man would be in there if she doesn't even like to use it with another woman present.

JanesLittleGirl · 11/02/2026 16:27

Slightyamusedandsilly · 11/02/2026 16:11

And equally you can't claim they represent everyone. They only represent those who filled them in, e.g. people with a specific interest.

You do know how polls work right?

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 11/02/2026 16:28

Slightyamusedandsilly · 11/02/2026 16:11

And equally you can't claim they represent everyone. They only represent those who filled them in, e.g. people with a specific interest.

By that reasoning, surely those that don’t mind will fill in to say precisely that? You’ve cared enough to pop up on this thread to say so.

OP posts: